Time: Fri Sep 26 12:23:25 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA26502; Fri, 26 Sep 1997 09:09:15 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 08:50:21 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in toolbar] Subject: SLS: Answers (fwd) <snip> > >Subject: Answers. >Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 09:53:30 -0500 > >Dear Congress people, > >I have been studying the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) for over 30+ years. I >became a financial planner and a series licensed stockbroker over 20+ years >ago. I have had hundreds of clients and not one person that I have spoken >to, knows the law that makes them liable to pay or the person liable to >file a 1040 form. The list of people includes CPA and lawyers. I have >read and reread the Internal Revenue Code and all the research that has >been done and reported on the Internet. If there is a law, it needs to be >in plain English and no double talk, so the CPA and the lawyers can point >it out to the people. > >I have talked to many IR agents and they do not know the law that makes you >liable or any other questions that I have asked them both on the phone and >in letterform. I have tapes and made copies of my talks to IR agents. I >have one where the IR agent told me that she worked for the Internal >Revenue Service and she did not have to obey the law. You see I believe >that I understand the IRC and the IR agent are a collection service and >they only know how to get money out of people with threats and >intimidation, as you have read in the papers and seen on the CNN reporting >on the IR hearings. All the people of the several states are afraid of the >IR agent. > >I have my own story but it is not about money, they just put you through >hell, maybe hell is better, all I know is it causes people to kill >themselves. > >I just witnessed a judge not telling the whole truth in a court of law. >Isn't a courtroom for all the truth? The trail is about filing a 1040 >form. He says that every taxpayer must file a tax return, but are all the >people taxpayers? As a financial planner, it was my job to know the tax >laws and not every person is a taxpayer. So just what makes one of the >people a person made liable or a taxpayer? I believe the only answer for >the people living and working in the 50 several states is that they were >told they had to. I have never read or seen any law that requires anyone >inhabiting or working in the 50 several states to file a 1040 form. You >need to have the judges testify in the IR hearing. > >Why do I send this letter to you? > >1. The IR agents tell me to contact my congressperson. I have and all you >do is sent the request to an IR agent to answer and I get the same old >answers. They do not know the law and they do not answer the question >asked of them because they either do not know the answer or they are lying >to the people. > >2. You, as congresspersons, write the bills that become law. I know that >most of them have never been properly ratified per the law of the land. IF >you do not know this than you need to reread the Organic Constitution of >the united States of America. I have a copy of the Constitution that was >printed for the law academy of Philadelphia in 1834. If you do not have a >copy of this book, you may not know that you have been and are still being >lied to! > >3. I know you were not born when the problem started and neither was I. >To correct the problem you have to know and tell the truth. > >4. Most of IR agents do not know the truth. Some of the IR agent has been >lied to. The American people have been lied to. The IR agents are not >required to sign under penalty of perjury, but the person that files a 1040 >form does. That does not sound good in my book. > >5. I have a video of an IR agent that I recorded and he would not say that >he works for the united States Government. If he does as everyone thinks >they do, why did he not just say that he worked for the Government? Why do >the IR agents get their payroll checks from the Dept. of Agriculture? > >6. I heard on CNN on the hearings that the IR agents work for the united >States Government. I want proof of that statement. I want you as Congress >people to provide me with the ratified law that makes them an agent of the >united States Government. > >7. If you can actual do this and I do not think you can, then I want the >delegation of authority for them to be collecting assets from the people >inhabiting the several states. > >8. Last I want the agents that testified in your hearings certification of >oath of office that is required of all people that work for the united >States Government. I also want all the congress people that were in the >hearing certification of oath of office. > >9. I also want the law that requires the people that inhabit the several >states, to file a 1040 form. > >10. Are you operating under some declared or undeclared war and is the >President running the united States under executive orders, whereby you as >Congress people do not have any say in the running the Government? > >I could make a list so long that it would require you to have another >hearing to just answer the questions. You are required to tell the truth >and the people require you to do your jobs as elected officers of the >united States of America. > >I am seeking accountability and competency in the process of instituting >lawful government under the Constitution of the united States of America >being "the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be >bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the >Contrary notwithstanding". Article VI, Section 2. > >11. What part of notwithstanding do yuo not understand? > >12. Why did Paul Harvey announced on national radio, that "the 10th Circuit >Court has admitted that we are not required to file a 1040 form?" Why do >some judge know the truth and some don't or is some of them lying to the >people? > >13. I require anyone that works for the united States Government to comment >on the truth in the following article that I wrote: > > >I have reviewed the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) volume 1 and 2, and you >will notice that each of the following Sections defines "United States" >differently. My initial question was why does the IRC define "United >States" differently, period. The following can be documented by reviewing >the IRC, which you can find in any city library. > >Turn to Employment taxes, Chapters 21 through 25 of Subtitle C of the Code. > You will see Sec. 3121 Definitions listed under Chapter 21 -- Federal >insurance contribution act. Sec. 3121(b) Employment; takes over eleven >pages and has some key words in it, 'within the United States' and 'outside >United States'. Now turn to 3121(e), it reads as follows -- 'state, United >States, and Citizen -- For purposes of this chapter -- (1) State. -- The >term "state" includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto >Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa. (2) United States -- >The term "United States" when used in a geographical sense includes the >Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American >Samoa..' Note: they did not define "Citizen". I guess they could not >figure out a way to deceive you and make it sound legal. Just to remind >you, the rule of statutory construction is every time you see any >derivative of the word 'include' you should think 'include only' or >'includes only' or 'including only'. Note the IRC even changed the meaning >of "include". I can only agree why it is called a code. > >Turn to Sec. 4612(a) For purposes of this subchapter meaning A -- Tax on >Petroleum. '#(4). United States -- (A) In General. -- The term "United >States" means the 50 states, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of >Puerto Rico, any possession of the United States, the commonwealth of the >Northern Mariana Islands, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands.' >You should note that this Sec. does not use the word include. If the code >is for us why are their different definitions for the "United States"? >There is more! > >Turn to Subtitle F -- Procedure and Administration and then to Sec. >6103(b)(5)(A). 'State. -- The term "State" means -- (A) any of the 50 >States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the >Virgin Islands, the Canal Zone, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth >of the Northern Mariana Islands, and....' You should also note that the >word include is not used in this Section, either. > >At first I was so confused that I decided to go to the Black's Law >Dictionary. I was taught in school that the first listed definition is the >most widely used and I was even more confused when I read the first >definition, 'This term has several meanings.' Congress on Oct. 3, 1913, on >pg. 177 of the record states 'H. That the word "State" or "United States" >when used in this section shall be construed to include any Territory, >Alaska, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Philippine Islands, >when such construction is necessary to carry out its provisions'. I have >read the two volumes several times and I believe that I am not a United >States citizen. Therefore, for the IRC, I am a Nonresident alien >individual as defined in Sec. 871 in Subpart A of Subchapter N of Chapter 1 >of Subtitle A of Title 26. I do not live in or have income that is >connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States >as defined in Employment Taxes sec. 3121(b). If you understand what the >words mean then you too will see in Sec. 871(c) that the people inhabiting >and working in the several state are not within the United States or even >temporarily present in the United States unless you are in the District of >Columbia or it's Territories as defined Sec. 3121(e). > >I believe if they defined "United States" in Sec. 3121(e) under Employment >Taxes, the same way they defined it in Sec. 4612(a) under Subchapter A. - >Tax on petroleum, then the Sixteenth Amendment would be unconstitutional. >Since the sixteenth Amendment is only for U.S. Citizens, then only the >citizens of the United States as defined in Sec. 3121(e) are subject to the >IRC. Please read the Constitution for the rest of the story. > >The IRC is not for people inhabiting the several states (50 united States >of America) and if you inhabit them you should not be using the IRC to >defend yourself. Just read the IRC and if you can understand all the >double talk, you to will see for yourself, that it is not for you, unless >you work in "State" or "United States" as defined in Section 3121(e) of the >IRC. See 6331 (a) of the IRC. It states: "Levy may be made upon the >accrued salary of wages of any officer, employee, or elected official, of >the United States, the District of Columbia or any agency or >instrumentality of the United States or District of Columbia by serving a >notice of levy on the employer (as defined in section3401 (d)) of such >officer, employee, or elected official." End of story! > >Further evidence was presented on the episode of 20/20 that aired in April >of 1994. Phillip and Marlene Marsh of the Pilot Connection offered a >$100,000 reward for anyone who could produce a law that required them to >file a Form 1040. The IRS was on the show and did not claim the reward. >I have since read the following: "November 30, 1994 was a great day for >every freedom loving America! Phillip and Marlene Marsh of the Pilot >Connection, were indicted last year after 'untaxing' over 10,000 Citizens >and blasting the IRS on the 20/20 national television program. The jury >verdict is in! The Marshes and the other 6 defendants were NOT convicted >on any of the 45 counts the Government brought against them! The rest of >the story: I have been told that they were retried and are now in jail. I >believe the answer to "Why do so many people go to jail?" can only be >answered by "They just don't know the law and just stop filing". They use >the the wrong part of the IRC to defend themself. You can not just stop >filing. Another reason people go to jail is that they rely on a lawyer and >a lawyer just does not know the law, either! > >Paul Harvey announced on national radio, that the 10th Circuit Court has >admitted that we are not "required" to file a 1040 form!!" > >Stop by your local IRS office and ask for the booklet "Instructions for >Form 1040NR". Read page 2, Resident Alien or Nonresident Alien. If you >know who you are and where you live, you will realize that you are a >"nonresident Alien". Now it gets tricky. If you read "Who Must File", #1 >doesn't sound right, #2 doesn't sound right, #3 doesn't sound right and >neither does #4. So you must not have to file, right? Well if you want to >be on the safe side maybe you should file a 1040NR. Remember that your >income within the U.S. is '0'. Where to file is also very important. You >must send the return to the correct address. Do not put your S.S.N. on the >form or attach a W-2 to the return. Your S.S.N. which is on your W-2 >admits that you have declared that you are a U.S. Citizen. You have signed >your last three year's 1040 forms, which also declared you as U.S. Citizen. > Do not use a zip code or two letter abbreviation of the state you inhabit >because it also denotes that you inhabit a territory. Note: now that you >know that you are not a U.S. Citizen and you sign a 1040 form, I believe >you are committing "perjury". If you want to elect to be taxed as a >Resident Alien, just read the next section of the 1040NR instructions. You >may not file a joint return. If your spouse elects to file as a U.S. >Citizen (see Pub. 515 page 2 and also page 5 under Employees), you must >also file as a U.S. citizen. If you decide that you are a "nonresident >alien, you should file 1040NR's for the last three years. > >This information is distributed by a sovereign Citizen of one of the 50 >States under the First Amendment Rights of the Constitution. I am not a >Tax Protester. I do not disagree with or protest the law. The Law, the >Income Tax Regulations and the supreme Court all concur: "Compensation for >labor, earned by an American Citizen, in any of the 50 states, an >occupation of common right, is not taxable"! "The graduated income tax is >100% voluntary for these citizen"! I agree, so there is no law to protest! > Everyone is presumed to know the "Law", so please call Free the People! a >division of: We the People (714) 375-6631 to order a book that will help >you learn the truth. > >Remember the saying "The Truth Shall Set You Free!". > >Reported by Media Bypass Magazine Sept. 1996 (800) 429-7277. The "IRS" is >not a lawful entity but just another "term". The term "Director, Alcohol, >Tobacco and Firearms Division" has been replaced by the term "Internal >Revenue Service" can be found in Federal Register Vol. 41, Sept. 15, 1976. > >An article titled "Victory Over the Internal Revenue Service" was printed >in Veritas newspaper in July, 1996, stated: "On September 21, 1992, Tom >Sullivan radio talk show (KFBK in Sacramento, California), hosted two IRS >agents, Vicky Willis and John Deering, who admitted that forty percent of >the potential 175 million plus American 'taxpayers' are not filing federal >income tax returns. These IRS agents told us that 70 million potential >'taxpayers' are not filing federal income tax returns. This is why Bill >Archer, Newt Gingrich, Richard Armey and others are making statements like >those recorded in the U. S. News & World Report. One way or another, the >current and unlawfully applied income tax will cease to exist. Either the >government will abolish it or the people will." > >/S/ Steven Pattison > >Steven Pattison Pattisons@worldnet.att.net >10911 Reeder >Overland Park, Kansas, zip code exempt. >Phone (913) 491-0320 ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine : tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in toolbar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this _____________________________________: As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail