Time: Thu Oct 02 18:09:07 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA00366; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 18:08:42 -0700 (MST) by usr05.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA06201; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 18:07:08 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 18:06:32 -0700 To: Coya Spoto <S-SPCOL@vjcstu01.vjc.edu> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Dred Scott decision and the outcome We don't exactly have a brief, as such, on the Dred Scott decision, but our work truly pivots on the holding in that case. What followed was a HUGE political controversy in America, over the true meaning of that extremely long decision; then a massive and bloody war; followed by the 13th and 14th amendments [sic]. I believe Taney was mostly correct, but you must read the entire decision to understand the full breadth of that opinion. If you want to pick up there, then read the case of Dyett v. Turner, Utah Supreme Court, which is excerpted in the NINTH NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE in the case of USA v. Knudson. This case is now loaded into the Supreme Law Library ("SLL") at the URL just below my name here (which you now have). This is document #13 in the case law section of SLL. Go to the home page; click on "Supreme Law Library" in the left margin; then click on "U.S.A. v. Knudson"; this will take you to a "Table of Contents", and then click on "13. 21382 [bytes] NINTH NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE". The full decision in Dyett v. Turner is out there on the Internet, somewhere in this vast ocean of resources we now have at our finger tips. If you want to journey into our very latest, and the most sophisticated work we have done to date, take time to read and study the OPENING BRIEF in USA v. Gilbertson. You would do best to take this to the local law library, so that you can have volumes of reference materials near by. You might also leave a hard copy with the librarians, so that they can tell their clients about this brief. We have received many compliments of this brief, from all over the country, especially after loading it into SLL. Thanks for staying in touch. I hope life is going well with you and yours. /s/ Paul Mitchell http://supremelaw.com copy: Supreme Law School At 08:47 PM 10/2/97 -0500, you wrote: >I wanted to read your brief on the Dred Scott decision. And I wanted to >thank you for all the work you are doing on behalf of us citizens. You are very welcome. We appreciate your kindness very VERY much! /s/ Paul Mitchell http://supremelaw.com > >God bless. =========================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01 B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02 tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03 email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04 website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05 ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06 Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07 Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08 _____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09 As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10 not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11 ======================================================================== 12 [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail