Time: Sat Aug 30 04:25:31 1997 by usr09.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA21581; Fri, 29 Aug 1997 19:13:21 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 1997 19:11:44 -0700 To: snetnews@world.std.com From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition I believe Black's displays a statutory copyright notice, and is sold commercially. I found a good used one, in our local second-hand book store. Check around; there is now a paperback version too. /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com At 08:51 PM 8/29/97 -0400, you wrote: > >-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List > > >During a heated debate with a left wing, 25yrs of service, state employee, I >made reference to a portion of the document as standing law. She informed me >"that document holds no weight of law". > >Is there a URL where I can axcess Black's Law Dictionary so I may re-kindle >said debate > >rod >RAmes0@aol.com >that's ^ a zero >--------------------- >Forwarded message: >From: pmitch@primenet.com (Paul Andrew Mitchell) >Reply-to: snetnews@world.std.com >To: snetnews@world.std.com >Date: 97-08-28 14:35:48 EDT > > >-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List > >How did you come to "understand" this? > >Confer at "Declaration of Independence" >in Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition >(with pronunciations). > >/s/ Paul Mitchell >http://www.supremelaw.com > > > >At 10:51 PM 8/26/97 -0400, you wrote: >> >>-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List >> >>As I understand it, The Declaration of Independance "holds no weight of >law". >> Please correct me if I am wrong and give ref. >> >>rod >>--------------------- >>Forwarded message: >>From: pmitch@primenet.com (Paul Andrew Mitchell) >>Reply-to: snetnews@world.std.com >>Date: 97-08-21 17:07:02 EDT >> >> >>-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List >> >>The treaties do not and cannot "grant" >>rights here in America, because these treaties >>are designed to reinforce and bolster >>the fundamental Rights which are recognized >>by our local constitutions. Our several >>constitutions already recognize the Source >>of our rights, and that Source is not our >>governments. Read the Declaration of >>Independence, for proof. There is nothing >>in these treaties which could ever be construed >>to override, or supersede, this Declaration. >> >>In other nations of the world, their governments >>may, in fact, be recognized as the "source" of >>their human rights, but not here! That was the >>unique situation which motivated Congress to >>attach these explicit reservations in the first >>place. >> >>Take, for example, the obligation that >>states party to the treaties will take steps >>to guarantee "effective judicial remedies" [sic], and >>to develop the "possibilities of effective >>judicial remedies". There is nothing in such a >>goal which would impair or impede the magnificent >>body of law which has evolved from the due process >>clause in our Fifth Amendment. It is very easy >>to demonstrate that the U.S. has failed miserably, >>for neglecting to develop the possibilities of >>effective judicial remedies; on the contrary, >>they are now actively obstructing a well conceived, >>and properly filed, challenge to the constitutionality >>of our federal and state jury selection processes. >>See Gilbertson's OPENING BRIEF in the Supreme Law >>Library for evidence proof positive. >> >>That, right there, is probable cause to sue the >>U.S. in the local county courts, for obstructing >>and impeding effective judicial remedies, and to >>compel them, via Mandamus, to get their house in >>order, or find themselves in contempt of court, >>and possibly also prison, until and unless they >>start to obey the supreme Law of this Land. >> >>/s/ Paul Mitchell >>http://www.supremelaw.com >> >>copy: Supreme Law School >> >> >> >> >>At 05:29 PM 8/20/97 PST, you wrote: >>> <I think this gives the human Rights treaties much more importance >>> than they have enjoyed hitherto. >>> >>> /s/ Paul Mitchell >>> http://www.supremelaw.com> >>> >>> Not really. There is no such thing as "Human Rights". >>> >>> These treaties simpy grant PRIVLEGES, not rights. For Rights are >>> inalienable, meaning they cannot be rescinded, rejected, nor taken >>> away. Priveleges are granted by governments (treaties, UN shit, >>> etc.). Since they are granted by government, they can be taken away >>> by government. >>> >>> Since the UN is, fundamentally, an atheist organization, the "human >>> rights" they speak of are nothing more than government granted >>> priveleges. There is no freedom whatsoever under any UN treaty, nor >>> can any rights be granted nor abridged by Treaty. >>> >>> Treaties and Rights have nothing to do with each other. >>> >>> Treaties are agreements between governments. Rights are a gift of >>> Divine Providence. >>> >>> cordially, >>> >>> >>> Dan Terry >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >>>Unsub info - send e-mail to majordomo@majordomo.pobox.com, with >>>"unsubscribe liberty-and-justice" in the body (not the subject) >>>Liberty-and-Justice list-owner is Mike Goldman <whig@pobox.com> >>> >>> >> >>======================================================================== >>Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness >>B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine >> >>tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night >>email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU >>website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now >>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best >> Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone >> Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this >> >>As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall >>not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. >>======================================================================== >>[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] >> >>-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com >>-> Posted by: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] >> >> >> >>-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com >>-> Posted by: RAmes0@aol.com >> >> >> > >======================================================================== >Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness >B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine > >tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night >email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU >website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now >ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best > Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone > Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this > >As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall >not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. >======================================================================== >[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] > >-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com >-> Posted by: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] > > > > > >-------- > >-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com >-> Posted by: RAmes0@aol.com > > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail