Time: Fri Aug 22 21:24:45 1997 by usr03.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA02261; Fri, 22 Aug 1997 14:13:49 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 1997 14:12:24 -0700 To: MSmith6791@aol.com From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Conspiracy Theorists Invade College (fwd) There are just too many fakes of Zapruder floating around, including the ones which Life Magazine altered, by swapping frame numbers. Take that into serious account, okay? It is clear they are trying to cover up the reaction of the cranium to the high-speed impact. Remember, the motorcycle Cop, riding to Kennedy's left rear, got sprayed with brains and blood. Your trajectory here would not have done that. The Zapruder original shows cloud of atomized blood, as car moves forward. The motorcycle ran right into it. Get down to precision as to that motorcycle's exact trajectory: we are talking one-inch tolerances here. You must think like an engineer, to solve this one. On exit, the high-speed fragmentation bullet would result in exploding the cranium; that is exactly what happened. You need a very long-barrel rifle, to accelerate the bullet to such a high speed; hand guns have a much shorter barrel, right? Do your own comparisons: muzzle velocity of 40 calibers (then!), versus muzzle velocity of .3006 deer rifles (then). That answers your question completely, I believe. /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com At 04:11 PM 8/22/97 -0400, you wrote: > >-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List > > >In a message dated 8/22/97 8:03:53 PM, you wrote: > ><<An animated sequence of key frames from >the Zapruder Film is now available on the >Internet. Polaroid Woman is clearly visible >in this sequence, although the version of >the Internet animation which I saw, did not >draw any attention to her. I have since >contacted the webmaster of that site, and >he agrees that Polaroid Woman is clearly >visible, raising her camera to click off >what has to be THE most important single >photo ever taken of JFK's murder scene.>> > >*** So you don't believe the section of film I have showing the driver >shotting Connely and Kennedy is valid? You see the gun puffing, you hear 2 >shots, first at Connelly as he reacts and slides down in the seat, and then >you see the second puff, hear the sound and see K. head blow off from that >direction? No good? Not valid? > >Michael Smith >MSMITH6791@AOL.COM > >-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com >-> Posted by: MSmith6791@aol.com > > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail