Time: Sat Sep 06 22:49:07 1997 Date: Sat, 06 Sep 1997 21:35:14 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in toolbar] Subject: SLS: Meador's Oklahoma law suit CIVBRI~1.ASC is attached in BinHex encoding. I can also encode in MIME and Uuencode. This law suit attacked the legality of the Agreement on Coordination of Tax Administration between Oklahoma state and the IRS. It contains lots of excellent and current legal evidence. /s/ Paul Mitchell http://supremelaw.com p.s. .ASC and .BAK are identical copies My letter to the Oklahoma Tax Commission now follows: [This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] MEMO TO: David K. Smith Oklahoma Tax Commission State of Oklahoma c/o 2501 Lincoln Blvd. Oklahoma City 73194-0001/tdc OKLAHOMA STATE FROM: Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Counselor at Law DATE: June 2, 1997 SUBJECT: Agreement on Coordination of Tax Administration between Oklahoma Tax Commission and "IRS" [sic] I have recently come to possess a photocopy of your Agreement on Coordination of Tax Administration, executed between the Oklahoma Tax Commission and the Internal Revenue Service, as requested and received by a Citizen of Oklahoma state on May 16, 1997. In Section 2: Definitions, We find the following definition: 2.2 IRS The term "IRS" means the Internal Revenue Service, U.S. Department of the Treasury [sic]. [bold emphasis added] Please provide Us with the exact citation(s) within Title 31, United States Code, which authorize the Internal Revenue Service to exist as a department or bureau within the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Our reading of Title 31 tells Us that the Internal Revenue Service is not listed among those subordinate bureaus and departments, unlike the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, which is listed therein. See 31 C.F.R. 51.2 and 52.2 for regulations. Please also take note of the fact that Title 31, United States Code ("U.S.C."), has been enacted into positive law, rendering it conclusive evidence of the statutes in question. By comparison, Title 26, U.S.C., has not been enacted into positive law, which means that Internal Revenue Code ("IRC") section 7851(a)(6)(A) now controls the applicability of all of subtitle F of the IRC -- Procedure and Administration. The term "this title" as that term is used at IRC 7851(a)(6)(A) refers to Title 26, U.S.C. For proof, compare, in pari materia, the Historical and Statutory Notes following 28 U.S.C. 132, with the original Act dated June 25, 1948, C. 646, Sections 2 to 39, 62 Stat. 985 to 991, as amended, specifically under the sub- heading "Continuation of Organization of Court" [sic]. While you are investigating your answer to this question, please allow Us also to refer you specifically to the California Supreme Court case of People v. Boxer, docket number S-030016, dated December 1992. See Full Faith and Credit Clause for authority. Thank you very much for your consideration. Sincerely yours, /s/ Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Counselor at Law and federal witness c/o 2509 N. Campbell Avenue, #1776 Tucson, Arizona state Postal Zone 85719/tdc email: pmitch@primenet.com (586/Eudora Pro 3.0.2: preferred, to conserve all resources) phone: (520) 320-1514 (private line: please get permission to disclose) fax machine: (520) 320-1256 (dedicated hard copy: available 24-hours per day or night) fax modem: (520) 320-1513 (dedicated email line: please call phone: to switch software) web site: http://www.supremelaw.com copy: Supreme Law School The Internet # # # Attachment Converted: "C:\ATTACH\CIVBRI~1.ASC" Attachment Converted: "C:\ATTACH\CIVBRI~1.BAK" ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine : tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in toolbar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this _____________________________________: As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]From ???@??? Fri Sep 05 15:47:26 1997 by usr02.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA24115; Fri, 5 Sep 1997 14:18:08 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 05 Sep 1997 14:18:08 -0700 To: bosinc@swbell.net From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: meaning of "national" and other matters At 03:45 PM 9/5/97 -0500, you wrote: >paul, >just received your ltr today and must say i am confused by the computer >brochures and the brevity of your note. Bill, I am getting inundated with all kinds of email and regular mail. Can you rewind to that point for me, if you don't mind? I am sending out HP brochures, because I regard the package to be a very good starter machine for serious Internet users. HP's technical support is consistently ranked tops, so this would relieve me of the need to provide computer support, when I am not getting paid for it. My time is better spent on the legal research, because the payoff for the nation is so much greater. i will read the case you >highlighted; but would sincerely like to hear from someone that has made >it clear of the feds without serving time. I have been up before several federal judges, as a litigant, and as a counsel. I have not ever been charged with a crime, even though I had one judge threaten me with prison if I did not appear for an IRS summons. So, you have now heard from "someone who has made it clear of the feds without serving time." Where do we go now, in this dialogue, you and I? there has to be someone that >will share their experiences without being paranoid. I am loading into the Supreme Law Library EVERY SINGLE PLEADING which I have already filed, on my own behalf, or on behalf of clients who have, in almost all cases, signified their acceptance of the work by signing and filing these pleadings. Their signatures will be shown as follows: /s/ John E. Trumane If a signature line does not exhibit this type of "signature," then they did not sign the pleading in question. Our webmaster is hard at work designing and preparing the massive number of files (almost 500). It is just going to take time; we are also actively soliciting financial support for the webmaster, who is being paid at his standard professional rate, because he deserves it. He is good, and has earned his right to charge what he does. I am not paranoid, although I do admit that there was a long period in my life when I was paralyzed with fear. With God's help and a willing heart, He pulled me out of that terrible paralysis, so I do give credit Where credit is due. > >i do have a technical question about "nationals" but will post it for >all. The term is defined by federal statutes, whereas the Qualifications Clauses are in the Constitution, and have been since the year 1788. Congress cannot amend the U.S. Constitution; only the several states can do so, by a three-fourths vote. So, you are on much firmer ground by claiming a status which is recognized in the Qualifications Clauses at 1:2:2, 1:3:3, and 2:1:5. These Clauses have never been amended, although a recent attempt did fail. This matter is covered in some detail in Gilbertson's OPENING BRIEF. /s/ Paul Mitchell http://supremelaw.com > >thank you and good luck, bill You are very welcome. Thanks to you also for your continuing support. It means so very much to all of Us who have been working so hard to make progress with the massive fraud which has been perpetrated upon the entire American Population. /s/ Paul Mitchell http://supremelaw.com copy: Supreme Law School ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail