Time: Thu Aug 14 07:28:54 1997 by usr01.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA23084; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 04:24:17 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 04:23:10 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: military control (fwd) <snip> > >Hello people, >Just got concrete evidence of the military conquest that we have been >under since 1862. Montgomery is working on it and when it is done we >will distribute it. It deals with a 1995/6 case filed by a federal judge >challenging the 14th amendment. This resulted in further research by >montgomery proving what we had already concluded that we have no forum at >all in this country to go to. When we bring in the right argument the >military courts of the de facto govt will not allow it to be brought to >the attention of the american people. No matter what we do it won't >cause a "win" in the courts. You can stop the action at the >administrative level at the lowest common denominator but that's it, >provided you present certain issues they won't address. Once you are a >defendant or plaintiff it's over and done with, you lose. All the >paperwork and correct arguments are a waste of time. Education of the >people is the only hope. BUT, how do you tell them Santa doesn't exist >after 200 years in beliving in the constution of 1789. > >Here are two excerpts from two sources that will make you sit up and take >notice. > >Number one: From the Los Angeles Times July 4, 1997 regarding retired >Sgt. Maj. Brenda Hoster's sexual charges against Army sgt. Maj. McKinney; > >"Based on Jarvis' request the Army now will reconsider recalling her to >military status under a statute intended to allow reactivation of former >service members IN TIMES OF WAR OR NATIONAL EMERGENCY." >Lets write to Ms Dina Bass who did the story at Voices, Los Angeles >Times, Times Mirror Square, Los Angeles, Calif. 90053 and ask what war we >are under or what national emergency we are under to cause the statute to >be used. She didn't mention the statute so ask her what statute it is. > >Number Two: a quotation from George P. Fletchre, Professor or >Jurisprudence at Columbia Law School, states; >"Our constitutional situation would be much clearer if we marked the >DISCONTINUITY in our history by calling the first Constitution the >`founding republic' and the second, say, the `egalitarian republic.'" he >then states; >"We have propagated MYTHS about the binding force of the 1789 >Constitution that some people, unfortunately, TAKE TOO SERIOUSLY." > > Any one with common sense and logic can start bombarding the >Professor, who knows damn well what is going on, with questions on his >statements. He has never, in my educated opinion, told any of his >students about this and why the law schools never teach fundamental >principles of law or the law itself. That is why lawyers are so ignorant >and are controlled by their superiors, the other liers called judges. > Well people the Informer has always said the Constitution was not >ours and we were never bound by it. >The New History of America just supports these two separate statements >that treaty of the Crown still rules us and the actions of the era of the >14th amendment brought about, under Lincoln, the de- facto shadow >government under military rule by his 157 Articles of war in his general >Order 100, and 12 Stat 319 which was never repealed and is in full force >and effect today. Proving, as Linda Thompson agrees, that we have no >forum to go to. Stop wasting time in chasing the carrot by filing all >these meritless law pleadings in their military courts. > Be prepared to get violently ill when we come out with this >material that can't be disputed. It is on order of the same type >material and proof that is in the New History of America. > > Cheers, > Big Al > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail