Time: Sun Sep 07 01:12:01 1997 by usr09.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA24392; Sun, 7 Sep 1997 19:33:16 -0700 (MST) Date: Sun, 07 Sep 1997 19:33:11 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: THE INDICTABLES (fwd) <snip> > >THE INDICTABLES >Extract from "The World Order," by Eustace Mullins > > Although the World Order has control of the legal >system and the courts, it remains vulnerable to any >enforcement of the pre-existing body of law which the host >had formulated to protect his society. This body of law >forbids everything that the parasite is doing, and forces the >parasite to maintain a precarious existence outside of the >law. If the law were to be enforced at any time, the parasite >would be dislodged. The existing body of law clearly >forbids the operation of criminal syndicates, which is >precisely what the hegemony of parasitism and its World >Order is. Criminal syndicalism denies the equal protection >of the law to citizens. Only by acting against criminal >syndicalism can the state protect its citizens. > > Corpus Juris Secundum 16: Constitutional Law >213(10) states: "The Constitutional guaranty of freedom of >speech does not include the right to advocate, or conspire >to effect, the violent destruction or overthrow of the >government or the criminal destruction of property. >214: The Constitutional guaranty of the right of assembly >was never intended as a license for illegality or invitation >for fraud -- the right of freedom of assembly may be abused >by using assembly to incite violence and crime, and the >people through their legislatures may protect themselves >against the abuse." > > The assembly of any World Order organization, >such as the Council on Foreign Relations or any >foundation, is subject to the laws against fraud (their >charters claim they are engaged in philanthropy), and >enforcement of the laws against criminal syndicalism >would end the institutions through which the World Order >illegally rules the people of the United States, the illegal >conspiracies and the introduction of alien laws into our >system by the foundations' instructions to Congress. > > We have already shown that the Rockefeller >Foundation and other key organizations of the World Order >are "Syndicates," which are engaged in the practice of >criminal syndicalism. But what is a "syndicate"? The >Oxford English Dictionary [OED] notes that the word stems >from "syndic." A syndic is defined as "an officer of >government, a chief magistrate, a deputy." In 1601 >R. Johnson wrote in Kingd and commw "especiall men, >called Syndiques, who haue the managing of the whole >commonwealth." [Ed. Note: Old English spelling] Thus >the Rockefeller Foundation and its associated groups are >carrying out their delegated function of managing the entire >commonwealth, but not for the benefit of the people, or of >any government except the secret super-government, the >World Order, which they serve. The OED further defines a >syndic as "a censor of the actions of another. To accuse." >Here too, the syndicate functions, according to its definition -- >the syndicate censors all thought and media, primarily to >protect its own power. It also brings accusations -- as >many American citizens have found to their sorrow. Not >even Sir Walter Raleigh was immune. When he interfered >with the international money trade, he was accused of >"treason" and beheaded. > > The OED defines a "syndicate" as follows: >"3. A combination of capitalists and financiers entered into >for the purpose of prosecuting a scheme requiring large >sources of capital, especially one having the object of >obtaining control of the market in a particular commodity. >To control, manage or effect by a syndicate." Note the key >words in this definition -- a combination -- prosecuting -- >obtaining control. The scheme does not require "large >capital" -- it requires "large sources of capital," the bank of >England or the Federal Reserve System. > > Corpus Juris Secundum 22A says of Criminal >Syndicalism, "In a prosecution for being a member of an >organization which teaches and abets criminal >syndicalism, evidences of crimes committed by past or >present members of the organization in their capacity as >members is admissible to show its character." People v. >LaRue 216 P 627 C.A. 276. Thus testimony about John >Foster Dulles financing the Nazi Government of Germany, >his telegram starting the Korean War, and other evidence >can be used to indict any member of the Rockefeller >Foundation in any state or locality in which the Rockefeller >Foundation has ever been active in any way. Since these >organizations are all closely interlocked, and there is so >much available evidence of their illegal operations, it will be >relatively simple to obtain criminal convictions against them >for their criminal syndicalist operations. > > Corpus Juris Secundum 22, Criminal Law >185(10); Conspiracy and Monopolies: "Where the statute >makes mere membership in an organization formed to >promote syndicalism a crime, without an overt act, this >offense is indictable in any county into which a member >may go during the continuance of his membership, and >this is true although such member comes into a county >involuntarily. People v. Johansen, 226 P 634, 66 C.A. 343." > > Corpus Juris Secundum 22, Criminal Law >sec. 182(3) states, "A prosecution for conspiracy to commit >an offense against the U.S. may also be tried in any district >wherein any overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy is >performed. U.S. v. Cohen C.A.N.J. 197 F 2d 26." Thus a >publication by the Council on Foreign Relations promoting >the stripping of sovereignty of the United States of America, >mailed into any county of the U.S.; the county authorities can >bring the Council on Foreign Relations, or any member >therein, to trial in the county, and any action by any member >of the Council on Foreign Relations in the past is >admissible as evidence, such as starting World War II, >subsidizing the Nazi Government, or subsidizing the USSR. > > Criminal syndicalism can also be prosecuted >according to Corpus Juris Secundum 46, Insurrection and >Sedition: sec. 461 c. "Sabotage and syndicalism aiming to >abolish the present political and social system, including >direct action or sabotage." Thus any program of a >foundation which seeks to abolish the present political or >social system of the United States can be prosecuted. Of >course every foundation program seeks to accomplish just >that, and is indictable. > > > Not only individuals, but any corporation >supporting criminal syndicalism can be prosecuted, >according to Corpus Juris Secundum 46 462b. Criminal >Syndicalism. "Statutes against criminal syndicalism apply >to corporations as well as to individuals organizing or >belonging to criminal syndicalist society; evidence of the >character and activities of other organizations with which >the organization in which the accused is a member is >affiliated is admissible." > > Not only can the members of the World Order be >arrested and tried anywhere, since they function worldwide >in their conspiratorial activities to undermine and overthrow >all governments and nations, but because their >organizations are so tightly interlocked, any evidence about >any one of them can be introduced in prosecuting any >member of other organizations in any part of the U.S. or the >world. Their attempts to undermine the political and social >orders of all peoples make them subject to legal retribution. >The People of the U.S. must begin at once to enforce the >statutes outlawing criminal syndicalist activities, and bring >the criminals to justice. > >-------------------- > >Permission to reprint granted by the Committee to Restore >the Constitution. Mr. Eustace Mullins, Council Member of >Committee to Restore the Constitution, may be contacted >at Bankers Research Institute, P.O. Box 1105, Staunton, VA >24401. > >Other books by Mr. Mullins include: >Secrets of the Federal Reserve >My Life in Christ >This Difficult Individual, Ezra Pound >A Writ for Martyrs >The Curse of Canaan >Murder by Injection > <snip> ======================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. ======================================================================== [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail