Time: Fri Aug 29 09:47:44 1997
by usr05.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA16244;
Fri, 29 Aug 1997 06:54:37 -0700 (MST)
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 1997 06:53:00 -0700
To: liberty-and-justice@pobox.com
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Walter Updegrave on ZIP codes
The section of 42 U.S.C. 1981 quoted below
is a codified version of the 1866 Civil Rights Act.
This Act created federal citizenship as a franchise,
much like a McDonald's franchise, which can be
regulated, taxed, and controlled by Congress.
If you want to become hamburger for Janet Rhino,
maintain your status as a federal citizen.
The federal zone is beyond the protections of
the U.S. Constitution. See Downes v. Bidwell,
and Hooven & Allison v. Evatt, in chief.
See also Gilbertson's OPENING BRIEF in the Supreme Law
Library at the URL just below my name here.
The key which unlocks this whole mess is the Guarantee
Clause: it is does NOT obligate the United States
to guarantee a Republican Form of Government to itself --
ONLY to the several states, and it has done a poor job
of that too!!
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com
copy: Supreme Law School
At 02:08 AM 8/29/97 -0400, you wrote:
>At 06:58 PM 8/28/97 -0700, Paul wrote:
>>[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
>>
>>
>> Explanation of ZIP Code Address Purpose
>> (Version 910816Z; rev. 081991)
>>
>> by
>>
>> W. C. Updegrave
>> c/o 300 Adams Street, Esterly
>> Reading, Pennsylvania
>> zip code exempt (DMM 122.32)
>>
>> 3. Briefly put, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM) Section 111.2
>>and the copyrighted (hence, "private" and not governmental at
>>all) NATIONAL AREA ZIP CODE DIRECTORY, page 11, both identify the
>>term "United States" by using the third person, singular,
>>personal pronoun "its", which relates only to the "United States"
>>at the District of Columbia, its territories and ceded enclaves,
>>its agents and its "citizens". In this context, the term
>>"citizen of United States" has a very restricted definition --
>>cf. 26 C.F.R. 1.1-1(c) and 301.6109(g); 42 U.S.C. 1981 & 1982;
>>26 U.S.C. 3121(e); 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(9) & (10); etc.
>
>As you can see Title 42 gives rights by statute whereas the Constitution
>secures natural rights of [state] citizens.
>=========================================
>http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/42/1981.shtml
>42 § 1981. Equal rights under the law [14th Amendment Section 1???]
>
> (a) Statement of equal rights
>
> All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the
>same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to
>sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all
>laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed
>by **white citizens**, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains,
>penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other.
>
>http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/42/1982.shtml
>42 USC § 1982. Property rights of citizens
>
> All citizens of the United States shall have the same right, in every
>State and Territory, as is enjoyed by **white citizens** thereof to inherit,
>purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal property.
>==================================
>Which also explains why Estate tax (in Subtitle B) is not applicable to
>'foreign estates or trusts', where 'foreign' is 'without' the federal
>states, and 'within' the states of the Union. Where Congress can 'give' a
>Right, where supposedly none existed before, it can take away or tax.
>
>I hate this 'white' vs others specification as I know I am not a bigot, but
>this is the first evidence I have seen to Wangrud's postition on 'white
>citizens'.
>
>This is pretty scary stuff.
>========================================================
>Brad Barnhill
>e:bradbva@chv.mindspring.com
>========================================================
>"The government which steps out of the ranks of the
>ordinary articles of consumption to select and lay under
>disproportionate burdens a particular one because it is
>a comfort, pleasing to the taste or necessary to the
>health and will therefore be bought, is in that
>particular a tyranny."
> --Thomas Jefferson to Samuel Smith, 1823.
> http://pages.prodigy.com/jefferson_quotes/
>========================================================
>
>ÿ-ÿ-ÿ-ÿ-ÿ-ÿ-ÿ-ÿ-ÿ-ÿ-ÿ-ÿ-ÿ-ÿ-ÿ-ÿ
>Unsub info - send e-mail to majordomo@majordomo.pobox.com, with
>"unsubscribe liberty-and-justice" in the body (not the subject)
>Liberty-and-Justice list-owner is Mike Goldman <whig@pobox.com>
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell : Counselor at Law, federal witness
B.A., Political Science, UCLA; M.S., Public Administration, U.C. Irvine
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU
website: http://www.supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal.
========================================================================
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail