Time: Sun Oct 12 06:00:19 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA07297; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 05:59:32 -0700 (MST) by usr02.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA12332; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 05:59:06 -0700 (MST) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 1997 05:58:19 -0700 To: Bill Teague <bteague@inlink.com> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: "Paper Terrorism" by Rep. Karen Schmidt Cc: <psc@u.washington.edu> Hello Bill, The State Attorney General's office called me last week, and we had a very brief but cordial conversation. I told them it was not proper for me to receive two (2) identical and anonymous fax transmissions, without any identification whatsoever. This is actually a violation of federal law. Then, I got a letter two days ago with the State AG's name on the outside of the envelope. I refused it, because it exhibited "AZ 85719". I returned it with a SASE prepaid and with the proper mailing location; all they need to do is to re-mail the letter, in the envelope I provided, at my expense of course. I have also provided to their office complimentary copies of my OFFER TO PROVE RACKETEERING (by DOJ), which offer was recently filed in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, here in Tucson. Lastly, I have mailed to Rep. Schmidt an administrative NOTICE AND DEMAND for her to show cause why she should not be charged with violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, 47 U.S.C. 227 et seq. She has until October 17, 1997, to answer. Her silence in this matter will be treated as consent to the presumption I am making, namely, that she violated federal law when those faxes were transmitted to me, without first obtaining my permission. "Paper terrorism," maybe? You be the judge. You will note that our fax machine annotates all out-going faxes with "Supreme Law Firm," the originating telephone number, and the time and date. This is required for any fax which is not solicited. See 47 U.S.C. 227 for details. /s/ Paul Mitchell http://supremelaw.com copy: Supreme Law School, Harold Thomas At 03:45 AM 10/12/97 -0500, you wrote: > >hey Paul, > >Just thought I'd send this your way. I have recv'd NO >response whatsoever from Schmidt's ofc ... nada. Not >even a form letter acknowledgement of rcpt. > >Bill > > >>Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 02:20:03 -0500 >>To: schmidt_ka@leg.wa.gov. >>From: Bill Teague <bteague@inlink.com> >> >>10/2/97 >> >> >>Dear Representative Schmidt, >> >>It has come to my attention that you put your name to >>the following official Washington State memo and as >>Chairman of the Organized Crime Advisory Board caused >>it to be distributed to all Washington State lawmakers. >> >>I also understand that you did not author this unusual >>document but I would like to know if you even are aware >>of what it puts forth. One hears so much these days about >>legislators putting their signature to documents, legislation >>and God knows what else, without having even first read what >>it is they are signing that I thought I should give you the benefit >>of doubt and and ask first before jumping to any conclusions. >>In other words, Representative Schmidt, did you read it? >> >>And if so, how could you not question at least some of the >>rather awful judgements it makes against otherwise >>constitutional and *legal* speech and deeds that might >>be used or engaged in by individual citizens of this country? >> >>As far as I know it's not illegal, for instance, in and of itself, >>to hand out pamphlets educating someone on certain legal >>*responsibilities* they have when they sit in judgement of their >>peers in a court of law. >> >>Nor are these *illegal* or unconstitutional activities in and of >>themselves: >> >>-- Challenging judges in an effort to disqualify them on a current case >> >>-- using the Internet to promote extremist ideas >> >>-- the establishment and use of Common Law Courts >> >>In fact, Rep. Schmidt, when State law enforcement officials >>imply such things are somehow *illegal*, as the 'memo' >>clearly does, then complaints such officials would make >>along the lines of this: >> >>[from the memo] >> >>[q} >> >>Since the early 1990's there has been a noticeable increase in >>the number of people across the country who have joined and >>continue to participate in the anti-government movement. These >>individuals view themselves as victims of a government conspiracy >>to take away their individual rights and liberties. >> >>[unq] >> >> >>make it clear exactly WHY so many people feel their >>individual rights ARE threatened and then DO "participate in" >>so-called "anti-government movements", which is also neither >>illegal nor un-constitutional *in and of itself*. In fact, America >>has prided itself for years and years on it's ability to tolerate >>and sustain itself in the face even of groups as truly rabidly >>anti American as the Ku Klux Klan or the American Communist >>Party, or all the various "Nazi" style movements that come along. >> >>No, Rep. Schmidt, this document, coming from *within* an >>official office of your state's law enforcement agency is *truly* >>scary, un-American and unacceptable. >> >>The good people of this country are not afraid of 'kooks' as >>much as they are rightfully afraid of the kind of 'systemic' >>corruption of the lawful tenets of their constitution as are >>displayed clear as day and in plain view for God and all the >>World to see in this document. >> >>I would think it would behoove any law enforcement official >>such as yourself, Rep Schmidt, to look deeply into *how* such >>oddball and clearly *illegal* and unconstitutional advice to law >>enforcement officers got drawn up and put out in such an *offcial* >>manner as this and make concerted efforts to guaruntee that >>this kind of looney tunes "legal advice" never happens again. >> >>If I didn't know different, Rep Schmidt, I'd have looked at much >>of this document and seen a 'very' bad [typical] script for the >>old tv series "Dragnet". That or perhaps speeches by old Joe >>McCarthy or J Edger Hoover when they were alive. >> >>This truly is a sad indication of just how far 'down the >>[constitutional] pole' certain officials and agencies of >>our united states have slipped. >> >>sincerely >> >>Bill Teague >>2855 Winnebago >>St Louis, Mo 63118 >> >> >>[following, the said memo] >> >> >> State of Washington >> Washington State Patrol >> General Administration Building >> P.O. Box 42600 >> Olympia, Washington 98504-2600 >> (360) 753-6540 >> >>September 17, 1997 >> >>TO: Washington State Senators >> Washington State Representatives >> >>FROM: Representative Karen Schmidt, Chairman [sic] >> Organized Crime Advisory Board >> >>SUBJECT: Paper Terrorism >> >> >>It has been brought to my attention that anti-government >>organizations have been utilizing a tactic called "paper >>terrorism" to effectively disable government. Commonly, public >>officials are personally targeted. This widespread practice is >>accomplished by overburdening our communications, business, or >>judicial systems with frivolous or repetitive petitions, property >>liens, and small claims court actions. >> >>Enclosed is a brief explanation of this process. If you feel you >>are a victim of "paper terrorism," I encourage you to contact the >>Washington State Patrol, Organized Crime Intelligence Unit, in >>Olympia at (360) 753-3277, for assistance. >> >>KS:csp >>Enclosure >> >> PAPER TERRORISM >> >>Introduction >> >>Since the early 1990's there has been a noticeable increase in >>the number of people across the country who have joined and >>continue to participate in the anti-government movement. These >>individuals view themselves as victims of a government conspiracy >>to take away their individual rights and liberties. They do not >>recognize most forms of county, state, and federal government and >>therefore create their own self-styled government. National >>speakers in the anti-government extremists or "Patriot" movement >>conduct recruitment and information seminars across Washington >>State, as well as the entire country. These seminars and >>recruitment meetings fuel bizarre conspiracy theories and >>communicate new trends within the anti-government movement. >>Paper terrorism has grown from a trend to a full scale tactic >>used upon businesses, private individuals, government services >>and elected officials. >> >> >>Background >> >>Paper terrorism is designed to clog government services with >>meaningless requests which consume time and disrupt schedules. >>In the private sector paper terrorism is an attempt to extort >>money, goods or services. Some examples of paper terrorism >>activities: >> >>* Bogus liens placed upon personal property of government >> officials and private individuals. >> >>* Frivolous lawsuits filed in state and federal courts against >> businesses and government entices [sic]. >> >>* Drafting and passing counterfeit bank checks and other >> fraudulent negotiable instruments aimed at defrauding the >> financial community and businesses. >> >>* Common Law Courts that issue homemade subpoenas to citizens, >> businesses and government officials. >> >>* Challenging judges in an effort to disqualify them on a >> current case and to repeat their motions to disqualify these >> judges from hearing future cases by referencing the prior >> challenges. >> >>* Scheming to avoid paying state sales tax during a purchase >> by declaring to be a non resident and then filing claims >> with the state's risk management section if refused. >> >>* Disrupting the court system by persuading fellow jail >> inmates to defend themselves as Patriots, thus tying up more >> of the courts and prosecutors time. >> >>* Distributing the extremist Citizens Handbook to foster jury >> nullification. >> >>* using the Internet to promote extremist ideas such as >> "Assassination Politics" or predicting the date of death of >> a law enforcement officer or government official to win a >> cash price. >> >>* Filing bogus claims in small claims court. >> >>* Requesting information from courts, government agencies, >> elected officials and businesses in the form of frivolous >> questions in an effort to consume employee's time. >> >> >>Tell-tale signs of Patriot extremists can often be found in their >>conversation or written documents. Common indicators are >>biblical passages, referring to the state as a "republic", >>calling zip codes a "postal zone", refusing to acknowledge direct >>questions, separating their middle and last names with a comma or >>colon, placing a thumb print on a document, claiming the court >>has no authority, or using the phrases: all rights reserved, >>without prejudice, UCC 1-207, pro se, sui juris, united states, >>Black's law. >> >> >>Analysis and Trends >> >>These anti-government extremists and supporters are convinced >>citizens are being systematically oppressed by an illegal, >>totalitarian government. They believe the time for traditional >>political reform has passed, that their freedom will only be >>secured by resistance to the law and attacks against the >>government in several forms. >> >>Members of these groups bond to one another and lose contact with >>other people who hold different opinions. The isolation works to >>reinforce their views, which in turn gives them new purpose. >>This new purpose may take ordinary ideas to extremes, rationalize >>their problems into blaming government, and cause members to >>compete with each other to make stronger statements. >> >> >>Trend and Incident Reporting >> >>If you become victimized by paper terrorism, contact the >>Washington State Patrol Organized Crime Intelligence Unit at >>(360) 753-3277, extension 121. All acts reaching a criminal >>level should be referred to your local law enforcement agency or >>prosecutor's office. >> >> >>[end transcript] =========================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01 B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02 tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03 email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04 website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05 ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06 Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07 Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08 _____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09 As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10 not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11 ======================================================================== 12 [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail