Time: Tue Nov 04 15:33:27 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA28361 for [address in tool bar]; Tue, 4 Nov 1997 15:32:19 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 1997 15:32:01 -0700 To: "Gary G. Cox" <coxgg@flash.net> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in toolbar] Subject: SLF: mail coming to you Cc: pmitch@primenet.com References: <3.0.3.32.19971104121233.006bab8c@pop5.ibm.net> Gary, "SL" means "Supreme Law" "SLF" means "Supreme Law Firm" "SLL" means "Supreme Law Library" and so on. See the Supremacy Clause. Just a few items for your orientation: 1. I have added you to our electronic list of "Friends"; treat this list like a newspaper, and use it only if, and when, it is useful; we remove names upon request; 2. Familiarize yourself with all the documents in the Supreme Law Library at URL=http://supremelaw.com, because there is much there already, and a lot more is coming (SLL = Supreme Law Library); 3. The class action we discussed is a very real possibility; take the time to study the case law under 42 USCA 1983, and also read Gilbertson's OPENING BRIEF in SLL, with special emphasis on the 2 classes of citizenship; 4. The vast majority of attorneys and lawyers would want to proceed under Title 42, using a "civil rights" theory; we much prefer the powerful combination of statutes at 18 U.S.C. 241 and 242; read these statutes in reverse order: first comes the deprivation of FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, and then there is conspicy to violate same, when 2 or more conspire; 5. Effective assistance of Counsel is a fundamental Right guaranteed by the Constitution for the United States of America; as such, deprivation of this Right invokes 18 U.S.C. 242 and, if 2 or more are conspiring to perpetrate the deprivation, then it is also conspiracy, in violation of 241; 6. Whenever you have 2 state employees conspiring to violate 242, there are 4 felonies: one count for violating 242, and one count of violating 241 for the one, and one count of violating each for the other; now you see precisely why these statutes are so powerful; 7. The penalties are severe for deprivations which involve kidnapping; false imprisonment can be regarded as kidnapping; it is a matter for the jury to decide; 8. The class action I see working, is one in which we screen City Court victims into two groups: those who were native born, and those who were not; the native-born will plead a specific status which invokes the U.S. Constitution against Arizona state officials, e.g. Jay Cranshaw and his cronies; 9. A one-page flyer can be distributed with an explanation on the front page, and a sign-up/screening sheet on the back page; we will provide a mailing location, and require $10 to screen each case; we will then hire paralegals to verify the case number, name of party, nature of the case, and its disposition; if they don't qualify, we send the money back (this eliminates our liability); if they do qualify, we send back a confirmation with an application form and directions for paying $100 to join the class; 10. The City of Tucson is liable on two big counts: their Intergovernmental Agreement ("IGA") has not been renewed by the Superior Court; and, they are arraigning people without effective assistance of Counsel, in direct violation of the Sixth Amendment; even if we lose on the IGA point, there is no question but that they are arraigning people without Counsel (e.g. people who know about the IGA problem, like Us!); 11. We can negotiate a solution with the City, by moving towards a massive class action, and a bona fide settlement offer (carrot and stick), in which we propose that the settlement amount be derived from a "tax" on the airport revenues, effectively returning its control back to the City Council. 12. To confirm what I am saying to you, do two things: visit the downtown bus depot, right near the Congress Hotel, and note the name of the archways: "Ronstadt"; two, go into the City Court building downtown, begin asking who owns that building, and see how far you get; we have confidential information that it is the Ronstadt family, NOT the City of Tucson!! Need I say any more? Stay in touch. It was great to hear from you. Use this email address for private email and [address in tool bar] for public list traffic. Later! /s/ Paul Mitchell http://supremelaw.com p.s. Tell your friends about SLL. It's FREE! and its terrific (even if I do say so myself :) copies: off-site archivists At 01:42 PM 11/4/97 -0800, you wrote: >Paul: > >Good to hear from you. I was planning to send you an e-mail today just to >keep in touch. > >Hold your package for now anyway; I will give you a new address shortly. > >Been a busy day for me. The city seems to have lost my paperwork and I >wasn't arrested afterall. So they directed me to bring all my >documentation to city hall this morning. Another eye opening experience. > >Go to get going... Seeing a lawyer at 1400. Will, write later. I would >really like to talk to you about getting this airport back to the people >who built it. > >Regards, > >Gary > > =========================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01 B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02 tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03 email: [address in toolbar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04 website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05 ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06 Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07 Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08 _____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09 As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10 not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11 ======================================================================== 12 [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 10, non-proportional spacing.] 13
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail