Time: Tue Nov 18 04:50:54 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA13891;
	Tue, 18 Nov 1997 04:49:04 -0700 (MST)
	by smtp03.primenet.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id EAA28516;
	Tue, 18 Nov 1997 04:48:26 -0700 (MST)
 via SMTP by smtp03.primenet.com, id smtpd028511; Tue Nov 18 04:48:16 1997
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 04:48:33 -0800
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in toolbar] (by way of Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar])
Subject: SLS: no IGA for Tucson City Court! (fwd)

All criminal traffic matters and other
minor misdemeanor offenses are handled
by this bogus "City Court."  State law
requires that the Presiding Judge of 
the Arizona Superior Court renew the
intergovernmental agreement ("IGA")
between the County and City, authorizing
this City Court to exist in the first
instance, evey two years.  The most
recent IGA expired without any renewal,
and the City Court has been operating
without authorization ever since.  One
individual I know sat in, to witness
about $35,000 in fines imposed during
a period of less than 2 hours.  These
City Courts are scattered all over the
landscape in Tucson, Arizona.  Multiply
~$20,000/hour x 8 x number of courts,
and you have a real extortion racket
going here, even now as we speak!

To make matters worse, City Court 
routinely "arraigns" defendants without
any Counsel whatsoever, despite the 
fact that effective assistance of 
Counsel is a fundamental Right,
guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment.

So, the City of Tucson is now in the
position of being doubly liable, at Law,
for racketeering against a massive number
of Arizona Citizens, numbering at least
100,000 or more, depending on the exact
number of bogus arraignments which have
occurred in a demonstrably bogus court.

Does this answer your question?

/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://supremelaw.com




At 07:59 PM 11/17/97 -0800, you wrote:
>> 
>>              THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN
>>         THE CITY OF TUCSON AND PIMA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
>>          FOR THE PROVISION OF CITY COURT ADMINISTRATION
>> 
>
>What is the significance of this document?
>
>Thanks,
>
<snip>

===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris      : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA;   M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email:   [address in toolbar]        : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com       : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best 06
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone 07
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 10, non-proportional spacing.] 13



      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail