Time: Tue Nov 18 07:59:41 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA21412;
Tue, 18 Nov 1997 07:56:51 -0700 (MST)
by smtp03.primenet.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA06846;
Tue, 18 Nov 1997 07:56:31 -0700 (MST)
via SMTP by smtp03.primenet.com, id smtpd006835; Tue Nov 18 07:56:14 1997
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 07:56:32 -0800
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Committee to Restore the Constitution (fwd)
<snip>
>
>Shouldn't we all be trying to get our legislatures to do what
>Wisconsin is doing???? I've already contacted one of my
>representatives about this.
>
>And you...?
>
>
>------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
>To: liberty-and-justice@pobox.com
>Subject: L&J: Fwd: Committee to Restore the Constitution
>From: alan_friend@juno.com (Alan Friend)
>Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 09:51:30 EST
>Reply-to: liberty-and-justice@pobox.com
>
>COMMITTEE TO RESTORE THE CONSTITUTION, Inc
>Post Office Box 986 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522
>--------------------------------
>
>
>Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 07:43:39 -0700
>TESTIMONY, Archibald E Roberts, LtCol, AUS, ret, Director,
>Committee to Restore the Constitution
>
>RE: Wisconsin Assembly Joint Resolution 67, " Memorializing
>Members of Congress to cease certain activities concerning the
>United Nations.."
>
>(Extended and modified for clarity) Public hearing, directed by
>State-Federal Relations Committee, Representative Gregg A
>Underheim, Chairman, 29 October 1997, State Capitol, Madison.
>_________________________________________________________________
>_
>
>Chairman Underheim and members of the State-Federal Relations
>Committee, I am Archibald Roberts, Director of the Committee to
>Restore the Constitution, Fort Collins, Colorado.
>
>I am here at the invitation of Mrs. Virginia Meves, publisher of
>Wisconsin Report.
>
>I am here also on behalf of other Wisconsin citizens, some of
>whom are here today, who seek appropriate action by this
>Committee and by the State of Wisconsin, legislative action to
>expose and neutralize the men and the system engaged in a
>conspiracy to overthrow the Constitution of the United States and
>erect a United Nations new world order on ruins of the Republic.
>
>Mr. Chairman and members, I testify in support of Assembly Joint
>Resolution 67.
>
>First, the citizens of Wisconsin want this Committee, and the
>State Legislature, to approve Assembly Joint Resolution 67, which
>states in part, "memorializing members of Congress to cease
>certain activities concerning the United Nations and directing
>distribution."
>
>Mr. Chairman, you are the sponsor of this resolution, with other
>co-sponsors in House and Senate, Wisconsin State Legislature.
>
>For purpose of record I include a portion of Assembly Joint
>Resolution 67, which states as follows, and I quote: "Resolved
>that the Assembly, the Senate concurring, that the legislature of
>the State of Wisconsin memorialize the US Congress to cease
>appropriating US funds for any military activity that Congress
>has not authorized. To cease engaging in military activity under
>the authority of the United Nations or any world body. To cease
>giving aid to any activity under the jurisdiction of the United
>Nations and to cease supporting the establishment of a new world
>order or any form of global government, and to refrain from
>taking any further steps toward the economic political merger of
>the United States into a world body or any form of world
>government."
>
>It is important that the political reality of the United Nations
>new world order be realized. That is the purpose of this hearing,
>Mr. Chairman. We appreciate the opportunity to bring the facts
>about the United Nations before the legislators of the State of
>Wisconsin.
>
>The authority for this meeting is two-fold. First, the people
>from whom flow all political power. The citizens of the State of
>Wisconsin have the responsibility to instruct their elected
>officials in the State of Wisconsin to direct their agents in
>Washington to confine the functions of government to limitations
>defined in the Constitution.
>
>Secondly, the State. The original 13 States, Mr. Chairman and
>members, created the federal government by the first three
>articles of the Constitution establishing the Executive,
>Legislative and Judicial Departments. Therefore, the States are
>the Principals under this contract and are not subservient to
>agencies or agents in Washington. Every succeeding State entered
>the Union of States on an equal footing with every other State.
>
>It is incumbent upon the State of Wisconsin, as a Principal under
>the constitutional contract to correct violations of that
>contract and to do it in a manner compatible with the authority
>of the Constitution. It is a further request of the citizens of
>the State of Wisconsin, that the Federal-State Legislative
>Committee amend Assembly Joint Resolution 67 to add instructions
>to Attorney General James Doyle that he file in the Supreme Court
>of the United States a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment
>Injunctive and Other Equitable Relief against Mr. Kofi Annan,
>Secretary General, United Nations Organization.
>
>Authority for State filing in the Supreme Court is found under
>"original jurisdiction." Original jurisdiction is defined in
>Article III, Section 2, Constitution of the United States.
>
>I quote the law as it appears in the Constitution. Article III,
>Section 2, states:
>
> "In all cases affecting ambassadors and other public
> ministers and
>
> counsels and those in which a state shall be a party, the
> Supreme
>
> Court shall have original jurisdiction."
>
>Original jurisdiction. Mr. Chairman, and members of this
>Committee, you have the authority and responsibility to initiate
>corrective action by bringing into court, the Supreme Court of
>the United States, the Director of the United Nations
>Organization.
>
>The procedure, that is the method by which this is and can be
>done, is outlined in detail in a 30 page brief prepared by Judge
>J.J. Boesel, ret, in which it is specifically pointed out that
>Articles 36 and 43 of the UN Charter are unconstitutional,
>because they amend the Constitution without consent of 3/4ths of
>the States in violation of the prohibitions of Article V,
>Constitution of the United States. Laws passed under authority of
>the UN Treaty are unconstitutional for the same reason. I refer
>you to Reid v. Covert, 354 USI 1957:
>
>"It would be manifestly contrary to the objectives of those who
>created the Constitution; let alone alien to our entire
>constitutional history and tradition to construe Article VI (the
>Supremacy Clause) as permitting the United States to exercise
>power under an international agreement without observing
>constitutional prohibitions. In effect, such construction would
>permit amendment of that document in a manner not sanctioned by
>Article V."
>
>This legal brief, 30 pages, is available on a floppy disk for
>ease of adaptation by the Attorney General, State of Wisconsin.
>
>It is important to provide evidence, documentary evidence, in
>presenting these serious charges. The first I bring to your
>attention is the fact that the Senate of the United States has
>declared that the "Charter of the United Nations has become the
>supreme law of the land." (Senate Document 87, "Review of the
>United Nations Charter," p. 289.) Members of the Senate of the
>United States have violated their oath of office to defend and
>preserve the Constitution of the United States.
>
>Senate Document 87 further states, "the position of this
>country," that is the United States, "in the family of nations
>forbids trafficking in innocuous generalities but demands that
>every State in the Union," including Wisconsin, "accept and act
>upon the Charter according to its plain language and unmistakable
>purpose and direction."
>
>Mr. Chairman and members, this is treason. We are dealing with
>violations of the Constitution on a grand scale to change this
>Republic into a world government body. As a matter of fact, we
>have evidence to show the involvement of the highest ranking
>members of Congress and the Administration in this conspiracy.
>
>One of these exhibits is Senate Joint Resolution 65, 16 March
>1993, "Establishing a commission to study the establishment of an
>international military force under the United Nations Charter."
>This is a document, this is not an opinion, this is a document.
>Being a document it is important that it be taken seriously.
>
>Senate Joint Resolution 65 states in part: "Whereas under Article
>43 of the United Nations Charter, the Secretary General is
>authorized to negotiate agreements for the creation of a
>multinational standing military force, to be used for
>peacekeeping and peace enforcement . There is established the
>`Commission on United States Participation in a Permanent United
>Nations Peacekeeping Force.'"
>
>I further point out Mr. Chairman and members of the Committee,
>Presidential Decision Directive 25. Presidential Decision
>Directive 25, dated 3 May 1994, is classified. Not even Members
>of Congress have a complete copy of this Presidential
>Declaration. I have a State Department Summary as published in
>one of our bulletins. This document reveals transfer of command
>and control of US forces to the Security Council, United Nations.
>
>
>Presidential Decision Directive 25, Article V, states, and I
>quote: "Our policy will be on a case by case basis, the President
>will consider placing appropriate US forces under the operational
>control of a competent UN commander for specific UN operations
>authorized by the UN Treaty."
>
>As you see, the alleged authority for treasonous Senate Joint
>Resolution 65, and Presidential Decision Directive 25, is the
>United Nations Treaty. Gentlemen, I have here a copy of the
>United Nations Treaty and quote specific UN articles affecting
>transfer of US military forces to United Nations Security Council
>Command.
>
>Article 25, "The Members of the United Nations agree to accept
>and carry out decisions of the Security Council in accordance
>with the present Charter."
>
>Article 26, "In order to promote the establishment and
>maintenance of international peace and security with the least
>diversion for armaments of the world's human and economic
>resources, the Security Council shall be responsible for
>formulating, with the assistance of the Military Staff Committee
>referred to in Article 47, plans to be submitted to the Members
>of the United nations for the establishment of a system for the
>regulation of armaments."
>
>Article 43, "All Members of the United Nations, in order to
>contribute to the maintenance of international peace and
>security, undertake to make available to the Security Council, on
>its call and in accordance with a special agreement or
>agreements, armed forces, assistant, and facilities, including
>rights of passage, necessary for the purpose of maintaining
>international peace and security."
>
>Mr. Chairman, the prosecution has revealed that the United
>Nations Charter is, in reality, a Constitution for a "new world
>order."
>
>The prosecution has shown that the United Nations objective is to
>exploit the United States military to force all nations into line
>and deliver them up to a world government.
>
>The prosecution has demonstrated that federal agents have
>contrived to establish a "world government administration" in
>Washington.
>
>In consonance with evidence of gross violation of the oath of
>office, "To Defend and Preserve the Constitution of the United
>States against all enemies, foreign and domestic," by elected
>officials, citizens of Wisconsin request that this State-Federal
>Relations Committee initiate the following corrective actions:
>
>1. Amend Assembly Joint Resolution 67, adding instructions to
>Attorney General James Doyle that he file in the Supreme Court of
>the United States, "A Complaint for Declaratory Judgment,
>Injunctive and Other Equitable Relief," against Mr. Kofi Annan,
>Secretary General, United Nations Organization, under authority
>of "original jurisdiction," Article III, Section 2, Constitution
>of the United States. Instrument for State Legislative action is
>a 30 page legal brief prepared by Judge J.J. Boesel, ret.
>
>2. Present amended Assembly Joint Resolution 67 to Senate and
>House, Wisconsin State Legislature, for approval and appropriate
>action. Chairman Underheim and members of the Committee, your
>constituents ask you to protect their families and property
>against a predatory "world government administration" in
>Washington.
>
>Citizens of Wisconsin request that you begin the process of
>terminating United Nations operations in the United States and
>recover billions of tax-dollars illegally granted to the United
>Nations by Congress in violations of their oath to " protect and
>preserve the Constitution."
>==========================================================
>Archibald E Roberts, LtCol, AUS, ret, Director COMMITTEE TO
>RESTORE THE CONSTITUTION, Inc Post Office Box 986 Fort Collins,
>Colorado 80522 -------------------------------- Return-Path:
><comminc@webaccess.net>
>
>Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 07:43:39 -0700
>
<snip>
===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail