Time: Sun Nov 23 10:36:51 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA06254;
	Sun, 23 Nov 1997 10:36:27 -0700 (MST)
	by smtp04.primenet.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA05066;
	Sun, 23 Nov 1997 10:29:45 -0700 (MST)
 via SMTP by smtp04.primenet.com, id smtpd005055; Sun Nov 23 10:29:30 1997
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 1997 10:29:23 -0800
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Russian/Chinese/American joint venture at LONG BEACH (fwd)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<snip>
>
>>From: Angie Carlson <angie@connectnet.com>
>>Subject: ALERT: Russian/Chinese/American joint venture at LONG BEACH
>>
>>I bring you this most critical data with a very heavy heart, indeed.  I
>>hope you will take the time to read this article very carefully, then read
>>the following posts on the same topic.  
>>
>>I want to talk about betrayal, treason, and probably, the ultimate
>>subversion of the United States and its people, to agents foreign and
>>domestic.   The particular case I’m going to talk about has to do with
>>NATIONAL SUICIDE, fully exposed, as far as I know it to be.  Am I being
>>rather dramatic?   You decide, after reading this article, and more
>>forthcoming on this subject.
>>
>>On Friday 21, 1997, I interviewed Joseph Farah, of the Western Journalism
>>Center, about this sin against the nation, this ultimate betrayal.
>>
>>As you know, I was one of the people exposing the Long Beach giveaway to
>>China. The Long Beach Naval Base was one of the numerous US military bases
>>closed, and Long Beach on September 30, 1994.  Long Beach Naval Station and
>>Shipyard were designated for closure by the 1991 and 1995 military base
>>Closures and Realignment Commissions.  9,519 longshoremen and other workers
>>were made redundant.
>>
>>We were told that since Communism had collapsed, the Soviet Union no longer
>>existed with its expansionist ideas, and so forth, that we know longer
>>needed to spend billions of dollars on defense, that in fact, the country
>>would be better served if the money went towards domestic uses.  By the
>>way, this is exactly what was said in the 1930s, in post WWI Europe, in
>>Britain specifically, and the result was that Germany and Japan quietly but
>>persistently and methodically, built up their war making machinery.
>>Britain thought she could diplomatically appease Germany and Japan by
>>meeting some of their demands.  The thinking being that the two nations
>>would remain obediently acquiescent, and Germany to the 
>>Versailles Treaty demands, which was very one sided against Germany, and
>>was the instrument that really forced Germany’s impoverishment, by forcing
>>her to pay prohibitive and exorbitant payments to the nations that she was
>>blamed for ravishing in W.W.I.   
>>
>>This diplomatic rational was dubbed Appeasement.  Well, the same exact
>>thing is occurring today but with the United States and China, and it was
>>really accomplished in 1972, with the advent of the Shanghai Communiqué.
>>
>>I recently became aware of an incredible venture.  In fact, a mind
>>boggling, (besides the Long Beach Port giveaway to the PLA, which is bad
>>enough in itself), and sinister scheme taking place right next door to Long
>>Beach.    Something called SEA LAUNCH, WHICH IS AN INTERNATIONAL VENTURE
>>LED BY THE  RUSSIAN ROCKET FIRM CALLED RSC-ENERGIA AND THE US AEROSPACE
>>GIANT BOEING CORP.
>>
>>The venture is progressed to the point where finishing touches will be
>>complete this month, on a facility controlling a floating, offshore
>>rocket-launching pad capable of blasting satellites into orbit.
>>
>>According to Russian and US military-intelligence, the RSC-ENERGIA IS
>>CONTROLLED BY THE GRU, THE RUSSIAN MILITARY-INTELLIGENCE SUCCESSOR TO THE
>>KGB.  Get this, CHINA AND RUSSIA SIGNED A SECRET SPY-PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
>>IN 1992, AND INTELLIGENCE SOURCES SAY THIS IS A FAIT ACCOMPLIS TO THAT PACT.
>>
>>So, in effect, BEIJING, TEAMED WITH RUSSIA AND A US COMPANY, WILL OWN A
>>VERY VALUABLE PORT, AND THE ONLY REAL DEEP WATER NAVAL BASE ON US SOIL,
>>FROM WHICH THEY CAN TRANSFER SECRET HIGH-TECH EQUIPMENT BACK TO THE
>>PEOPLE’S LIBERATION ARMY in sealed containers aboard huge COSCO ships.  Can
>>you imagine the US military technology that will be readily available to
>>both Russia and China through this extraordinary, multi-national SEA LAUNCH
>>PROJECT.  
>>
>>IF THIS IS NOT NATIONAL SUICIDE, I DON'T KNOW WHAT ANYONE WOULD CALL IT,
>>KNOWING CHINA’S GOVERNMENT AND RULING APPARATUS.   THIS IS ULTIMATE TREASON
>>TAKING PLACE IN THE NAME OF FREE TRADE.  This is not the Ship of Troy here.
>> We are talking of US representatives literally robbing the assets and
>>security of the US, and in front of our very eyes, just handing them on a
>>silver platter to our sworn enemies.  LET ME PLEASE REMIND YOU THAT IN THE
>>March/April FOREIGN AFFAIRS ISSUE, in an excerpt of Bernstein’s and Ross H.
>>Munro’s book, “THE COMING CONFLICT WITH CHINA”, THEY QUOTE President JIANG
>>ZEMIN visit to the US, which just occurred, of course.  They write that
>>"the American populace will see this visit as a sign of a restored sense of
>>common interests.  However, they warn “influential Chinese planners like
>>general Mi Zhenyu, who is the vice-commandant of the academy of military
>>sciences in Beijing, will see it as the next step 
>>in bringing china’s strength and influence up to par with the United
States."
>>
>>This is what vice-commandant Mi Zhenyu of the Academy of Military Sciences
>>in Beijing wrote in “MEGATRENDS CHINA BEIJING; HUALING PUBLISHING HOUSE,
>>MAY 1996, “FOR A RELATIVELY LONG TIME IT WILL BE ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY THAT
>>WE QUIETLY NURSE OUR SENSE OF VENGEANCE.  WE MUST CONCEAL OUR ABILITIES AND
>>BIDE OUR TIME.”  
>>
>>WHAT ABOUT RUSSIA AND HER TRUE GOALS TOWARDS THE WORLD AND THE US
>>specifically? WELL, THE GORBACHEV FOUNDATION USA PAPERS CLEARLY STATE THAT
>>THE FOUNDATION IS CREATING A NATIONAL TASK FORCE ON US BASE CLOSING.  AND
>>IT IS CO-CHAIRED BY FORMER SAN JOSE MAYOR TOM MCENERY AND FORMER DEM. REP.,
>>MEL LEVINE.  In the same paper, the SAN JOSE MERCURY April 21, 1991, in a
>>rare article, when Gorbachev was asked the question would he ever return to
>>politics, he said, “I NEVER LEFT POLITICS.”   And, of course, let us not
>>forget his famous recent citing that he will always remain a communist.
>>
>>COSCO IS BAD ENOUGH:  AND you will remember perhaps it commands a 600-ship
>>fleet with a very shady recent past.    
>>
>>According to THE CENTER OF WESTERN JOURNALISM, in his article exposing this
>>project SEA LAUNCH, Farah says that according to intelligence sources, (WHO
>>TALKED TO INSIGHT MAGAZINE, the CHINESE HAVE SPECIFIC ROLES IN THE PLA’S
>>PLAN FOR EAST ASIA AND ANY FUTURE WAR WITH TAIWAN.  ONE OF THOSE OBJECTIVES
>>IS TO STEAL SOPHISTICATED TECHNOLOGY FROM THE WEST IN PEACETIME.  “THEIR
>>STRATEGIC THINKING IS VERY SIMILAR TO THE JAPANESE IN THE 1930S.  SOONER OR
>>LATER THEY ARE GOING TO CONFRONT US ON WHO IS GOING TO BE THE BOSS OUT IN
>>EAST ASIA.” 
>>
>>Farah continues, "THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION DECISION SEEMS TO BE FINAL."
>>I NEED TO VERIFY THIS FURTHER, BUT TO THE BEST OF MY UNDERSTANDING, Boeing
>>has purchased the property.  So, Farah tells me, "right now, our national
>>security concerns, if you can believe this, rest in the hands of some city
>>officials in Long Beach, most of whom are dazzled by vague promises that
>>some 600 jobs which will be supposedly created and millions of dollars will
>>be pumped into the local economy by the construction and operation of the
>>two facilities."  
>>
>>Both Farah and I discussed the question that we must all ponder, "we must
>>all ask, WHAT SORT OF GOVERNMENT DO WE HAVE, THAT SUCH A MONUMENTAL
>>DECISION COULD BE MADE WITHOUT ANY DEBATE, WITHOUT ANY REFERENDUM, ANY
>>CONGRESSIONAL ACTION, SECURITY REVIEW, ETC."  WHAT HAS BECOME OF THE USA,
>>ANYWAY?  HAVE WE LOST OUR NATION COMPLETELY, TO A PACK OF OPPORTUNISTS?
>>
>>****  WHAT IS SEA LAUNCH  ***  Farah explained "Well, at this point of the
>>SEA LAUNCH PROJECT, the materials for SEA LAUNCH tell us that this is a
>>limited partnership of BOEING COMMERCIAL SPACE COMPANY (40) percent, and
>>NORWAY’S KVAERNER MARITIME (20) percent, RUSSIA’S RSC ENERGIA (25) percent
>>and UKRAINE’S KB YUZHNOYE/PO YUZHMASH (15).  BOEING’S papers say “It’s
>>closer than you think, and better than you had imagined.”   Well the
>>company is telling us that the wave of the future is in launching
>>satellites into orbit.  They say the future is in LONG BEACH, not Cape
>>Canaveral.  IT APPEARS THAT MAJOR CONSTRUCTION IS NEARLY COMPLETED ON
>>SOMETHING CALLED THE ODYSSEY, which is the fist mobile, marine,
>>rocket-launching facility in the world, THE ODYSSEY IS BASED IN LONG 
>>BEACH.  AND, BY THE SUMMER OF 1998, A RUSSIAN-UKRAINIAN ROCKET IS SCHEDULED
>>TO 
>>BLAST OFF FROM THE ODYSSEY NEAR CHRISTMAS ISLAND IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN,
WHICH 
>>WILL SEND A NEW GENERATION HUGHES COMMUNICATION SATELLITE INTO A STATIONARY 
>>ORBIT 22,300 MILES ABOVE EARTH.  THE VERY HEART OF THE SEA LAUNCH CONCEPT
>>IS A HIGHLY AUTOMATED LAUNCH SYSTEM DEVELOPED BY THE SOVIET MILITARY.  The
>>Ukrainian company KB YUZHNOYE/PO YUZHMASH was one of the main producers of
>>Soviet intercontinental ballistic missiles.
>>
>>As Farah aptly reminds us, "Of additional concern to Americans is the
>>proximity of another unusual foreign base of operations--the future port
>>facility of the Chinese Overseas Shipping Co.  COSCO is not only one of the
>>largest commercial shipping companies in the world, it is also, as
>>previously shown, a front for the Chinese military and Beijing intelligence
>>services."
>>
>>Farah asks, "could the COSCO base serve as a key listening post for
>>sensitive defence and high-tech secrets?  Will it serve as a hub for
>>secreting out of the United states sophisticated military technology?  Or
>>is this facility to serve as command central for a joint Russian-Chinese
>>intelligence-gathering operation?"
>>
>>Farah continues with the facts that I'm well aware of.  "There is plenty of
>>reason for concern.  On April 23, 1997, Russia and China served notice on
>>the West that they would begin coordinating foreign policy in an attempt to
>> challenge America's domination of global policy.  The longtime adversaries
>>[supposedly] put differences aside because of Russia's concerns over NATO
>>expansion and China's anger at accusations of human rights violations."
>>
>>"This meeting is of paramount importance, and may be of historic importance
>>in shaping the destiny of the 21st century," said President Yeltsin before
>>signing the agreement with China's strongman Jiang Zemin." Farah reminds us
>>that "the pact was just the latest example of the new levels of cooperation
>>reached between Moscow and Beijing.  But those new relations are much
>>deeper than they appear on the surface, according to intelligence sources
>>and some published reports."  Insight Magazine reported May 26, 1997, that
>>Chinese agents have formed a secret partnership with Russian military
>>intelligence.  Signed in 1992, this joint agreement provides for the
>>intercepting of signals from satellites and the breaking into private and
>>government computer systems, according to a former high-ranking Russian
>>military intelligence agent who was stationed in Beijing."
>>
>>"They share sensitive information with the goal of destroying the United
>>States," the agent was quoted as saying.  He specifically pointed to the
>>Long Beach port facility as one designed as a joint Chinese-Russian
>>intelligence operation."
>>
>>Farah adds ruefully, "While the COSCO plan has met with severe opposition
>>from area residents, most seem blithely unaware that Long Beach is about to
>>become the new Cape Canaveral--at least in terms of future commercial
>>satellite launches.  Yet, of the two projects, Sea Launch is easily the
>>most sensational and would seem to be equally controversial."    
>>
>>Boeing papers tell us "how it would work.  "Boeing has overall project
>>management responsibilities.  The Norwegian company Kvaerner will build the
>>sea platform from which the rockets will be launched.  The Ukrainian firm
>>will manufacture the two-state Zenit rockets upon which the Sea Launch
>>rocket and other launch support systems rest."  Farah informs us "Energia
>>of Russia, by the way, is the same company that operates the troubled Mir
>>space station.  The port facility at Long Beach will be equipped with
>>satellite processing buildings and all of the support infrastructure for
>>the oceangoing launch platform.  Rockets and satellites will be integrated
>>at the home port, with launches taking place from the 31,000,
>>semi-submersible, mobile plat from out at sea.  The project envisions 60
>>rocket launches a year by 2010.  
>>
>>"Hugh[es] Space and Communications international Inc. has signed up for at
>>least 10 launches on the new system in the next five years, plus an
>>undisclosed number of options.
>>
>>"Sea Launch is another solution to what we see as a need for assured access
>>to launch vehicles and launch slots over the next few years.."  explained
>>Hughes Chairman Donals Cromer.  "Hughes has a backlog of 41 (as of the end
>>of 1995) satellites to be launched."  
>>
>>Interestingly, Hughes is also negotiating deals with the Chinese for
>>continued access to their "Long March" vehicles, according to Cromer.
>>
>>The Sea Launch vehicle is designed to carry multiple payloads and can
>>accommodate all western spacecraft designs.  the control ship can carry as
>>many as three full integrated launch vehicles at a time.  Meanwhile, as the
>>Odyssey platform and control ship make their way back to Long Beach, new
>>satellites and launch vehicles can be integrated for the next run.
>>
>>The Odyssey can travel at better than 13 knots on pontoons bigger than a
>>Trident submarine.  It is as tall as a 210-story building an can reportedly
>>ride out hurricane-force winds without spilling a cup of coffee.  Some time
>>early next year, the Odyssey is scheduled to begin its journey to Long
>>Beach after being equipped for launches at the Vyborg Shipyard in Russia.
>>The conversion from oil rig to launch pad was s mase over the last year at
>>Rosenborg Shipyard in Stavanger, Norway.
>>
>>Because Odyssey, which is 430 feet long and 220 feet wide, is too big to
>>pass through the Panama Canal, it will have to sail around Cape Horn, known
>>for ferocious seas.  If sailing gets too rough, the Odyssey can fill up its
>>pontoons with 15,000 tons of water and partly submerge 70 feet into the
>>water--adding tremendous stability to the craft.  The trip is expected to
>>take between 75 and 90 days.  While Sea Launch may not be well-known yet in
>>Southern California, it won't be a secret much longer.
>>
>>"When this thing comes to Long Beach, it will be some sight." says Terrance
>>Scott, Boeing's spokesman for Sea Launch.  It's probably bigger than any
>>building in the city."
>>
>>With Sea Launch, satellites will be mated to rockets at Long Beach inside a
>>650-foot ship, now under construction in Glasgow, Scotland.  The ship also
>>provides mission-control facilities and travels with Odyssey to launch
>>sites.  Because the most efficient place to launch satellites into
>>geosynchronous orbit is from the equator, the first launch is scheduled to
>>take place off Christmas Island, about 1,000 miles south of Hawaii.
>>
>>Despite France's opposition, the World Bank, is guaranteeing two separate
>>$100- million commercial bank loans to Energia and Yuzhnoye to help
>>facilitate in their participation in this international project.  France
>>objected at a meeting of the lending board in the spring of 1997 because of
>>concern that some of the rocket technology involved might be used for
>>military purposes.
>>
>>"Sea Launch exemplifies a new, ground-breaking era in industrial
>>cooperation in which former Cold war enemies are now working together in a
>>non-military context to put commercial satellites into orbit," gushed World
>>Bank Vice President, Johannes Linn.
>>
>>BUT, BESIDES MAKING MONEY BY LAUNCHING SATELLITES, WHAT'S THE REAL GAME
>>PLAN BEHIND "SEA LAUNCH"?
>>
>>ON April 29, 1997, Boeing ANNOUNCED THAT IT HAD BECOME AN EQUITY PARTNER IN
>>TELEDISIC CORPORATION, A PRIVATELY HELD COMPANY WHOSE MAJOR INVESTORS ARE
>>MICROSOFT CHAIRMAN BILL GATES AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS PIONEER CRAIG McCAW.
>>Teledesic's goal is to create an "Internet-in-the-sky" -- a network of
>>low-Earth-orbit satellites that will provide broadband Internet access,
>>videoconferencing and interactive multimedia with quality close to fiber
>>optic level.  Boeing will serve as the prime contractor and assemble an
>>international team to complete the project by 2002.  At least 300
>>satellites will have to be launched to accomplish the plan.
>>
>>"Boeing shares Teledesic's vision of building a global satellite network
>>that will extend the most advanced information services to the far reaches
>>of the earth," said Phil Condit, Boeing's chairman and chief executive
>>officer.
>>
>>Boeing recently acquired Rockwell International Corp., a competing
>>aerospace company and merged with McDonnell Douglas, another long-time
rival.
>>
>>Our relationship with Teledesic is the perfect catalyst for bringing
>>together all our historical investments in the space business with our
>>recent and planned investments in Sea Launch, Rockwell and McDonnell
>>Douglas," explained Condit.        
>>
>>The Teledesic Network promises to be a major component of a New World
>>Information Order for the 21st century.  And it would not be possible
>>without Sea Launch.
>>
>>[IMAGINE 300 SATELLITES FROM THIS THING ORBITING AROUND THE GLOBE, AROUND
>>THE CLOCK.  WILL THEY MISS SEEING ANYTHING?]
>>
>>Meanwhile, all systems appear to be in Long Beach.  Allen Ashby, a former
>>Boeing executive and now president of Sea Launch said reports on the
>>various components of the system are all good.  He's excited about the
>>prospects of next year's first launch involving his multinational team.
>>
>>"I feel like I'm part of a Tom Clancy book," he says.
>>
>>Unfortunately, Tom Clancy didn't write this thriller--and no one is
>>completely sure where the final act of this script will take us, concludes
>>Journalist Joseph Farah, ominously.
>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>Except for some of my remarks, I thank Investigative Reporter, Joseph Farah
>>for this report.  For $10.00, you can receive a 64-page detailed report of
>>this newest globalist adventure and a 3-hour audio tape.
>>
>>Call (916) 852-6300
>>FAX:  (916) 852-6302
>>
>>Also, you radio people on this list, please consider interviewing Joseph
>>Farah, to make this information widespread. 
>>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>>House of Representatives  April 15, 1997
>>
>>"....  The additional BRACC cuts in base closings and realignments have
>>cost thousands to millions of jobs in the State of California, [and
>>numerous other states].  The people of Long Beach have lost thousands of
>>those jobs, as we did at Kelly Air Force Base, as we did at El Toro and
>>Miramar, and the sifting of different assets.  But, Mr. Speaker, that is
>>not all.  ...COSCO that delivered to the State of California 2,000 AK-47s.
>> Their CEO is Communist China, all owned and coordinated and controlled by
>>Communist China.  Yet, they delivered over 2,000 AK-47s into our country,
>>with the intent of selling these arms to our inner cities to disrupt our
>>inner cities, and disrupt our political environment within the United
>>States of America.
>>
>>Mr. Speaker, in the President's budget that he submitted, he gave free, no
>>strings, gave to Communist China $50 million to burn a coal burning plant,
>>after these meetings and after these DNC fund-raisers from the Chinese.  He
>>can cut impact aid or education, but he can also give $50,000 million to
>>Communist China in the name of trade and just give it.  That is not fair
>>trade.  He also gave a multimillion dollar loan to build 5 Communist
>>Chinese ships, at the port in Alabama...."
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
>>You ain't seen nothing yet, Congressman Hunter, et al.  And, don't forget
>>the deal in the 1998 defense-authorization bill, which blunts a House
>>measure to ban the Chinese Ocean Shipping Co. from Long Beach.  And how are
>>you overpaid, racketeering impotents going to deal with Sea Launch.  I
>>suggest you all go to bed at night dreaming of what happened to all the
>>lawyers, politicians and judges in Rwanda, when the Patriotic Front came
>>in.  This is not a threat, just the natural order of things in the end, and
>>usually by those who bribed and koddled you into treason.  
>>
>>Angie
>
<snip>

===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris      : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA;   M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email:   [address in tool bar]       : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com       : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best 06
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone 07
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13

      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail