Time: Fri Dec 12 17:43:57 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA19533
	for <pmitch@smtp-local.primenet.com>; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 16:46:05 -0700 (MST)
	by smtp03.primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA10506;
	Fri, 12 Dec 1997 16:42:53 -0700 (MST)
 via SMTP by smtp03.primenet.com, id smtpd010435; Fri Dec 12 16:42:47 1997
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 16:30:02 -0800
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Oath of Office

See 4 U.S.C. 101;  this will guarantee
a "federal question" whenever you challenge
the oath of office for any state employee.

Gilbertson's OPENING BRIEF elaborates the
implications:  failure to take the oath is
ground for ouster via Quo Warranto. 

Confer at "Quo warranto" in Black's and
other legal dictionaries.  Federal questions
are adjudicated in the "district courts"
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331:  be sure to
invoke the District Court of the United States
("DCUS"), pursuant to the "Arising Under"
Clause;  the language is repeated at 1331,
to wit:

  "... Constitution, laws, or treaties
   of the United States."

4 U.S.C. 101 is a law of the United States!

/s/ Paul Mitchell,
Candidate for Congress
http://supremelaw.com


At 05:40 PM 12/12/97 EST, you wrote:
>I know that legislation has been passed by most legislative branches of
>government which make it difficult to recall any elected employee. But how
>about this. The oath of office they took at the swearing in ceremony was a
>contract. In industry, any person failing to fulfill the contract is
summarily
>dismissed. Is there any possibility this could be applied to elected
>employees?
>Shep
>
>

===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris      : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA;   M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email:   [address in tool bar]       : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com       : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best 06
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone 07
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13

      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail