Time: Fri Dec 12 17:43:57 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA19533 for <pmitch@smtp-local.primenet.com>; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 16:46:05 -0700 (MST) by smtp03.primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA10506; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 16:42:53 -0700 (MST) via SMTP by smtp03.primenet.com, id smtpd010435; Fri Dec 12 16:42:47 1997 Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 16:30:02 -0800 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Oath of Office See 4 U.S.C. 101; this will guarantee a "federal question" whenever you challenge the oath of office for any state employee. Gilbertson's OPENING BRIEF elaborates the implications: failure to take the oath is ground for ouster via Quo Warranto. Confer at "Quo warranto" in Black's and other legal dictionaries. Federal questions are adjudicated in the "district courts" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331: be sure to invoke the District Court of the United States ("DCUS"), pursuant to the "Arising Under" Clause; the language is repeated at 1331, to wit: "... Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States." 4 U.S.C. 101 is a law of the United States! /s/ Paul Mitchell, Candidate for Congress http://supremelaw.com At 05:40 PM 12/12/97 EST, you wrote: >I know that legislation has been passed by most legislative branches of >government which make it difficult to recall any elected employee. But how >about this. The oath of office they took at the swearing in ceremony was a >contract. In industry, any person failing to fulfill the contract is summarily >dismissed. Is there any possibility this could be applied to elected >employees? >Shep > > =========================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01 B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02 tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03 email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04 website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05 ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06 Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07 Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08 _____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09 As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10 not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11 ======================================================================== 12 [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail