Time: Fri Dec 12 17:45:26 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA06739
	for <pmitch@smtp-local.primenet.com>; Fri, 12 Dec 1997 17:45:43 -0700 (MST)
	by smtp03.primenet.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA22704;
	Fri, 12 Dec 1997 17:46:03 -0700 (MST)
 via SMTP by smtp03.primenet.com, id smtpd022683; Fri Dec 12 17:45:56 1997
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 17:33:15 -0800
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: TWA Flt. 800 US Navy Drone??? (fwd)

<snip>
>
>      N A V Y   M I S S I L E   D R O N E   D E B R I S
>
>      F O U N D   A T   T W A   C R A S H   S I T E  ?
>
>      (c) 07/28/97 Ian Williams Goddard
>
>      The Southampton Press [1] reports that on May 13th,
>      Long Island resident Dede Muma accidently received
>      a fax from Teledyne Ryan Aeronautical [2] that was
>      intended for the FBI's office in Calverton, Long
>      Island.  The fax indicates that parts of a U.S.
>      Navy missile target drone, a BQM-34 Firebee I [3],
>      may have been found in the wreckage of TWA 800.
>
>      The reason that Muma accidently received the fax,
>      which she passed on to the Southampton Press, was
>      probably because her fax number is 369-4310, while
>      the FBI's number is 369-4301. About the fax, the
>      Southampton Press states:
>
>         Official documents faxed mistakenly to
>         a Riverhead resident...show that the
>         Federal Bureau of Investigation...was
>         investigating whether pieces of debris
>         found among the wreckage of TWA Fight
>         800 were the remnants of an aerial
>         target drone used by the U.S. Navy...
>
>         The fax shows a diagram of what appears
>         to be a missile, along with a breakdown
>         of its tail section and a parts list...
>
>         The object shown in the fax was identified
>         this week by Jane's Information Services
>         in Alexandria, Virginia as a Teledyne
>         Ryan BQM-34 Firebee I, an air or surface-
>         launched recoverable aerial target.
>
>         The targets are used all over the world,
>         including within the military "warning
>         areas" that come as close as about 10
>         nautical miles off Moriches Inlet in the
>         Atlantic Ocean. The Navy practices shoot-
>         ing down drones within the warning areas.
>
>         Ms. Muma said she called the FBI when
>         she received the [Firebee] fax... Ms.
>         Muma was told to "send it along to them,
>         [the FBI] and destroy the original." She
>         said she asked what would happen if she
>         didn't do so, and was told "we'll have
>         to investigate you."
>
>     The source of the fax, Teledyne Ryan Aeronautical
>     of San Diego, CA, manufactures Firebee drones for
>     the Navy. The "Firebee fax" Muma received was sent
>     from Erich Hittinger of Teledyne to FBI agent Ken
>     Maxwell, who was to pass it on to a Teledyne Ryan
>     representative at the FBI's Long Island office,
>     Walt Hamilton.
>
>     Hittinger of Teledyne Ryan told the Southampton
>     Press that the FBI contacted them to ask if orange
>     pieces of debris found at the TWA 800 crash site
>     were from one of their Firebee drones, which are
>     also orange [3]. Hamilton was then flown from San
>     Diego to the FBI's Long Island facility to examine
>     the suspected Firebee debris. According to Hittinger,
>     Hamilton concluded that the orange metal "wasn't
>     from our Firebee," which suggests that it was
>     from someone's Firebee, but not ours.
>
>     Question: If your business depended upon government
>     contracts, would you be inclined to prove that the
>     government, your employer, killed people? It could
>     prove to be a fatal business decision.
>
>
>     WITH NAVY DRONE DEBRIS IN HAND
>
>     In early May 1997, while the FBI had pieces of
>     debris that they suspected came from a U.S. Navy
>     missile-drone, what was the FBI telling us? FBI
>     Director Louis Freeh was telling us it looks like
>     the crash "was a catastrophic mechanical failure."
>     [4] FBI agent James Kallstrom was saying: "We see
>     no evidence of a piece of shrapnel from a missile
>     or a warhead going through the plane." [5]
>
>     On May 12th Newsday [6] reported that with no
>     evidence of a missile or foul play, the FBI was
>     planning to end its investigation by early August.
>     Clearly, as we have already seen with the cover-
>     up of the explosives residue [7], there is no
>     correlation between the FBI's public-relations
>     front and the true story behind the scenes.
>
>     Rather than telling the truth that they suspected
>     a Navy missile-drone was involved,  the FBI was
>     pushing "mechanical failure" while simultaneously
>     intimidating Dede Muma with threats of an invest-
>     igation against her for refusing to destroy her
>     errantly acquired evidence of U.S. Navy culp-
>     ability in the downing of TWA Flight 800.
>
>
>     HEAVY MILITARY AIRTRAFFIC
>
>     The skies off the Long Island shore on July 17,
>     1996 were filled with aircraft. Not only were
>     several Air National Guard aircraft in the air,
>     and not only was a high-speed vehicle heading
>     toward TWA 800 as reported by eyewitnesses,
>     radar, and a satellite, but a U.S. Navy P-3
>     Orion was flying almost directly above TWA
>     800 when the accident occurred.
>
>     Furthermore, several mysterious small aircraft
>     fitting the profile of target drones were also
>     seen in the area. Not only did Linda Kabot photo-
>     graph what seems to be a drone missile [8], but
>     the Long Island newspaper The Independent [9]
>     reported that witnesses saw a "smaller plane"
>     flying near TWA 800 at crash time. Indeed, a
>     Firebee drone looks like a "smaller plane."[3]
>
>     Even more, as I watched CNN on the night of the
>     crash, a pilot was interviewed who said he saw
>     what looked like a "stunt plane" crash into TWA
>     800. A Firebee looks like a "stunt plane," and
>     alas, it seems that they may have found parts
>     of this "stunt plane" in TWA 800.
>
>     Yet more, the Boston Globe [10] reported that in
>     addition to seeing "a brilliant flare-like glow
>     that streaked toward the plane," witnesses also
>     saw "a low-flying aircraft without lights cruising
>     off shore." Could that aircraft without lights
>     have been one of the aerial target drones, perhaps
>     Firebees, launched from Wallops Island on July
>     17th? [11] Drones can fly for hundreds of miles.
>
>     That there was such heavy military air-traffic
>     on July 17 should not be a big surprise because
>     there was a massive offshore military war-game
>     called "Global Yankee '96" [12] underway at the
>     time. Virtually all the military assets in the
>     air around TWA 800 that evening, including the
>     Air National Guard aircraft, where scheduled
>     to be involved in "Global Yankee '96." [13]
>
>
>     With such heavy military air-traffic and wargames
>     in the area around TWA 800, which was on the "Betty
>     track" (a safe route around active naval exercise
>     zones), is it a surprise that over 150 witnesses
>     saw TWA 800 being hit by a missile-like projectile?
>     Is it a surprise that parts of a Navy missile-drone
>     may have been found among the debris of TWA 800?
>     I would dare to say that it is not a surprise.
>
>
>*******************************************************************
>Visit  Ian Williams Goddard  ------>  http://www.erols.com/igoddard
>___________________________________________________________________
>
>___________________________________________________________________
>[1] THE SOUTHAMPTON PRESS: Fax Gives Glimpse of Crash
>    Investigation. By W. Michael Pitcher, July 24, 1997.
>    URL: http://www.shpress.com/news/STORY03.htm
>[2] Teledyne Ryan Aeronautical: http://www.tdyryan.com
>    BQM-145A: http://www.tdyryan.com/M350/default.htm
>    Kabot missile? http://www.tdyryan.com/MALD/default.htm
>    Explosives: http://www.tdyryan.com/Ordnance/ordnance.htm
>[3] BQM-34F Firebee Drone:
>    http://www.webexpert.net/rosedale/twacasefile/firebee.html
>[4] "Meet the Press." NBC television program, May 4, 1997.
>[5] REUTERS: FBI: Mechanical Fault Likely Caused TWA Crash
>    Monday May 5 7:00 AM EDT.
>    http://www.yahoo.com/headlines/special/twa/twa.186.html
>[6] NEWSDAY: Investigative Shift. By Lauren Terrazzano,
>    May 12, 1997. http://www.newsday.com/jet/cras0512.htm
>[7] URL: http://www.erols.com/igoddard/coverup.htm
>[8] URL: http://www.erols.com/igoddard/kab-dir.htm
>[9] THE INDEPENDENT: TWA Flight 800, Hundreds Witness
>    Explosion. By Kari-Lisa Brangan, July 24, 1996.
>    URL: http://www.peconic.net/independent/07249604.htm
>[10] THE BOSTON GLOBE: U.S. Agents Hear of Flash Before
>     Plane Exploded. By Pamela Ferdinand, July 24, 1996, A18.
>[11] The NASA facility at Wallops Island, VA, is used by
>     the DoD to launch target drones for the Navy. Keith Kohler
>     (keith.kohler@gsfc.nasa.gov), Wallops Island representative
>     told TWA 800 researcher Michael Davias (cintos@snet.net)
>     that several aerial target drones were launched on July
>     17, 1996. Message-ID: (328FB000.2E0D@snet.net)
>[12] http://www.webexpert.net/rosedale/twacasefile/yankee.html
>[13] http://www.webexpert.net/rosedale/twacasefile/newsfour.html
>
>     Visit these pages and copy their contents:
>     http://www.ang.af.mil/angrc-xo/xoom/aargy96.htm
>     http://www.ang.af.mil/angrc-xo/glbynk/partcpnt.htm
>     http://www.rl.af.mil/Lab/C3/current-events/gy_rap1.jpg
>
>
>
>*******************************************************************
>Visit  Ian Williams Goddard  ------>  http://www.erols.com/igoddard
>___________________________________________________________________
>
<snip>

===========================================================================
Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris      : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
B.A.: Political Science, UCLA;   M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
tel:     (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
email:   [address in tool bar]       : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
website: http://supremelaw.com       : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best 06
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone 07
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this 08
_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice.  We shall 10
not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
======================================================================== 12
[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13

      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail