Time: Tue Dec 02 16:18:24 1997
To: Jay Robbins <han-wi@ri.ultranet.com>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Any Thoughts?
Cc:
Bcc:
References: <3.0.3.16.19971202160659.332fc310@pop.primenet.com> <3.0.3.16.19971202175159.36b73d6c@pop.ri.ultranet.com>
All voter registration forms are fraudulent
for requiring that registrants declare,
under penalty of perjury, that they are
federal citizens. This is fully developed
in Gilbertson's OPENING BRIEF, now loaded
in the Supreme Law Library at the URL
just below my name here. Becraft will
deny it, but his own state supreme court
ruled in 1909 that there are two (2)
classes of citizenship, and you can be
in one class, and not the other!!
/s/ Paul Mitchell,
Candidate for Congress
http://supremelaw.com
At 06:08 PM 12/2/97, you wrote:
>Paul,
>Already on that one....anything else you can point me to? Thanx!
> Jay
>
>
>At 04:06 PM 12/2/97 -0800, you wrote:
>> Disclosure of social security number. Act Dec. 31, 1974,
>> P.L. 93-579, Section 7, 88 Stat. 1909, provided:
>>
>> "(a)(1) It shall be unlawful for any Federal, State or
>> local government agency to deny to any individual any right,
>> benefit, or privilege provided by law because of such
>> individual's refusal to disclose his social security account
>> number.
>>
>> "(2) the provisions of paragraph (1) of this subsection
>> shall not apply with respect to --
>>
>> "(A) any disclosure which is required by Federal
>> statute, or
>>
>> "(B) the disclosure of a social security number to any
>> Federal, State, or local agency maintaining a
>> system of records in existence and operating
>> before January 1, 1975, if such disclosure was
>> required under statute or regulation adopted prior
>> to such date to verify the identity of an
>> individual.
>>
>> "(b) Any Federal, State, or local government agency which
>> requests an individual to disclose his social security
>> account number shall inform that individual whether that
>> disclosure is mandatory or voluntary, by what statutory or
>> other authority such number is solicited, and what uses will
>> be made of it."
>>
>>
>>Comments by Paul Mitchell follow:
>>
>>Congress deliberately failed to codify this statute in Title 5 of
>>the United States Code. You will find it embedded at the end of
>>the historical notes within the Privacy Act. When a government
>>employee was sued for violating this Act, he asserted ignorance
>>of the law as his defense. The court upheld this defense, thus
>>creating an important exception to the general rule that
>>ignorance of the law is no excuse. My reading of this decision
>>is that the court was giving silent judicial notice to the fact
>>that Congress actually "hid" the law; thus, the court's holding
>>did not really overturn the maxim (ignorance is not excuse); it
>>merely recognized that fraud vitiates everything, even the most
>>solemn promises. I have taken this statute and reduced it down
>>to the size of a standard credit card. Then, I laminated it in
>>plastic and saved it in my wallet. Later, I gave it away to an
>>attendee of one of Lynne Meredith's seminars; the attendee was
>>mostly incredulous that such a law even existed. It is very easy
>>to make another one. I prefer to take a photocopy right out of
>>the law books, and to laminate that photocopy. Try it! It is
>>always very powerful to witness these laws yourself, at the local
>>county law library. Take this email message down to the
>>reference librarian, and see if s/he can locate it for you. The
>>Privacy Act can be found in the reference volume which lists
>>statutes by name. Good luck!
>>
>>Paul Andrew Mitchell
>>November, 1996
>>all rights reserved
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>At 05:51 PM 12/2/97, you wrote:
>>>Dear Jay,
>>> This is another one of those urgent matters I need info on right away.
>>> I
>>>have a program coming up Wednesday with Larry Becraft and one of the topics
>>>will
>>>cover is one I just heard about last night and that is how the State of
>>>Connecticut is mandating that the Registrar of Voters in each town submit
>>>copies
>>>of voter registration forms with Social Security numbers to the state and
>to
>>>give copies to a PRIVATE agency that compilies jury lists. Some towns have
>>>refused the requests while others have blindly granted it. I am about to
>>find
>>>out if my town, the town of Windham had granted those requests.
>>> Larry will be able to tell me what I need to know but I am hoping to
>>>get a
>>>head start on this because I am afraid time is against Connecticut
>>>residents who
>>>gave SSNs on voter registration cards. Fortunately I never supplied one so
>>>personally I have nothing to worry about. I want to know how illegal it is
>>>for
>>>them to do it. I looked under 5 UCS Sec. 552a but my finding is that this
>>>does
>>>not relate to state or local agencies. Can you help? I want to get some
>>>ammo
>>>ready to present to the registrar of voters as well as the First
>Selectman.
>>>Thanks!!!
>>> Jay Robbins
>>> 4 Your Information
>>> PO Box 672
>>> Woonsocket, RI 02895
>>> Email: han-wi@ri.ultranet.com
>>> Voicemail:1-800-947-1902
>>> Website: http://www.ultranet.com/~han-wi
>>> IRS: We've got what it takes, to take what you've got.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>===========================================================================
>>Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01
>>B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02
>>tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03
>>email: [address in tool bar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04
>>website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05
>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06
>> Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07
>> Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08
>>_____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09
>>As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10
>>not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11
>>======================================================================== 12
>>[This text formatted on-screen in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] 13
>>
>>
> Jay Robbins
> 4 Your Information
> PO Box 672
> Woonsocket, RI 02895
> Email: han-wi@ri.ultranet.com
> Voicemail:1-800-947-1902
> Website: http://www.ultranet.com/~han-wi
> IRS: We've got what it takes, to take what you've got.
>
>
>
>
>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail