Time: Wed Dec 10 19:33:22 1997 To: From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLF: IRS is an extortion racket Cc: Bcc: linda@tidalwave.net References: [This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris Citizen of Arizona state, Federal Witness, and Vice President for Legal Affairs c/o General Delivery at: 2509 North Campbell, #1776 Tucson, Arizona state In Propria Persona All Rights Reserved without prejudice UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA In Re: ) Case No. #93-06051-PHX-GBN ) New Life Health Center Company, ) 7th SUPPLEMENT TO APPLICATION Debtor ) FOR INTERVENTION OF RIGHT, FOR ) RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY ) AND DEMAND FOR MANDATORY ) JUDICIAL NOTICE: ________________________________) ) Rule 201(d), Federal Rules Paul Andrew Mitchell, ) of Evidence; Rule 4001, ) Local Bankruptcy Rule; Movant, ) Full Faith and Credit Clause ) v. ) ) New Life Health Center Company ) et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ________________________________) COMES NOW Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, Citizen of Arizona state, expressly not a citizen of the United States ("federal citizen"), Federal Witness, Private Attorney General, and Candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives (hereinafter "Movant"), to provide formal Notice to all interested party(s), and to demand mandatory judicial notice by this honorable Court, pursuant to Rule 201(d) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, of Movant's arguments, as made herein, why this Court should deny confirmation of Debtor's First Amended Plan of Reorganization. Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay: Page 1 of 17 FRAUD UPON THE COURT AND UPON MOVANT Fraud has been perpetrated upon this honorable Court, by virtue of misrepresentations by Mr. Robert A. Johnson, Esquire ("Mr. Johnson"), to wit: Mr. Johnson does not have a valid oath of office. See attached Exhibits "A", "B", and "C", which are attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein. Mr. Johnson does not enjoy any lawful power(s) of attorney to represent the "Internal Revenue Service" [sic]. Mr. Johnson has fallen totally silent in the face of two (2) affidavits which implicate Mr. Johnson in barratry, fraud, extortion, and criminal conspiracy against Debtor. Said affidavits have now become the truth of the case, for all time. See exhibits attached. Moreover, the "Internal Revenue Service" is not an organization within the United States Department of the Treasury. It has never been authorized by Act of Congress to exist as such. The "Internal Revenue Service" is actually an extortion racket operating as Trust #62, which is domiciled in Puerto Rico -- a federal "State" -- under color of the Federal Alcohol Administration ("FAA"), but the FAA was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States in the year 1935. DEPRIVATION OF DUE PROCESS This court has inflicted a financial hardship upon Movant by abusing discretion and depriving Movant of Movant's fundamental Right to due process of law, by failing timely to rule upon Movant's APPLICATION FOR INTERVENTION OF RIGHT, RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY, AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENTS. Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay: Page 2 of 17 Movant has thus been arbitrarily and capriciously deprived of an opportunity to intervene in the instant case so as to defend the Debtor against certain, specific criminal conduct being perpetrated upon Debtor by officers, co-workers and agents of the Debtor. Movant has gone to great lengths to document said criminal conduct -- by means of pleadings including, but not limited to, Movant's VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS previously filed and properly served upon all interested party(s). The several officers and alleged agents of this Court are thus implicated in fraud upon Movant, and also in depriving, and in conspiring to deprive, Movant of fundamental Rights guaranteed to Movant by the Constitution for the United States of America, as lawfully amended, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 and 242. See Exhibit "D", also incorporated herein by reference. VERIFICATION I, Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby verify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the "United States" (federal government), that the above statement of fact is true and correct, according to the best of My current information, knowledge, and belief, so help Me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1). Dated: December 10, 1997 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Paul Mitchell Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Citizen of Arizona state, Federal Witness (expressly not a citizen of the United States) All Rights Reserved without prejudice Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay: Page 3 of 17 PROOF OF SERVICE I, Paul Andrew, Mitchell, Sui Juris, hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the "United States" (federal government), that I am at least 18 years of age, a Citizen of one of the United States of America, and that I personally served the following document(s): 7th SUPPLEMENT TO APPLICATION FOR INTERVENTION OF RIGHT, FOR RELIEF FROM THE AUTOMATIC STAY AND DEMAND FOR MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE: Rule 201(d), Federal Rules of Evidence; Rule 4001, Local Bankruptcy Rule; Full Faith and Credit Clause by placing one true and correct copy of said document(s) in first class U.S. Mail, with postage prepaid and properly addressed to: Christopher H. Bayley United States Trustees Todd V. Jones c/o P.O. Box 36170 c/o 400 E. Van Buren Phoenix 85067-6170/tdc One Arizona Center ARIZONA STATE Phoenix 85004-0001/tdc ARIZONA STATE Cathy Holt Robert A. Johnson, Esquire Lewis and Roca "Internal Revenue Service" [sic] c/o 40 N. Central Ave. c/o 3225 N. Central, #1500 Phoenix 85004/tdc Phoenix 85012-2469/tdc ARIZONA STATE ARIZONA STATE Brian Feldman, Esquire Department of Justice Civil Trial Section -- Western Region c/o P.O. Box 683, Ben Franklin Station Washington 20044-0683/tdc DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA [See USPS Publication #221 for addressing instructions.] Executed on December 10, 1997: /s/ Paul Mitchell Paul Andrew, Mitchell, Sui Juris Citizen of Arizona state, Federal Witness (expressly not a citizen of the United States) All Rights Reserved without Prejudice Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay: Page 4 of 17 Exhibit "A": CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND DEMAND TO: Mr. Robert A. Johnson FROM: Mr. Paul Andrew Mitchell DATE: May 27, 1996 Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay: Page 5 of 17 Certified U.S. Mail c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 Serial Number #P-899-777-085 Tucson, Arizona state Return Receipt Requested zip code exempt Restricted Delivery Requested May 27, 1996 CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND DEMAND Mr. Robert A. Johnson 3225 North Central Avenue, Suite 1500 Phoenix, Arizona state zip code exempt Dear Mr. Johnson: This is to inform you that you have been implicated in barratry and criminal conspiracy because of verified statements of fact which have been made in EXHIBIT "D" attached to the AFFIDAVIT OF CAUSES AND OBJECTIONS TO O.S.C. which I executed and filed on behalf on the Company In re: Grand Jury Subpoena Served on New Life Health Center Company, U.S. District Court Case No. GJ-95-1- 6, Tucson, Arizona. You will have at most thirty (30) calendar days, as of the above date, to file any verified affidavit(s) of rebuttal to this EXHIBIT "D", a copy of which is attached hereto for your convenience. Under applicable rules of the Common Law, which have been formally invoked in this case, your failure to rebut said EXHIBIT will render it conclusive fact and the truth of the case for all time. Silence creates estoppel by acquiescence. Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading. ... We cannot condone this shocking conduct by the IRS. Our revenue system is based upon the good faith of the taxpayers and the taxpayers should be able to expect the same from government in its enforcement and collection activities.... This sort of deception will not be tolerated and if this is the "routine" it should be corrected immediately. [U. S. vs Tweel, 550 F.2d 297, 299 (1977)] [quoting U.S. vs Prudden, 424 F.2d 1021, 1032 (1970)] [emphasis added] Silence is a species of conduct, and constitutes an implied representation of the existence of the state of facts in question, and the estoppel is accordingly a species of estoppel by misrepresentation. [cite omitted] When silence is of such a character and under such circumstances that it would become a fraud upon the other party to permit the party who has kept silent to deny what his silence has induced the other to believe and act upon, it will operate as an estoppel. [Carmine vs Bowen, 64 A. 932 (1906), emphasis added] Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay: Page 6 of 17 Please be advised that the Company and its officers and co- workers have explicitly reserved their right to have a jury of peers resolve controversies of fact and law in this case. Thank you very much in advance for your cooperation. The clock is now running. Sincerely yours, /s/ Paul Mitchell Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Citizen of Arizona state (520) 323-3921 phone/VM (520) 323-3922 fax/24-hour email: pmitch@primenet.com copies: Judge John M. Roll, U.S. District Court, Tucson Judge Alex Kozinski, Ninth Circuit, Pasadena Judge George Nielsen, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Phoenix Albert M. Rau, Chapter 13 Trustee, Phoenix James J. Everett, Counsel for Debtors, Phoenix # # # Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay: Page 7 of 17 Exhibit "B": CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND DEMAND TO: Mr. Robert A. Johnson FROM: Mr. Paul Andrew Mitchell DATE: June 15, 1996 Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay: Page 8 of 17 Certified U.S. Mail c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 Serial Number #P-476-653-250 Tucson, Arizona state Return Receipt Requested zip code exempt Restricted Delivery Requested June 15, 1996 CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE AND DEMAND Mr. Robert A. Johnson 3225 North Central Avenue, Suite 1500 Phoenix, Arizona state zip code exempt Dear Mr. Johnson: This is to inform you that you have been implicated in barratry, fraud, extortion, and criminal conspiracy because of verified statements of fact which have been made in the JOINT AFFIDAVIT OF DR. AND MRS. EUGENE BURNS AND DR. AND MRS. SHELDON DEAL, which was executed and filed on behalf on the Company In re: Grand Jury Subpoena Served on New Life Health Center Company, U.S. District Court Case No. GJ-95-1-6, Tucson, Arizona. You will have at most thirty (30) calendar days, as of the above date, to file any verified affidavit(s) of rebuttal to this AFFIDAVIT, a copy of which is attached hereto for your convenience. Under applicable rules of the Common Law, which have been formally invoked in this case, your failure to rebut said AFFIDAVIT will render it conclusive fact and the truth of the case for all time. Silence creates estoppel by acquiescence. Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading. ... We cannot condone this shocking conduct by the IRS. Our revenue system is based upon the good faith of the taxpayers and the taxpayers should be able to expect the same from government in its enforcement and collection activities.... This sort of deception will not be tolerated and if this is the "routine" it should be corrected immediately. [U. S. vs Tweel, 550 F.2d 297, 299 (1977)] [quoting U.S. vs Prudden, 424 F.2d 1021, 1032 (1970)] [emphasis added] Silence is a species of conduct, and constitutes an implied representation of the existence of the state of facts in question, and the estoppel is accordingly a species of estoppel by misrepresentation. [cite omitted] When silence is of such a character and under such circumstances that it would become a fraud upon the other party to permit the party who has kept silent to deny what his silence has induced the other to believe and act upon, it will operate as an estoppel. [Carmine vs Bowen, 64 A. 932 (1906), emphasis added] Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay: Page 9 of 17 Please be advised that the Company and its officers and co- workers have explicitly reserved their right to have a jury of peers resolve controversies of fact and law in this case. Thank you very much in advance for your cooperation. The clock is now running. Sincerely yours, /s/ Paul Mitchell Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Citizen of Arizona state (520) 323-3921 phone/VM (520) 323-3922 fax/24-hour email: pmitch@primenet.com copies: Judge John M. Roll, U.S. District Court, Tucson Judge Alex Kozinski, Ninth Circuit, Pasadena Judge George Nielsen, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Phoenix Albert M. Rau, Chapter 13 Trustee, Phoenix James J. Everett, former Counsel for Debtors, Phoenix # # # Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay: Page 10 of 17 Exhibit "C": AFFIDAVIT OF DEFAULT TO: Mr. Robert A. Johnson FROM: Mr. Paul Andrew Mitchell DATE: August 5, 1996 Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay: Page 11 of 17 Certified U.S. Mail c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 Serial Number #P-332-390-902 Tucson, Arizona state Return Receipt Requested zip code exempt Restricted Delivery Requested August 5, 1996 AFFIDAVIT OF DEFAULT Mr. Robert A. Johnson 3225 North Central Avenue, Suite 1500 Phoenix, Arizona state zip code exempt Dear Mr. Johnson: This is my AFFIDAVIT OF DEFAULT affirming, under penalty of perjury, that by your total silence you have defaulted in the face of my two (2) CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICES AND DEMANDS dated May 27, 1996, and June 15, 1996, respectively, copies of which are attached for your information and recollection. In said NOTICES AND DEMANDS, you were advised that your silence in the face of the attached AFFIDAVITS would render them conclusive fact and the truth of the case for all time, and that your silence would invoke estoppel by acquiescence. To repeat, you have completely failed to answer or otherwise rebut, either verbally or in writing, any of the statements which have been made in the above mentioned AFFIDAVITS. VERIFICATION I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the "United States," that the above statement of fact is true and correct, to the best of my current knowledge, information, and belief, that it is materially complete and not misleading, so help Me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1). Executed on August 5, 1996. /s/ Paul Mitchell Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Citizen of Arizona state and federal witness attachments copy: Federal Bureau of Investigation Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay: Page 12 of 17 Exhibit "D": PRESS RELEASE: "Paul Mitchell Wins Civil Verdict against Accountant for Embezzling $3,000" November 12, 1997 Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay: Page 13 of 17 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE November 12, 1997 Paul Mitchell Wins Civil Verdict against Accountant for Embezzling $3,000 Tucson, Arizona. Paul Andrew Mitchell, Counselor at Law, federal witness, and founder of the Supreme Law Firm and Supreme Law School, was awarded more than $3,000 in actual damages today from a jury of 8 who agreed that Neil and Evelyn Nordbrock had embezzled funds entrusted to their care and management. Mitchell was invited by the Nordbrocks to change plans and move to Tucson in late February of 1996, when they met at a conference on common law in Albuquerque, New Mexico. A scheduled speaker failed to show, and Mitchell was asked to address a full audience instead. The Nordbrocks were so moved by Mitchell's lecture, they offered him an office in Tucson, Arizona, to continue his research there. That office was a single room, without windows, in the administrative headquarters of the New Life Health Center. Soon after arriving in Tucson, Mitchell was invited to lecture at the Elizabeth Broderick Seminars in Palmdale, California, where Broderick claimed to have perfected huge commercial liens against government agencies like the County of Orange, California. Broderick even took credit for precipitating the largest municipal bankruptcy in the history of America, when the County of Orange floundered under Treasurer Robert Citron's failed financial management of overly leveraged derivatives. Broderick then issued phony bank checks against these bogus liens to all attendees of her biweekly seminars. An estimated 5,000 people received her warrants at these seminars. Broderick's checks were collected at FBI headquarters in Los Angeles, California. From there, the checks were handed to a property forfeiture team, with headquarters in the Department of Justice. Mitchell has recently filed a formal OFFER TO PROVE RACKETEERING in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, alleging that DOJ aided and abetted Broderick's racket, by using the phony checks to entrap Broderick's naive seminar attendees. Broderick has since been convicted of 26 counts of bank fraud and mail fraud. All her co-defendants were likewise convicted. While Mitchell was beginning to build an early foundation for Broderick's defense, his efforts were quickly scuttled when the Colton office rented by Adolf Hoch, a Broderick associate, was gutted of all computer and related equipment, leaving only the carpets and empty desks. At the same time, Mitchell was loaned a car with tampered front brakes. A Colton auto mechanic invited him to inspect the car, while it was on the rack and the brake assembly was at eye level. Adolf Hoch was asked to pay for the repairs, but he complained that the mechanic was gouging him. At that time, Hoch was driving a new Buick Riviera worth $35,000, and the estimated brake repairs cost less than $500. A related case was also heating up while Mitchell was in Colton, attempting to assemble a major defense strategy for Broderick and her co-defendants. The New Life Health Center in Tucson, Arizona, was served with a grand jury subpoena for all business records. The general manager of New Life, Eugene A. Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay: Page 14 of 17 Burns, had used several Broderick warrants, "flushing New Life with much needed cash," as Adolf Hoch had confided to Mitchell, on one of several trips from Broderick's San Bernardino office to the Essex Hotel in Palmdale, California. En route to Palmdale, Hoch was speeding at 90 mph, and nearly missed a small car as it crossed the highway, failing to anticipate the high speed of Hoch's new Buick in the dark desert. Hoch made a habit of holding the wheel with one hand and a cell phone in the other, while weaving recklessly through rush hour traffic. Mitchell returned to Tucson and turned his attention to an aggressive attack on the grand jury subpoena, and on the Internal Revenue Service which had initiated DOJ's attempt to obtain New Life's records. With strong encouragement from Neil Nordbrock, Mitchell conceived a powerful defense which was recently published in the Supreme Law Library, an Internet-based archive of all key cases Mitchell has litigated as a Counselor at Law. That library is available at Internet URL http://supremelaw.com. To facilitate court appearances, Mitchell was appointed to the office of New Life's Vice President for Legal Affairs, at the recommendation of New Life's accountant, Neil Nordbrock, and that appointment was recognized, and placed into evidence, by United States District Judge John M. Roll in Tucson. With this authority, Mitchell wrote a flurry of 25 pleadings which overwhelmed the federal judge and sent the IRS and DOJ running for cover. One of those pleadings exposed, for the first time, what Mitchell now calls "The Kick-Back Racket," a defunct federal program called Performance Management and Recognition System, which awards illegal cash payments to prosecutors and judges, for getting indictments from grand juries against tax protestors. Mitchell all but proved that a perjury racket was, and still is, rampant within the DOJ. On a motion by the corrupt prosecutor, Robert L. Miskell, the federal judge then struck all of Mitchell's 25 pleadings, after obstructing their delivery by the U.S. Postal Service to the federal grand jury convened in that case. Mitchell even used Registered U.S. Mail, but the return receipts were signed by Judge Roll's secretary, instead of the grand jury foreperson. During the course of studying New Life's records, Mitchell also discovered that his appointment to the office of Vice President had been faked by a rubber stamp trustee. In a very confidential memo to Neil Nordbrock, long-time accountant for New Life, Mitchell predicted that a fictitious trustee would cause enormous legal problems for New Life, if it was not corrected immediately. Nordbrock never answered Mitchell's memo on this subject, and observed passively as Eugene A. Burns, a former racketball champion, fell into a full blown panic when the FBI put pressure on Burns to jettison Mitchell from the case. Mitchell was abruptly terminated from New Life one month after Nordbrock received this confidential memo. Mitchell concluded from this that Nordbrock had conceived and/or maintained the fictitious trustee, from the beginning. The Pima County Justice Court, in which Mitchell sued Nordbrock, refused to allow this confidential memorandum into evidence, in addition to four full boxes of other documents. The judge in that case, Walter U. Weber, also decided to disallow Mitchell's claim that the Nordbrocks had breached a contract for Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay: Page 15 of 17 legal services Mitchell performed for them after his wrongful termination from New Life. Weber ruled that Mitchell had practiced law by providing legal services to the Nordbrocks. Mitchell plans to appeal that portion of the case, to make precedent based in part on the original 13th Amendment, and the Contract Clause in the U.S. Constitution. Mitchell also maneuvered Weber into a bona fide controversy over the provisions invoked by Weber's oath of office to support that Constitution. Neil Nordbrock had retained Mitchell to commence a quiet title action against the IRS, but Mitchell referred that case to Vern Holland in Tulsa, Oklahoma, a recognized quiet title expert, after Mitchell was invited to defend the Montana Freeman on location in Billings, Montana. Mitchell highly recommended Holland to the Nordbrocks, who did retain Holland to prepare the initial complaint to quiet title to a business office once owned by the Nordbrocks, but now forfeited to the IRS for unpaid federal income taxes. Neil Nordbrock had tendered a bogus Montana Freeman warrant to the IRS for the sum of $398,000, during the month before the Albuquerque conference. Upon returning from Montana, Mitchell learned that the Nordbrocks were about to switch attorneys once again, and retain a local Tucson bar member, after complaining bitterly and often to Mitchell about the bar monopoly practices. The Nordbrocks then paid the new attorney's retainer with money they embezzled from Mitchell. That $3,000 was all the money which Mitchell had in the world, at that point in time, and the embezzlement put enormous pressure on Mitchell just to survive. A private mediator even had to loan Mitchell money, just to buy food. Other generous Americans have quietly helped Mitchell climb out of the deep hole caused by DOJ's outright economic retaliation. Neil Nordbrock has already been convicted on two felony counts of falsifying federal income tax returns, and a lifetime injunction prevents him from preparing tax returns. Evelyn Nordbrock, his wife, makes a living doing tax returns for Neil's former clients, despite their low opinion of the IRS. Clearly, they have mixed feelings about Mitchell's admitted plans, and highly successful efforts thus far, to dismantle the IRS. Evelyn Nordbrock will need to find other work, if Mitchell succeeds. Mitchell also plans to sue Eugene A. Burns for wrongful termination, and a host of other claims arising from his practice of refusing Mitchell's frequent legal mail, and defaming Mitchell with obnoxious insults on the outside of refused envelopes. Under pressure from Mitchell to subpoena Eugene A. Burns for additional testimony, however, Walter U. Weber explained that Burns was no longer available. Why, he did not say. Weber had also threatened Mitchell with prison and hard labor, during the first day of trial, because of all the sensitive issues raised by Mitchell's voluminous pleadings. Mitchell types 140 words per minute, and shares huge quantities of email on the Internet. A motion to change judge was denied. Mitchell has filed a criminal complaint against Weber anyway, because Mitchell is a recognized federal witness under 18 U.S.C. 1513, the federal law which prohibits retaliating against any federal witness. The penalties for violating this criminal statute are quite severe. Mitchell is now awaiting a ruling from a federal bankruptcy court in Phoenix, Arizona, to lift the automatic stay on Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay: Page 16 of 17 litigation against Burns and his company, and to issue a declaratory judgment on the validity of Mitchell's appointment to the office of Vice President for Legal Affairs. Mitchell's research has already uncovered numerous irregularities in the original bankruptcy petitions by Burns and New Life, including false appraisals of 4 rare South American macaw birds which Burns regards as his special pets. Magoo and the other macaws accompany Burns to and from work every day, and daily screech at high decibels, while people are trying to work, and talk on the telephone, in the same office space. Burns paid Mitchell $100 per week initially, upping that to $500 per week during the height of the grand jury litigation, but stiffed Mitchell for over $2,000 in back pay, when Mitchell discovered that "Sheryl Smith" is a fictitious trustee. Burns routinely paid New Life's former attorney, James J. Everett, at a rate of $175 per hour, before Everett upped that rate to $200 per hour. Burns is now reported to have sued Everett for fraudulent invoices; this report remains unconfirmed. Seventh Supplement to Intervention/Relief from Stay: Page 17 of 17 # # # =========================================================================== Paul Andrew Mitchell, Sui Juris : Counselor at Law, federal witness 01 B.A.: Political Science, UCLA; M.S.: Public Administration, U.C.Irvine 02 tel: (520) 320-1514: machine; fax: (520) 320-1256: 24-hour/day-night 03 email: [address in toolbar] : using Eudora Pro 3.0.3 on 586 CPU 04 website: http://supremelaw.com : visit the Supreme Law Library now 05 ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best 06 Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone 07 Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this 08 _____________________________________: Law is authority in written words 09 As agents of the Most High, we came here to establish justice. We shall 10 not leave, until our mission is accomplished and justice reigns eternal. 11 ======================================================================== 12 [This text formatted on-screen in Courier 10, non-proportional spacing.] 13
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail