Time: Mon Dec 15 13:41:11 1997
To: Ed <watchman@pacifier.com>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: wrong argument
Bcc: sls

The "emergency" is bogus, and you know it.

/s/ Paul Mitchell,
Candidate for Congress

At 12:11 PM 12/15/97 -0800, you wrote:
>>Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 12:06:46 -0800
>>It appears to me that although everyone has this legal knowledge showing
>>that there is no way the IRS has any Jurisdiction over the People, and
>that it is voluntary; i must add.... it is voluntary, and that most are
>>None of the Arguements disputed by Mr. Becraft entailed a venue arguement
>over the military jurisdiction of the commander in chief. The IRS is
>enforcing corporate statute over the people only when they engage in the
>venue designated by the commander in chief under the current State of
>Emergency. Do not believe for a minute, that i have not noticed the lack of
>mention of this vital aspect, by the "most knowledgeable patriot attorney
>in the country".
>>>>If this whole thing didn't pertain solely to corporations, then why was
>>>>the correcting amendment signed by the CORPORATE unit ???
>>>> Now from the above who is the "resident" in 1.1-1?  Is the United
>States "at home?"  Is a "resident" having a PERMANENT address located "at
>home" in Title 26 USC 7701a (39) if he can't be found "abroad" as stated in
>Subdivision 1 of the 1913 Income Statute on page 166?  Doesn't that apply
>only to federal workers who are in a trade or business as noted in 26 USC
>162?  Do not these employees operate "abroad" in the foreign States as
>representatives of Congress and not the people? 
>>This is where the story jumps the track. What and when and where, anything
>occured in the 1800's 
>>as a building block, does not explain the Venue of the Jurisdiction of the
>current democratic
>>United States, which is bankrupt and acting under treaty requirements of
>the International Monetary Fund, and World Bank. 22 USC 286
>>It is the Home Address and Voluntary Acts, of a Resident, that makes them
>a resident in the first place. One must Identify the Venue, of the
>Jurisdiction, and it is contained below:
>>NATIONAL EMERGENCY: (as defined in Black's Law Dictionary) A state of
>national crisis; a situation demanding immediate and extraordinary national
>or federal action. Congress has made little or no distinction between a
>"state of national emergency" and a "state of war". Brown v. Bernstein,
>D.C.Pa., 49 F.Supp. 728, 732.
>>In 1973, in Senate Report 93-549, the first sentence reads: 
>>"Since March the 9th, 1933, the United States has been in a state of
>declared national emergency."
>>"This vast range of powers, taken together, confer enough authority to
>rule the country without reference to normal constitutional processes.
>Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize
>property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities;
>assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all
>transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private
>enterprise; restrict travel; and, in a plethora of particular ways, control
>the lives of all American citizens"
>>so the only argument, is that you do not fall within its grasp! otherwise
>it is martial law, and that is why the constituional arguement is vague.
>Not because it is incorrect, rather it is misapplied, and applied to late
>in the situation.
>>The only original constitutional question in the authority of the United
>States, is the Venue of its Authority, and going off to the subject matter
>of the Jurisdiction invalidates the previous arguement, in the eyes of the
>>Who uses a commercial admiralty courtroom to preside over all matters of
>Individual, corporate, civil, and constitutional legal matters. It is the
>silence about the Venue, and court procedures, where rather than inform and
>protect the public the Judge gets a quick word for his proof of Venue, and
>the authority of that Military flag hanging there by order of the Commander
>in Chief of the United States, is enforced. And the Elite Patriot espouses
>his Constitutional Rights,
>>God Granted... which do not apply to Caesars kingdom, for Caesar thinks He
>is god.
>>12 USC Section 95(b)  reads:
>>"The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations
>heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the
>President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March
>the 4th, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by Subsection (b) of
>Section 5 of the Act of October 6th, 1917, as amended [12 USCS Sec. 95a],
>are hereby approved and confirmed. (Mar. 9, 1933, c. 1, Title I, Sec. 1, 48
>Stat. 1.)". 
>>Wherein Roosevelt wrote:
>>"I am prepared under my constitutional duty to recommend the measures that
>a stricken nation in the midst of a stricken world may require. These
>measures, or such other measures as the Congress may build out of its
>experience and wisdom, I shall seek, within my constitutional authority, to
>bring to speedy adoption. But in the event that the Congress shall fail to
>take one of these two courses, and in the event that the national emergency
>is still critical, I shall not evade the clear course of duty that will
>then confront me. I shall ask the Congress for the one remaining instrument
>to meet the crisis broad Executive power to wage a war against the
>emergency, as great as the power that would be given to me if we were in
>fact invaded by a foreign foe."
>>On March the 5th, President Roosevelt asked for a special and
>extraordinary session of Congress in Proclamation 2038. He called for the
>special session of Congress to meet on March the 9th at noon. And at that
>Congress, he presented a bill, an Act, to provide for relief in the
>existing national emergency in banking and for other purposes.
>>In the enabling portion of that Act it states:
>>"Be it enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the
>United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress hereby
>declares that a serious emergency exists and that it is imperatively
>necessary speedily to put into effect remedies of uniform national
>>In the Act of March 9, 1933, it further states in Title 1, Section 1:
>>"The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations
>heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the
>President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March
>the 4th, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by subdivision (b) of
>Section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended, are hereby approved
>and confirmed." 
>>This is the exact same wording as is found today in Title 12, USC 95 (b).
>The language in Title 12, USC 95 (b) is exactly the same as that found in
>the Act of March 9, 1933, Chapter 1, Title 1, Section 48, Statute 1. The
>Act of March 9, 1933, is still in full force and effect today. We are still
>under the Rule of Necessity. We are still in a declared state of national
>emergency, a state of emergency which has existed, uninterrupted, since
>1933, almost sixty five years.
>>The Act of October 6, 1917, states that this was:
>>"An Act To define, regulate, and punish trading with the enemy, and for
>other purposes."
>>In Section 2 of the Act of March 9, 1933,
>>"Subdivision (b) of Section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917 (40 Stat. L.
>411), as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows;"
>>"During time of war or during any other period of national emergency
>declared by the President, the President may, through any agency that be
>may designate, or otherwise, investigate, regulate, or prohibit, under such
>rules and regulations as be may prescribe, by means of licenses or
>otherwise, any transactions in foreign exchange, transfers of credit
>between or payments by banking institutions as defined by the President and
>export, hoarding, melting, or earmarkings of gold or silver coin or bullion
>or currency, by any person within the United States or anyplace subject to
>the jurisdiction thereof". 
>>From now on; as far as commercial, monetary or business transactions were
>concerned, the people of the United States were no longer differentiated
>from any other enemy of the United States. 
>>So Go Ahead, present your constitutional arguments that justify how a
>United States resident; with a United States Regional Postal Mailing
>Address and Emergency Services Number, most with a SSN registration number
>(number of a man)
>>that is involved in commercial credit, and is basically forced to use the
>military script Roosevelt required, will argue his constitutional rights to
>prevent this Jurisdiction, when i have not ever seen anything written by Mr
>Becraft or any others warning about this Venue. 
>>First, even if this venue does apply to you, make them prove it!
>>Why is it so hard, to stand on your Venue Constitutional arguement?
>>Oh that's right, you've got rights to talk about. 
>>If they would ever actually show your drivers license record, as a venue, 
>>or your check book, or your 9 digit regional address... then you could go
>after the constitutionality of the emergency, and all the other arguements,
>signature nom deguerre, etc on that document! However even the correct
>arguements applied by Mr Becraft, need to be applied to a Bill of
>Particulars, to the venue arguement only, and pushed through to the Supreme
>Court, if nescessary.
>>If they do not show you this document as evidence of venue, or the officer
>testifying you were in the venue, they have no case at law. 
>>In the other case, Mr John Citizen, at address, City, Federal zone
>>in his identification, has already proven the venue and his arguement
>about documents not in evidence is irrelevant. once the jurisdiction of the
>United States is in effect, your rights are no longer relevant to the
>staute except
>>as approved in the United States Code.
>>I am amazed to see the progress, and research done by you folks at bringing
>>up all the discrepancies in these agencies and their tyranny. Maybe it is
>>work done by Mr Becraft, Mr Wangrud, Mr Schiff, and on and on,... that has
>created the havoc in the IRS now, and the house of cards is shaky at best.
>>Either way, they do intend to crash the system, and let you re-volunteer
>>to enter the cashless system, course, most are there now i guess. You
>gonna make em prove the National ID card there in your wallet, so you can
>buy groceries, or cash your check, is a God given right also?
>>Since the Venue which creates Jurisdiction had to be in operation at the
>time of the Statute Violation, how does going to court give a venue that
>must have not existed at the time of statute. It is when the State acts
>without venue to him that is without the kingdom of the State, that the
>Laws of God, will be employed to End this Captivity. Since 1933 and through
>to 70 years shall God's people 
>>be under the yoke of their Earthly master. By then you will not buy nor
>sell without the Venue of the Beast. A wild Statement proven by 3 documents.
>>1. Public Law 104-208 sec 656, 657. The national ID card  Sept 30, 1996
>>2. The Electronic Funds Transfer Expansion Act of 1996. Cashless US, Apr
>30, 96
>>3. Executive Order 12938  (Be ready for 12919, when the real suspension of
>>Corpus occurs) 
>>Office of the Press Secretary
>>For Immediate Release                          November 12, 1997
>>On November 14, 1994, by Executive Order 12938, I declared a national
>emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the
>national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States posed
>by the proliferation of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons ("weapons
>of mass destruction") and the means of delivering such weapons.  Because
>the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the means of
>delivering them continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the
>national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, the
>national emergency declared on November 14, 1994, and extended on November
>14, 1995 and November 14, 1996, must continue in effect beyond November 14,
>>Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies
>Act (50 U.S.C. 622(d)), I am continuing the national emergency declared in
>Executive Order 12938.
>>This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to
>the Congress.
>>November 12, 1997.
>>Attached is my Argument for Emergency Martial Law rule.
>>EO 12919 is available by request.
>>Amazing what the Spirit of God reveals to those that Do His Will.
>>				May God bless you with his Grace
>>						Ed
>Communist Party directive issued in 1943: "Members and front organizations
>must continually embarrass, discredit and degrade our critics.... When
>obstructionists become too irritating, label them as fascist or Nazi or
>anti-Semitic [or Patriot extremists].... Constantly associate those who
>oppose us with those names that already have a bad smell. The association
>will, after enough repetition, become "fact" in the public mind." -- 1956
>Report of the House Committee on Un-American Activities (volume 1, page 347)

Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail