Time: Mon Dec 15 13:41:11 1997 To: Ed <watchman@pacifier.com> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: wrong argument Cc: Bcc: sls References: The "emergency" is bogus, and you know it. /s/ Paul Mitchell, Candidate for Congress http://supremelaw.com At 12:11 PM 12/15/97 -0800, you wrote: >>Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 12:06:46 -0800 >>Gentlemen, >> >>It appears to me that although everyone has this legal knowledge showing >>that there is no way the IRS has any Jurisdiction over the People, and >that it is voluntary; i must add.... it is voluntary, and that most are >volunteering. >>None of the Arguements disputed by Mr. Becraft entailed a venue arguement >over the military jurisdiction of the commander in chief. The IRS is >enforcing corporate statute over the people only when they engage in the >venue designated by the commander in chief under the current State of >Emergency. Do not believe for a minute, that i have not noticed the lack of >mention of this vital aspect, by the "most knowledgeable patriot attorney >in the country". >> >> >>>>If this whole thing didn't pertain solely to corporations, then why was >>>>the correcting amendment signed by the CORPORATE unit ??? >>>> >>>>Rusty >>>> Now from the above who is the "resident" in 1.1-1? Is the United >States "at home?" Is a "resident" having a PERMANENT address located "at >home" in Title 26 USC 7701a (39) if he can't be found "abroad" as stated in >Subdivision 1 of the 1913 Income Statute on page 166? Doesn't that apply >only to federal workers who are in a trade or business as noted in 26 USC >162? Do not these employees operate "abroad" in the foreign States as >representatives of Congress and not the people? >> >> >>This is where the story jumps the track. What and when and where, anything >occured in the 1800's >>as a building block, does not explain the Venue of the Jurisdiction of the >current democratic >>United States, which is bankrupt and acting under treaty requirements of >the International Monetary Fund, and World Bank. 22 USC 286 >> >>It is the Home Address and Voluntary Acts, of a Resident, that makes them >a resident in the first place. One must Identify the Venue, of the >Jurisdiction, and it is contained below: >> >>NATIONAL EMERGENCY: (as defined in Black's Law Dictionary) A state of >national crisis; a situation demanding immediate and extraordinary national >or federal action. Congress has made little or no distinction between a >"state of national emergency" and a "state of war". Brown v. Bernstein, >D.C.Pa., 49 F.Supp. 728, 732. >> >>In 1973, in Senate Report 93-549, the first sentence reads: >> >>"Since March the 9th, 1933, the United States has been in a state of >declared national emergency." >> >>"This vast range of powers, taken together, confer enough authority to >rule the country without reference to normal constitutional processes. >Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize >property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; >assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all >transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private >enterprise; restrict travel; and, in a plethora of particular ways, control >the lives of all American citizens" >> >>so the only argument, is that you do not fall within its grasp! otherwise >it is martial law, and that is why the constituional arguement is vague. >Not because it is incorrect, rather it is misapplied, and applied to late >in the situation. >> >>The only original constitutional question in the authority of the United >States, is the Venue of its Authority, and going off to the subject matter >of the Jurisdiction invalidates the previous arguement, in the eyes of the >Judge; >>Who uses a commercial admiralty courtroom to preside over all matters of >Individual, corporate, civil, and constitutional legal matters. It is the >silence about the Venue, and court procedures, where rather than inform and >protect the public the Judge gets a quick word for his proof of Venue, and >the authority of that Military flag hanging there by order of the Commander >in Chief of the United States, is enforced. And the Elite Patriot espouses >his Constitutional Rights, >>God Granted... which do not apply to Caesars kingdom, for Caesar thinks He >is god. >> >>WHAT IS THE VENUE OF THE UNITED STATES??? >>12 USC Section 95(b) reads: >>"The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations >heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the >President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March >the 4th, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by Subsection (b) of >Section 5 of the Act of October 6th, 1917, as amended [12 USCS Sec. 95a], >are hereby approved and confirmed. (Mar. 9, 1933, c. 1, Title I, Sec. 1, 48 >Stat. 1.)". >> >>Wherein Roosevelt wrote: >> >>"I am prepared under my constitutional duty to recommend the measures that >a stricken nation in the midst of a stricken world may require. These >measures, or such other measures as the Congress may build out of its >experience and wisdom, I shall seek, within my constitutional authority, to >bring to speedy adoption. But in the event that the Congress shall fail to >take one of these two courses, and in the event that the national emergency >is still critical, I shall not evade the clear course of duty that will >then confront me. I shall ask the Congress for the one remaining instrument >to meet the crisis broad Executive power to wage a war against the >emergency, as great as the power that would be given to me if we were in >fact invaded by a foreign foe." >> >>On March the 5th, President Roosevelt asked for a special and >extraordinary session of Congress in Proclamation 2038. He called for the >special session of Congress to meet on March the 9th at noon. And at that >Congress, he presented a bill, an Act, to provide for relief in the >existing national emergency in banking and for other purposes. >> >>In the enabling portion of that Act it states: >> >>"Be it enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the >United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress hereby >declares that a serious emergency exists and that it is imperatively >necessary speedily to put into effect remedies of uniform national >application." >> >>In the Act of March 9, 1933, it further states in Title 1, Section 1: >> >>"The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations >heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the >President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March >the 4th, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by subdivision (b) of >Section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended, are hereby approved >and confirmed." >> >>This is the exact same wording as is found today in Title 12, USC 95 (b). >The language in Title 12, USC 95 (b) is exactly the same as that found in >the Act of March 9, 1933, Chapter 1, Title 1, Section 48, Statute 1. The >Act of March 9, 1933, is still in full force and effect today. We are still >under the Rule of Necessity. We are still in a declared state of national >emergency, a state of emergency which has existed, uninterrupted, since >1933, almost sixty five years. >> >>The Act of October 6, 1917, states that this was: >> >>"An Act To define, regulate, and punish trading with the enemy, and for >other purposes." >> >>In Section 2 of the Act of March 9, 1933, >> >>"Subdivision (b) of Section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917 (40 Stat. L. >411), as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows;" >> >>"During time of war or during any other period of national emergency >declared by the President, the President may, through any agency that be >may designate, or otherwise, investigate, regulate, or prohibit, under such >rules and regulations as be may prescribe, by means of licenses or >otherwise, any transactions in foreign exchange, transfers of credit >between or payments by banking institutions as defined by the President and >export, hoarding, melting, or earmarkings of gold or silver coin or bullion >or currency, by any person within the United States or anyplace subject to >the jurisdiction thereof". >> >>From now on; as far as commercial, monetary or business transactions were >concerned, the people of the United States were no longer differentiated >from any other enemy of the United States. >> >>So Go Ahead, present your constitutional arguments that justify how a >United States resident; with a United States Regional Postal Mailing >Address and Emergency Services Number, most with a SSN registration number >(number of a man) >>that is involved in commercial credit, and is basically forced to use the >military script Roosevelt required, will argue his constitutional rights to >prevent this Jurisdiction, when i have not ever seen anything written by Mr >Becraft or any others warning about this Venue. >> >>First, even if this venue does apply to you, make them prove it! >>Why is it so hard, to stand on your Venue Constitutional arguement? >>Oh that's right, you've got rights to talk about. >>If they would ever actually show your drivers license record, as a venue, >>or your check book, or your 9 digit regional address... then you could go >after the constitutionality of the emergency, and all the other arguements, >signature nom deguerre, etc on that document! However even the correct >arguements applied by Mr Becraft, need to be applied to a Bill of >Particulars, to the venue arguement only, and pushed through to the Supreme >Court, if nescessary. >> >>If they do not show you this document as evidence of venue, or the officer >testifying you were in the venue, they have no case at law. >> >>In the other case, Mr John Citizen, at address, City, Federal zone >>in his identification, has already proven the venue and his arguement >about documents not in evidence is irrelevant. once the jurisdiction of the >United States is in effect, your rights are no longer relevant to the >staute except >>as approved in the United States Code. >> >>I am amazed to see the progress, and research done by you folks at bringing >>up all the discrepancies in these agencies and their tyranny. Maybe it is >the >>work done by Mr Becraft, Mr Wangrud, Mr Schiff, and on and on,... that has >created the havoc in the IRS now, and the house of cards is shaky at best. >>Either way, they do intend to crash the system, and let you re-volunteer >>to enter the cashless system, course, most are there now i guess. You >gonna make em prove the National ID card there in your wallet, so you can >buy groceries, or cash your check, is a God given right also? >> >>Since the Venue which creates Jurisdiction had to be in operation at the >time of the Statute Violation, how does going to court give a venue that >must have not existed at the time of statute. It is when the State acts >without venue to him that is without the kingdom of the State, that the >Laws of God, will be employed to End this Captivity. Since 1933 and through >to 70 years shall God's people >>be under the yoke of their Earthly master. By then you will not buy nor >sell without the Venue of the Beast. A wild Statement proven by 3 documents. >> >>1. Public Law 104-208 sec 656, 657. The national ID card Sept 30, 1996 >> >>2. The Electronic Funds Transfer Expansion Act of 1996. Cashless US, Apr >30, 96 >> >>3. Executive Order 12938 (Be ready for 12919, when the real suspension of >Habeus >>Corpus occurs) >> >>THE WHITE HOUSE >> >>Office of the Press Secretary >>_________________________________________________________________ >> >>For Immediate Release November 12, 1997 >> >>CONTINUATION OF EMERGENCY REGARDING WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION >> >>On November 14, 1994, by Executive Order 12938, I declared a national >emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the >national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States posed >by the proliferation of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons ("weapons >of mass destruction") and the means of delivering such weapons. Because >the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the means of >delivering them continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the >national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, the >national emergency declared on November 14, 1994, and extended on November >14, 1995 and November 14, 1996, must continue in effect beyond November 14, >1997. >> >>Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies >Act (50 U.S.C. 622(d)), I am continuing the national emergency declared in >Executive Order 12938. >> >>This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to >the Congress. >> >>THE WHITE HOUSE, WILLIAM J. CLINTON >>November 12, 1997. >> >> >>Attached is my Argument for Emergency Martial Law rule. >>EO 12919 is available by request. >> >>Amazing what the Spirit of God reveals to those that Do His Will. >> >> >> May God bless you with his Grace >> >> Ed >> >Communist Party directive issued in 1943: "Members and front organizations >must continually embarrass, discredit and degrade our critics.... When >obstructionists become too irritating, label them as fascist or Nazi or >anti-Semitic [or Patriot extremists].... Constantly associate those who >oppose us with those names that already have a bad smell. The association >will, after enough repetition, become "fact" in the public mind." -- 1956 >Report of the House Committee on Un-American Activities (volume 1, page 347) > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail