Time: Tue Dec 16 05:21:47 1997 To: FTUN <FTUN@aol.com> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Becraft does not read his own Supreme Court's rulings Cc: Bcc: sls References: No. Income has been consistently defined, most notably in Eisner v. Macomber. See Gilbertson's AFFIDAVIT OF APPLICABLE LAW AND DENIAL OF SPECIFIC LIABILITY, in the Supreme Law Library at the URL just below my name here: /s/ Paul Mitchell, Candidate for Congress http://supremelaw.com At 04:03 AM 12/16/97 EST, you wrote: >Paul, >This may seem stupid, but do you claim >that you actually received income >when you battle the IRS?
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail