Time: Tue Dec 16 17:21:18 1997 To: From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Soul Control (fwd) Cc: <Emmilene@aol.com> Bcc: sls, friends, liberty lists, 3cc, psc References: For, what does it profit anyone, to gain the entire world, but to lose their very souls? [paraphrase from The Holy Bible] /s/ Paul Mitchell, Candidate for Congress http://supremelaw.com <snip> > >A terrific article. >Read it all, it's outstanding. >It really makes you stop and think. > >emmilene > >From: Jim Strode <theduke@mail.swcp.com> >> >>U.S. GUILTY OF SOUL CONTROL - A CAPITAL OFFENSE >> >> >> http://www.TheWinds.org/ >> >> Editorial 12/6/97 >> >> >> U.S. GUILTY OF SOUL CONTROL >> -- A CAPITAL OFFENSE >> >>A strange prophecy uttered centuries ago seems to be revealing itself. >>"For wheresoever the carcass is, there will the eagles be gathered >> together." Matthew 24:28. Quite literally it could read, >>"For wherever you see the dead body, there will the scavengers >> be gathered together." >> >>Our nation today could well be characterized as a dead body on which >>the scavengers are taking their toll, but most of this nation's citizens >>do not seem to get the point or recognize what constitutes the death >>of the body. The death of the body is not when one loses his gun. >>It is not when the Constitution is abrogated. It is not even the death >>of the body when one is not able to vote. The death is when one loses >>his soul to the control of another. >> >>It is recognized that our country has been responsible for some serious >>crimes. Our leaders have plotted the assassination of men who are >>presidents of other sovereign nations. The country is guilty of illegally >>confiscating foreign lands as in the case of Hawaii. Even so, that does not >>constitute our dead body. Things have changed for generations. Nations >>have risen and fallen. As population increases, there is no way the >>status quo can be maintained. As technology expands, the support for that >>technology also expands, placing upon the society pressures that have >>to be adjusted. >> >>The Native American was destined to be displaced. While men can live >>as natives did when there are millions of square miles of vacant land, >>as the population increases there is simply not room for everyone >>to live in that way. Can you imagine how it would be for five billion >>people all needing a hundred square miles for hunting or fishing? >>While it is romantic to consider the free and unfettered lifestyle >>of the Native American, it is impossible for that lifestyle to continue >>with so many humans sharing the same space. >> >>The U.S. now plans to disarm its citizens over time. This is an >>established fact. Today there are many organizations who are resisting >>this change. Both sides look at the issue differently. The advocates of >>disarmament claim that the Constitution only guarantees that there be a >>well organized army to protect the citizens, while the other side says >>that the citizens should be allowed to possess weapons. Everyone takes >>a position. By and by, change comes even if over the body of the resister. >>Someone has said, they will get my gun when they pry it out of my cold, >>dead hand. That may very well be what it takes, but they will do it. >>Native Americans said, they will take my land over my dead body, >>and so they did. >> >>The United Nations is the new wave. Sovereign states are no longer the >>picture of the powers that be. It is decreed that all who cling to their >>sovereign states will simply be removed with those states over their dead >>bodies. While these issues may be important to individuals, they are not >>the vital issues. Change is inevitable and predictable. In some ways >>change is necessary. There is no inherent evil in one-world government. >>Is not God's government a single government? The evil comes when men rule >>over the consciences of another. This constitutes the evil that is >>overpowering the earth. >> >>There are those who proclaim that the U.S. is planning a chip to implant >>under the skin and that constitutes the mark of the beast. My question is, >>how would that constitute the mark of the beast any more than a new hip >>joint planted under the skin or a tooth filling put into the mouth? >>How would a social security number placed on the skin be different >>than your number placed on your card? You are still numbered. >> >>Various entities have warned Americans that their liberties are being >>taken away. They have said that we must stay alert and not let the >>politicians give our heritage away. They warn against the government >>coming to take their weapons or that they will be placing the "mark" >>upon or in them. I stand amazed at how blind these individuals seem to be. >>How sleepy and dopey as if under the influence of too much wine. >>They are like men chained to a dungeon wall warning the other prisoners >>to beware of those who will try and come to put chains on them. A man is >>truly asleep when he warns another man that his house may soon burn down >>when the truth is that house was ashes years ago. >> >>In the Third Article of the Bill of Rights it says: "Congress shall >>make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting >>the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech." >>Also stated as the First Amendment, this is one of the grand and most >>touted Articles and the one in which Americans boast themselves the most. >>Yet, this Article has been thrown out of the Constitution long ago. >>It will not hold in any court of law. >> >>I can very well prove this assertion. Let us suppose I am religious and I >>believe in certain things. Let us suppose I believe that my property taxes >>are going to support the public schools. Let us further suppose that I >>believe that the public schools are degrading my children by teaching >>them the view that homosexuality is a viable alternative lifestyle. >>This is not to make an argument either way, this is simply to say that >>I believe in my soul that it is wrong to teach children that. Let's >>further suppose that I believe the schools are taking God out of the >>hearts of children and placing a hedonistic religion in their hearts >>instead. So far, so good. The government would say, "believe anything you >>like." But, there is more to Article 3. It says Congress will not >>prohibit the "free exercise" of that belief. >> >>To carry out my faith, or to freely exercise my faith, let us say I >>believed that I should not pay to support what I saw was destroying young >> minds. I saw that by paying for it I was giving it power. Understand >>that I am not saying that others may not do what they believe in if they >>believe in that sort of thing. This "not paying" my property tax would >>constitute the "free exercise" of my faith. While I may very well be able >>to withhold my property tax, I would have my property confiscated. >>If I withheld my income taxes because they support abortions, >>assassinations, world conquest, genocide and sanctions against other >>sovereign lands under false pretenses, I may very well be jailed >>for income tax evasion or some other crime. Can you see, we may believe >>what we like, but we may not freely exercise what we believe in. >>In no way can this nation be characterized as a free country until >>one can freely exercise his faith. We are only free to do what we are >>told we can do, but we may not use our conscience as a guide. >> >>We must use state law as the guide and this was essentially the position >>in the Soviet Union and other communist countries. Our nation has gone >>into the business of soul control and this is what constitutes taking >>the mark of the nation (beast). The mark is not a piece of plastic under >>the skin. It is a soul that has given itself over in his thinking >>(forehead) and in his labors (hand).The mark is already here and not >>some day. Men are already chained, and not chained someday. So what >>if our guns are taken away someday, our souls have been usurped already, >>our constitution destroyed already. >> >>I am not saying we should wake up and keep the evil away, I am saying >>wake up and see that the evil has already arrived. The thief already >>came in and stole just about all that is of any value - your ability to >>choose what you want to do with your life conscientiously without regard >>as to what the state says about it. If the state chooses other things for >>you, you must comply. Of course, I am not speaking of the leaders of the >>nation. They may fornicate themselves, their children, and just about >>anyone else. They may plot the murder of their enemies. I am speaking of >>the normal, average citizen. It is he who must obey the law. One may know >>this to be true from the latest ABC presentation about J.F. Kennedy which >>aired December 4th. President Kennedy did and planned things which would >>be crimes for any common man, but his police guards turned their backs >>to his crimes. Even J. Edgar Hoover turned a blind eye. >> >>The issue of gun control is now evident. It is true that guns are not the >>problem as some men say. So what if guns are taken away, men can use >>Molotov cocktails. Will the state then outlaw gas? If gas were outlawed, >>then men could kill with a match by setting fire to his opponent's house. >>If matches were confiscated, then men could kill with a rope and use it >>to hang their opponent. Does the state plan to put us all in >>strait-jackets and feed us with machines so we will be good and >>not hurt anyone? No, gun control is not about people killing other people. >>It is about the control of the soul. >> >>Should not a man be judged for his crimes rather than judged for things he >>possesses? Should all water glasses be confiscated because some of them >>were used to commit murder? No, things are not the problem and guns are >>not the problem. The problem is that the state wants its mark upon every >>citizen and it will not share that mark with the God of heaven. It demands >>that men will pay their dues and do what they are told, even if it does not >>make sense and even if it is not according to their consciences. The state >>does not need to meet the minds of its citizens, it only needs to command. >> >>The evidence for this is plain. It is considered a hate crime to speak >>against homosexuality in some circles, but it is not a hate crime to speak >>against child molestation. May I ask what is the difference? The state has >>decreed you may have sex with consenting adults of the same sex, but not >>with consenting children. If same sex is good as the state proclaims, then >>why withhold something good from children? The Scriptures condemn either >>one of these practices, but the state picks and chooses. The state declares >>that some perversion is good and right if practiced after a certain age. >>Who made up this age that men can come to in order to be right about >>immorality? >> >>As a Christian I use the Scriptures as my authority for my religious >>beliefs, but what does the state use? If the Scriptures are discounted >>by the state, then what do they use to say anything is wrong or right >>-- a man's opinion? Are we to follow a man now? Is this a cult? >>Has God become so obsolete and inferior to man that we must now trust >>the state to tell us what is moral and what is immoral? From all >>evidence, the state sure doesn't know and cannot judge these things. >>Who says that child molestation is wrong? I only know one authoritative >>source. That source is the Bible. If the Bible is not considered, >>then who can make this judgment? Anything is right that any man wants >>to do. Is not one man's opinion as good as another? Who is the state to >>proclaim itself the revealer of morals? The state may very well know >>how to build roads or fix sewers but it is not qualified to judge >>what is morally right. >> >>Why is it that national leaders may plan the assassination of other men, >>but the citizens may not? Why is it that the U.S. may withhold its >>dues to the United Nations until it is satisfied with its direction, >>but citizens may not withhold their taxes until the citizens are >>satisfied with the nation's direction? >> >>There are other evidences for soul control. Our nation may put someone >>in jail for the smallest amount of marijuana, but they may possess >>cigarettes which have a higher risk factor for health. I do not use drugs, >>myself, but I fail to see how a woman can have control over her own >>body and abort a baby while a man cannot have control over his own >>body and smoke marijuana. Which is more important, a new creature >>formed in the image of God or some hemp? Why is it that there are black >>clubs and black organizations in certain corporations which are not >>considered racist, but white clubs or white organizations are considered >>racist? Why is it that we might mock the actions of a white male, >>but when we mock the actions of a woman or racial minority it is >>considered prejudice? Men strain at a gnat and swallow a camel. >>Again, if true reason and sanity were displayed, even a small child >>would know the answers to these questions, but since men are working to >>enslave the consciences of other men and you have soul control, >>there is no reason but only an insane delusion as to what constitutes >>right and wrong. >> >>Generations ago many of the citizens of the English Commonwealth were >>feeling the bite of soul control. They were able to resolve the situation >>by moving to America, "the land of the free." Now that America practices >>the same coercion of conscience, where do the citizens go now? >>The citizens are forced into a corner and react as a she bear with her >>cubs. This is the issue that underlies much of the upheaval and >>discontent. No man likes having his conscience messed with by anyone. >>This is not a racial truth but a human one. Now there is no place >>for the oppressed to flee. There is only one solution. The system must >>be brought to its end. The earth must be destroyed. Soul control is a >>capital offense. God reserves the domain of conscience for Himself. >>When men usurp that authority and strive to control men's consciences >>(that which God does not even do), the God of heaven bears His arm and >>things are righted. Soul control was practiced on black slaves and the >>nation was divided and nearly ruined with civil war because of it. >The Lord fixes what we break. >> >>The eagle is a fitting symbol of this nation. This scavenger is now >>eating the flesh off the citizens of this once great country. >>Although eagles are more characterized as liking to eat fish, >>the symbol is appropriate. According to Webster's, a slang use >>of the term "fish" is: "an incompetent player whose incompetence >>can be exploited". Another meaning is: "a new prison inmate." >>I think both definitions fit precisely. Yes, eagles like to eat fish also >>if you are one. I think we are getting what we deserve. Our freedoms >>will not be returned to us. No, they won't. The only answer these days >>is to be free and take the consequences. The answer is to refrain >>from the mark and take the results of doing that. Oh, yes, >>the Scriptures say, "and that no man might buy or sell save >>he that had the mark." This beast wants our worship, he wants >>soul control. It says, as many as would not worship (submit and honor) >>this beast should be killed. Well, I have decided I am not going >>to let him control my soul and I will freely exercise my faith anyway. >>While most men proclaim, "we have no other king but Caesar," a few still >>say, "Father, Thy will be done." >> >> >> Copyright © 1997, The WINDS. >> ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. >> http://www.TheWinds.org >> Contact The WINDS webmaster. >> >> >> <@{{>< <@{{>< <@{{>< <@{{>< <@{{>< <@{{>< <@{{>< >> >>"Of all contrivances for cheating the laboring classes of mankind, >>none has been more effective than that which deludes them with >>paper money". >> >>- Daniel Webster >> >>*************************** >>"I see in the near future a crisis approaching. It unnerves me >>and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country.... >>the Money Power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign"' >>by working upon the prejudices of the people, until the wealth is >>aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed. >>I feel at this moment more anxiety for the safety of my country >>than ever before, even in the midst of war." >> >>-Abraham Lincoln,- In a letter written to William Elkin just after the >>passage of the National Banking Act of 1863 and less than five >>months before he was assassinated. >> >>******************************************* >>"... God forbid we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion. >>The people cannot be all,and always, well informed. The part which is >>wrong will be discontented, in proportion to the importance of the facts >>they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions, >>it is lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. >>... And what country can preserve its liberties, if it's rulers are not >>warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of >>resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to >>the facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a >>century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, >>with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure." >> >>-- Thomas Jefferson, Nov. 13, 1787, letter to William S. Smith, see >>Jefferson On Democracy, 20 (S. Padover ed. 1939). >> >> >><@{{>< <@{{>< <@{{>< <@{{>< <@{{>< <@{{>< <@{{><
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail