Time: Mon Feb 17 11:14:22 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA22254 for [address in tool bar]; Mon, 17 Feb 1997 07:54:29 -0700 (MST) Delivered-To: liberty-and-justice-outgoing@majordomo.pobox.com Date: Mon, 17 Feb 1997 11:09:44 -0800 To: rchong@fcc.gov From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: L&J: Oklahoma City bombing TO: Rachelle Chong Federal Communications Commissioner FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell Counselor at Law DATE: February 17, 1997 SUBJECT: Oklahoma City bombing This is an unsolicited request that you take a closer look at important evidence which is now coming forth about the Oklahoma City bombing. You are a communications commissioner, and a graduate of U.C. Berkeley, so I am confident that the technical aspects of what I am about to share with you will be easily within your ability to comprehend. Sound waves travel at a very predictable speed, depending on the ambient air pressure and temperature. A shock wave from an intense blast behaves like any other sound wave -- it propagates outwards in the shape of a sphere, attenuating in proportion to the cube of the distance from the blast origin. If you assume the federal government's allegation about the blast origin (the fertilizer truck), you can then propagate that shock wave outwards, into various structural components of the federal building which was destroyed. The bearing columns are very critical components, because they hold up everything else. Here's the rub: certain columns were completely destroyed, and yet these were measurably a greater distance from the alleged origin of the blast, than several other columns which remained standing after the explosion. Simple science will tell you that it is, therefore, very unlikely (statistically improbable) that such massive destruction could have occurred from a single fertilizer bomb, detonated from a small truck at the front of the building. Another hypothesis is much more worthy of examination, in light of these bearing columns which remained standing, even though they were closer to the alleged blast origin, than others which failed completely, i.e. failed at their base. The fertilizer bomb was a detonator itself, which triggered pressure-sensitive charges which had been drilled into the bearing columns, most probably in the parking basement, most probably of the C-4 plastic variety. A parametric method can be used to compute estimated probabilities for this hypothesis. The blast propagated outwards at a very precise velocity, taking into account the weather data for that particular date and time. The pressure detonators in the column charges had a rated "response" time, i.e. upon detecting a rapid increase in ambient air pressure, the detonators would have a small, but measurable delay before activating. Once activated, these detonators effectively decapitated the columns, right at their bases, causing everything they were bearing to collapse into a heap of rubble, crushing many lives to death. As the larger, secondary explosions propagated their own shock waves outwards, nearby seismic stations picked up distinct rumbles in ground waves. There have been quite a few references to the seismograph readings which show two distinct episodes of shock, a smaller initial one, followed by a larger secondary one. Using elaborate mathematics and a proper computer simulation, this hypothesis can be tested so as to predict the seismograph readings via simulation, and then to compare the simulated results with the actual seismograph results obtained that the fateful moment. The precise delay between the "fertilizer" bomb, and the larger secondary explosions, will carry forward to the seismograph readings, if this hypothesis is correct. Until this kind of analysis is done, and until all the evidence is presented to a lawful grand jury in Oklahoma, I do not believe it is in the public's interest to stifle discussion of such matters as these. It may be in the interests of the federal government to stifle this discussion, particularly if its agents were in any way responsible for the worst act of domestic terrorism this country has ever witnessed. Sooner or later, the truth shall prevail. I say, the sooner the better. The FCC has a preeminent responsibility to the truth, not to encouraging the emergence of a Fourth Reich in this country. Thank you very much for your consideration. Since I do not have the email addresses for the other Federal Communications Commissioners, I would appreciate it very much if you would share a copy of this message to each and every one of them. /s/ Paul Mitchell Counselor at Law copies: Supreme Law School clients, friends, general broadcast lists ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0 on Intel 80586 CPU web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ======================================================================== =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Unsub info - send e-mail to majordomo@majordomo.pobox.com, with "unsubscribe liberty-and-justice" in the body (not the subject) Liberty-and-Justice list-owner is Mike Goldman <whig@pobox.com>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail