Time: Mon Feb 17 12:43:47 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA12707; Mon, 17 Feb 1997 08:48:04 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 17 Feb 1997 12:35:04 -0800 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: USA OR USSR Part 1 [fwd] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit >Date: Mon, 17 Feb 1997 07:08:38 -0800 >From: Douglas Walker <apta@discover.net> >Organization: APTA >To: snetnews <snetnews@world.std.com> >Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: USA OR USSR Part 1]] > >The following was well thought out. >-- >Doug <snip> > COMMUNISM IN AMERICA > Do You Live in the U.S.S.A. (U.S.A.)? > > > "This case involves a cancer in our body politic. It is a measure > of the disease which afflicts us. Army surveillance, like Army > regimentation, is at war with the principles of the First Amend- > ment. Those who already walk submissively will say there is no > cause for alarm. But submissiveness is not our heritage. The > First Amendment was designed to allow rebellion to remain as our > heritage. The Constitution was designed to keep the government > off the backs of the people. The Bill of Rights was added to keep > the precincts of belief and expression, of the press, of politi- > cal and social activities free from surveillance. The Bill of > Rights was designed to keep agents of government and official > eavesdroppers away from assemblies of people. The aim was to > allow men to be free and independent and to assert their rights > against government. There can be no influence more paralyzing of > that objective than Army surveillance. When an intelligence > officer looks over every nonconformist's shoulder in the library, > or walks invisibly by his side in a picket line, or infiltrates > his club, the America once extolled as the voice of liberty heard > around the world no longer is cast in the image which Jefferson > and Madison designed, but more in the Russian image,..." Laird > v. Tatum, 408 U.S. 1, p. 28 and 29. > > If you are a person who even remotely follows the national > media, you probably understand that the major portion of the > United States' defense spending is justified by the never ending > cliche "We must prevent communism from spreading over the world." > Ever since World War II there has been a so called 'cold war' > against communism, as well as several police actions (i.e., Korea > and Vietnam) based on the same ideal - the prevention of commu- > nism abroad. > > The question posed here is, have the American people been so > busy preventing communism abroad that they have failed to recog- > nize it in their own governmental institutions? The shocked > reader's first reaction, as was my own, is to deny any such thing > could possibly have happened, and to stand, think and speak in > defense of his beloved country. But what if it were true? What > if your government has institutions in line with the communist > plan; would you then be defending communism? > > I hold a love for my country as well as the next man, this is > why I would fight the enemies of its original institutions no > matter whether the enemy be a foreign government or domestic > persons creating and establishing communist doctrine and institu- > tions in our own government. > > Remember one thing, the easiest way to deter us from looking at > communism in America is to make us believe that all communist > enemies are in another country, no matter which country that > might be, but never even hint that communism flourishes in the > United States with little or no resistance. > > So let's take a serious look at what is happening to the insti- > tutions of Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness, upon > which this country's government was formed. Let us also take a > look at how those institutions might be undermined before an > unknowing people. > > "We the People" established a government for the protection > of "ourselves and our posterity." > > "WE THE PEOPLE of the United States, in Order to form a more > perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, > provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and > secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, > do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States > of America." Preamble of the United States Constitution, 1787. > > "We the People" were clearly one Nation, one race: > > "NATION -- 1. A body of people inhabiting the same country, > or united under the same sovereign or government; - - -. Nation, > as its etymology imports, originally denoted a family or race of > men,- - -." An American Dictionary of the English Language, Noah > Webster (1828), reprinted by Foundation for American Christian > Education (1967). > > And, as stated in our Pledge of Allegiance, an 'indivisible' > nation: > > "INDIVISIBLE -- That cannot be divided, separated or broken; > not separable into parts. - - -." An American Dictionary of the > English Language, Noah Webster (1828), reprinted by Foundation > for American Christian Education (1967). > > It seems, then, that the fastest way to undermine a nation is > to make it divisible - "A house divided cannot stand," (Abraham > Lincoln). Lincoln knew this, and in perpetuating the Civil War, > he destroyed the sovereignty of the posterity who formed this > nation, turning the United States into an international body. > > In order to answer the initial question posed, we must first > define what communism is so that we can readily recognize its > elements at play. > > Let us first look at the institution of the largest communist > block in the world, the USSR: > > "- - - The principle applied in the USSR is that of Social- > ism: ..." Art. 12, Constitution of the Union of Soviet Socialist > Republics (USSR), December 5, 1936 as amended. > > Webster's further defines communism as: > > "communism -- 1 b: a system or condition real or imagined in > which goods are owned commonly rather than privately and are > available as needed to each one in a unified group, sometimes > inclusive, and often composed of members living and working > together: - - - 2 a: a social and political doctrine or movement > based upon revolutionary Marxian socialism that interprets histo- > ry as a relentless class war eventually to result everywhere in > the victory of the proletariat and the social ownership of the > means of production with relative social and economic equality of > all and ultimately to lead to a classless society b: BOLSHEVISM > c: a totalitarian system of government in which the State as > owner of the major industries and acting through the medium of a > single authoritarian party controls in large measure the econom- > ic, social and cultural life of the society." Webster's Third > International Dictionary, 1966. > > We can see that the term "communism" denotes a sacrifice of all > personal property and rights for the good of the whole number, > based on the ideals of socialism, thus resulting in the destruc- > tion of the individual character of man by consolidating that > character into one artificial being, the State. > > The communist constitution claims a basis of 'socialism' for > government. > > "socialism -- 2 a: a system or condition of society or group > of living in which there is no private property b: a system > or condition of society in which the means of production are > owned and controlled by the State c: a stage of society that > in Marxist theory is transitional between capitalism and commu- > nism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and > payments to individuals according to their work." Webster's > Third World Dictionary, 1966. > > Now that we have a firm definition of what communism is, we > will endeavor to make some comparisons between communism and > institutions which have developed in the United States. To do > this we will further reference the constitution of the USSR. > > I don't know if you have noticed, but the rights of the indi- > vidual are becoming more and more restricted every day in the > United States. > > For instance, the most basic rights of Life and Liberty depend > upon a right we all hold very dear. The right to work. Try to > get a job without a social security number, or ask your employer > if you can work without one. I have seen enough evidence to know > without a number, you will be deprived of the right to work. > > What kind of scheme is social security that it can have such a > devastating affect on our lives? Black's Law Dictionary calls it > 'social insurance'. > > Social Insurance. A comprehensive welfare plan established by > law, generally compulsory in nature, and based on a program which > spreads the cost of benefits among the entire population rather > than on individual recipients. The federal government began to > use insurance programs in 1935 with the passage of the Social > Security Act. The basic federal and state approaches to social > insurance presently in use are: Old Age, Survivors, and Disabili- > ty Insurance (i.e. social security); Medicare and Medicaid; > unemployment insurance; and worker's compensation. Black's Law > Dict. 5Ed., p 724. > > Arthur J. Altmeyer, the author of the Social Security Act of > 1935, in speaking of Social Security says: > > "- - - child's being issued an 'insurance policy' on the day > he was born [is] to protect him against all major economic mis- > fortunes which might befall him during his lifetime. This is the > reason that he [Altmeyer] displayed some irritation when Lord > Beveridge was hailed in 1942 as the originator of the idea of > 'cradle to the grave' insurance when he made his famous report, > 'Social Insurance and Allied Services'. > "- - - - - Strangely enough, while throughout the rest of > the world there is the tendency to use 'social security' in an > expansive sense, we in this country are inclined to use it more > restrictively as the synonym for only one form of social insur- > ance, namely, our federal old age, survivors', and disability > insurance system." The Formative Years of Social Security, by > Arthur J. Altmeyer, p. 5. > > The Social Security Act itself says that it is social insur- > ance: > > "Sec. 702. The Board shall perform the duties imposed upon > it by this Act and shall also have the duty of studying and > making recommendations as to the most effective methods of pro- > viding economic security through social insurance, and as to > legislation and matters of administrative policy concerning old- > age pensions, unemployment compensation, accident compensation, > and related subjects." Social Security Act, 49 STAT 620 at 636 > (1935). > > Further, this scheme requires mandatory contributions through > FICA and the personal income tax. Where do these funds go? They > are distributed to non-productive persons who have neglected to > provide for their future security. > > What does the communist constitution provide for? > > "The jurisdiction of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, > as represented by its highest organs of state power and organs of > state administration, embraces: (o) Organization of state insur- > ance." Art 14, Const. of the USSR. > > And for what purpose ? > > "- - - provision of a wide network of sanatoria, rest > homes...." Art 119, Const. of the USSR. > > "... right to maintenance in old age and also in case of > sickness or disability. This right is ensured by the extensive > development of social insurance...." Art 120, Const. of the USSR. > > The Social Security Act of 1935 provides for: (1) Disability > compensation - Title V part 4; (2) Old age assistance and bene- > fits - Title I and II; and, (3) Unemployment compensation - Title > III. All of this in a comprehensive plan of social insurance > that you are being compelled to join, or starve to death because > no one will let you work without the Social Security number. Is > this a protection of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness ? > > Just who's constitution was this plan formed under, that of the > USA or that of the USSR? > > Let's make another comparison. Have you ever thought of teach- > ing your children at home because you didn't like what they're > thought in public school? The first thought that comes to most > people's minds is that they will have their children taken away > by the State because they aren't in school. In fact, this has > happened many times in this country; you may have heard it in the > news. Compulsory education is a good thing, right...? > > "... universal and compulsory education; by free education up > to and including the seventh grade; . . ." Art 121, Const. of the > USSR. > > The USSR thought so, but where did we get the idea ? > > How about letting women have the right to vote in a country > founded upon family government (i.e., the head of the household > casting the vote for the family)? > > "Women in the USSR are accorded equal rights with men in all > spheres of economic, government, cultural, political and other > public activity. - - -" Art 122, Const. of the USSR. > > "Women have the right to elect and be elected on equal terms > with men." Art 137, Const. of the USSR. > > The family is supposed to be a singular unit. Throughout > history, the male of the species has played the dominant roll. > Okay, let's make men and women equal; but remember that a house > divided will not stand. Look what this has done to the American > family (e.g., the national divorce rate). Again, it seems that > we have followed communist (anti-christ) doctrine in amending our > constitution. > > "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not > be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on > account of sex." 19th Amendment to the U.S. Const. > > We have secret elections in the United States today. "The Life > of John Marshall," by A.J. Beveridge, shows that originally > elections weren't secret because your vote was cast out loud; > this insured that the vote was properly recorded, plus everybody > knew where his neighbor stood. > > Where do secret elections come from? You guessed it - > > "Voting at elections of deputies is secret." Art 140, Const. > of the USSR. > > "- - - Deputies--are chosen by the electors on the basis of > universal, equal and direct suffrage by secret ballot." Art 134, > Const. of the USSR. > > In the counties in Oregon, and may other States, Deputy Dis- > trict Attorneys are appointed, not elected, even when Oregon's > constitution requires otherwise: > > "Prosecuting attorneys. There shall be elected by districts > comprised of one, or more counties, a sufficient number of prose- > cuting Attorneys, who shall be the law officers of the State, and > of the counties within their respective districts, and shall > perform such duties pertaining to the administration of Law, and > general police as the Legislative Assembly may direct.--" Art VII > (original) Sec 17, Oregon Constitution, 1857. > > But forget the Oregon Constitution; in Oregon the Constitution > of the USSR supplies the proper method: > > "Area, district, and city procurators are appointed by the > Procurators of the Union Republics,..." Art 116, Const. of the > USSR. > > Note that deputy district attorney's in Oregon are appointed > and not elected as per Oregon's Constitution, which says as many > as needed shall be elected. > > But we are one of the most progressed nations in the world! We > let anyone be a citizen regardless of race, color or creed and > regardless of the Preamble of the United States Constitution > which declares that the constitution was made for the protection > of the posterity of the white race that formed it. That is what > the Civil War was fought over. Unfortunately, not only did the > South lose but the Constitution of the United States lost also. > > "Equality of rights of citizens of the USSR, irrespective of > their nationality or race, in all spheres of economic, govern- > ment, cultural, political and other public activity, is an inde- > feasible law. > "Any direct or indirect restriction of the rights of, or, > conversely, the establishment of any direct or indirect privi- > leges for, citizens on account of their race or nationality, as > well as any advocacy of racial or national exclusiveness or > hatred and contempt, is punishable by law." Art 123, Const. of > the USSR. > > Now compare this to the first section of the Fourteenth Amend- > ment: > > "Sec 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, > and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the > United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State > shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges > or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any > State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without > due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdic- > tion the equal protection of the laws." Fourteenth Amendment to > the United States Constitution, 1868. > > "Sec. 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote > shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any > State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servi- > tude." Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, > 1870. > > But we couldn't possibly affect the institutions of liberty, > upon which our country was formed, by allowing millions of alien > non-whites that previously lived under communist rule to come to > our country, become citizens and a part of our government as > officials - or could we? > > The Supreme Court appears to have ruled that anything from > atheism to devil worship is a religion protected under the First > Article of the Bill of Rights, when this country was founded by > Christian men. Where did the Supreme court get this great idea? > > "... Freedom of religious worship and freedom of anti-reli- > gious propaganda is recognized for all citizens." Art 124, Const. > of the USSR. > > Could this be where the idea came from ? > > Let's take a look at our courts. I have been told, and ob- > served (or heard) others being told, by judges, when they were > using their rights as a defense, that the law says what it says > and that the judges have to follow it regardless of rights or > constitutional protections claimed by the party. > > "Judges are independent and subject only to the law." Art > 112, Const. of the USSR. > > Bound only to the law? What happened to a man's rights, or did > he give them up for the good of the whole? > > What about some of our other basic rights, like our right to > travel? No, you don't have that right either! > > "481.095 Privilege of motorist to use highways. Subject to > a compliance with the motor vehicle law of this state, owners and > operators of motor vehicles are granted the privilege of using > the highways of this state." ORS 481.095. > > Maybe the right to ownership of property, keeping in mind that > the free use of it is part of ownership. What's the point of > owning property if you can't use it whenever, and in the way, you > want as long as you don't harm or endanger anyone while doing so. > > We can build a house, if we can get a "permit" (permission from > the State). We can use our cars if we license ourselves first > and then license, register and insure our cars, pass D.E.Q., and > go once around the mulberry bush (sorry, once around the mulberry > bush hasn't been added yet). We can install a wood stove, a > furnace, wiring or remodel our homes, but not without permission > (a permit). > > But if we are hungry, because we haven't been able to find work > in an economy destroyed by the Federal Reserve Bank Corporation, > we can go out and bring home a fish or game animal so we don't > have to go on welfare. We had better not try it, or we'll be > pinched for poaching if we didn't ask the State for the privilege > (license-permit). If we don't have the money for a license, then > we will have to starve or get a Social Security number and go on > welfare. We wouldn't want to take what God gave us when we have > the opportunity to go to the State so the State can tell us how > to live when we receive benefits. Whose land is this, anyway, > and who claims ownership? Maybe this will give you some idea. > > "Socialist property in the USSR exists either in the form of > state property...." Art 5 Const. of the USSR. > > "The land, its mineral wealth, waters, forests, mills, facto- > ries, mines, rail, water and air transport, banks, communica- > tions, large state- organized agricultural enterprises (state > farms, machine and tractor stations, and the like), as well as > municipal enterprises and the bulk of the dwelling houses in the > cities and industrial localities, are state property, that is, > belong to the whole people." Art 6 Const. of the USSR. > > Are we operating on this for the good of the whole theory? > Speaking of the Federal Reserve Corporation that issues every > paper dollar (what ever that is) in circulation, where did Con- > gress get the idea to put the power to issue worthless paper as > money into the hands of a private corporation? > > "The economic foundation of the USSR is the socialist system > of economy...." Art 4 Const. of the USSR. > > "Administration of the banks...." Art 14(l) Const. of the > USSR. > > "Direction of the monetary and credit system." Art 14(n) > Const. of the USSR. > > But our government is able to grant farm loans (by which many > farmers have been thrown into default by a manipulating economy), > V.A. loans and housing loans to help our people. There is some- > thing good in that, isn't there?! > > "Contracting and granting loans." Art 14(p) Const. of the > USSR. > > Remember, one of the principle concepts of communism is consol- > idation of ownership of property in the hands of the State. What > better way than to lend money against property, manipulate the > economy into a blunder buss and foreclose the loans. Ask the > Veterans Administration and the Housing Administration how many > houses have been repossessed lately for resale. > > Ladies and gentlemen the list is so long it is becoming tedi- > ous, but, we have much to think about if we intend to secure a > future of liberty instead of communist slavery. Have we unknow- > ingly adopted communist doctrine and institutions domestically > while being distracted by communism abroad? How could we have > let this happen? No one could have devised a plan so subtle that > it could be implemented right under our very noses. But, some > one did a long time ago. > > Karl Marx, considered the father of communism, wrote his so- > called "Communist Manifesto." Most people think it was a plan to > implement communism in the USSR, but the truth is that it's a > plan to undermine free governments. It seems impossible, but > take a look and judge for yourself. > > To have a full understanding of how communism is nurtured to > flourish in America we must consult the Communist Manifesto. The > Communist Manifesto is a ten plank plan for reforming free gov- > ernments into communist governments. When all planks become a > fact in any given society, communism is fully in place. In other > words, the Communist Manifesto is a means to the end of spreading > communism throughout the world. > > Let us see how successfully communism is implemented in United > States law, government and society. > > PLANK NUMBER 1: Abolition of property in land and application > of all rents of land to public purposes. > > Ownership of land in the United States is, for the most part, > impossible today. How was this accomplished? Two methods are > employed to accomplish this end; usury and taxation, usury being > the main tool. Today, with exception of a few tracts of > land, all land is encumbered by debt. These debts bear interest, > payment of which is required, prior to any reduction of the > principal debt. The encumbrances last from 30 years to life and > beyond with most land passing to the heirs with the debt at- > tached. The interest enslaves the persons on the land to the > debt holder. If he is a bad slave, he forfeits his land to the > financial institution; if he is a good slave and produces suffi- > ciently to unjustly enrich the debt-holder by paying the inter- > est, he is allowed to remain on the land in debt slavery. > > Also, much of the land is heavily taxed as well. Since the > land is not owned and patented, but subject to debt which backs > debt notes (Federal Reserve Notes), and bank credit, it can be > taxed, and in many cases, is taxed heavily enough to cause the > land to be confiscated by the State for public purposes. As > well, because the land backs notes and credits that circulate as > public money, the land owner can be required to get building > permits, follow land use planning regulations, and even in some > cases, depending on the nature of the debt contract, be told what > crops to plant and how much of each crop to plant, if any. > > Thus, property (land), in truth, is non-existent because no one > has the control incident to full ownership. > > Examples of some of the agencies that have aided in making the > first plank of the Communist Manifesto reality in the United > States are: > > a. Farm and Home Loan Administration > b. Veterans Loan Administration > c. Federal Reserve Bank(s) > d. Banking institutions in general > e. Land Use Planning agencies > f. Federal Land Bank > > PLANK NUMBER 2: A heavy progressive and graduated income tax. > > The middle class has always been the strong-hold of a nation's > economy. When the economy is healthy, the people cannot be > coerced to change principles of government. > > It takes no genius to see that we have a heavy and progressive > income tax in the United States, and we all know that it impacts > the middle class above all people. Also, through exemptions, > allowances, deductions, credits and other manipulating devices, > the personal income tax is not only a tax but influences people > and business to control the economy to operate unnaturally. > > Finally, a progressive tax based on income makes it impossible > for the middle class individual to better his economic circum- > stances, unless he allows the taxing authority to control his > affairs. That is, unless he manipulates his affairs to give him > a tax break. > > As we all know, the principal agencies that impose and enforce > this Communist tax are: > > a. The Internal Revenue Service > b. The Social Security Administration > > c. All businesses that follow regulations of the IRS and SSA > and give information to them > d. And other agencies which assuredly are involved that are not > here mentioned. > > Robert W. Wangrud > BEHOLD! Newsletter > Fourth Judicial District > 522 Hartke Loop > Oregon City, Oregon > (503) 657-6207 > >"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better >than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask >not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. >May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were >our countrymen." - Samuel Adams." > >**************************************************************************** >Copy Rights secured to Robert W. Wangrud & Randy Geiszler. >All Rights reserved. behold@teleport.com >PLEASE NOTE THE NEW SITE - Home Page BEHOLD NEWSLETTER: >http://www.announce.com/behold/index.htm >**************************************************************************** > (8.8.5/8.7.5) with ESMTP id LAA07848 for <eagleflt@flash.net>; Sun, 16 Feb 1997 11:14:17 -0600 (CST) endeavor (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id LAA05574 for <eagleflt@flash.net>; Sun, 16 Feb 1997 11:10:31 -0600 (CST) [206.163.124.196]) by kim.teleport.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA18420; Sun, 16 Feb 1997 09:12:49 -0800 (PST) >Date: Sun, 16 Feb 1997 09:12:49 -0800 (PST) >To: eagleflt@flash.net >From: BEHOLD! Newsletter <behold@teleport.com> >Subject: USA OR USSR Part 2 >Cc: jh@teleport.com, > pact@juno.com (People Against Corruption & Tyranny) (People Against Corruption & Tyranny), > tbone@edge.net, winter@alaska.net, dalerobertson@hotmail.com > > Finally, a progressive tax based on income makes it impossible > for the middle class individual to better his economic circum- > stances, unless he allows the taxing authority to control his > affairs. That is, unless he manipulates his affairs to give him > a tax break. > > As we all know, the principal agencies that impose and enforce > this Communist tax are: > > a. The Internal Revenue Service > b. The Social Security Administration > c. All businesses that follow regulations of the IRS and SSA > and give information to them > d. And other agencies which assuredly are involved that are not > here mentioned. > > PLANK NUMBER 3: Abolition of all right of inheritance. > > The right of inheritance has not been abolished as a whole, > yet. But there are factors that have severely reduced the right > of inheritance in this generation. A contrived depression in > 1929, resulting from the creation of the Federal Reserve and its > money manipulations, placed a great deal of the middle class > wealth in the hands of the bankers, thereby depriving the subse- > quent generations of their inheritance. > > Through usury, (i.e., interest loans on property) most of > today's generations inherit more debt than anything else, and we > are again deprived. Probate and inheritance taxes reduce inheri- > tance substantially, as well. > > Finally, if there are any disputes as to who the lawful heirs > are, lawyers obtain a major portion of the inheritance in many > cases. From these factors and others which may exist, while the > right of inheritance has not yet been abolished, this right has > been greatly reduced to meet the ends of the third plank of the > Communist Manifesto. > > PLANK NUMBER 4: Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and > rebels. > > This plank is made manifest by means, that on the surface, > don't seem to be confiscatory. When immigrants come into the > United States and apply for citizenship, or even when they don't > or can't apply for citizenship, almost without fail they apply > for and get a Social Security number because without it they > cannot work. > > A person's membership in Social Security allows the heavy and > progressive income tax to be imposed on them to confiscate their > property. This is simply shown by the fact that a Social Securi- > ty number must be placed on all income tax forms filed with the > IRS. In fact, the form is invalid without this number. The > personal income tax is a tax for the privilege of citizenship. > As to confiscation of property of all rebels, who are con- > sidered rebels under the Communist Manifesto? Obviously, > those persons rebelling against communist proliferation and > ideals. We have already seen that a heavy and progressive > income tax is a communist ideal, so what happens to the > property of a person who fights against the income tax and > the IRS ? We have all seen the results in the national media. > The IRS issues a notice of lien, then levies property of the > person (as defined in the Social Security Act) considered to be > in rebellion. In most cases, the property is confiscated with- > out a trial or any due process known under the original United > States Constitution or its Bill of Rights. > > This may not be the only example of plank 4 in effect, but it > is certainly a very good example of its use in the United States > of America. > > PLANK NUMBER 5: Centralization of credit in the hands of the > State, by means of a national bank with State capital and an > exclusive monopoly. > > The Federal Reserve has been established as a central bank > which controls all issuance of money. The Federal Reserve is a > private and exclusive monopoly. Members of this monopoly are > allowed to create money at will and to monetize property to > increase their liquid reserves. Basically, this institution > controls all credit and in issuing credit, creates so-called > 'money' out of thin air by encumbering the property of the coun- > try which lies in usurious indebtedness. > > Because no labor or production created this so-called 'money' > (Federal Reserve Notes and Credits), inflation results due to the > larger medium of exchange without an increase in production of > material goods. This in turn helps to abolish ownership of > property and rights of inheritance which we readily see in our > day-to-day lives. > > This plank of the Communist Manifesto has been in place in the > United States for 70 years, dating back prior to the communist > take-over of Russia. > > I could go on to the other five planks, but instead, I will > only list them so that your mind will wonder, determine and think > of how, when and where the rest has been done. > > PLANK NUMBER 6: Centralization of the means of communication and > transport in the hands of the State. > > PLANK NUMBER 7: Extension of factories and instruments of produc- > tion owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste > lands, and improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a > common plan. > > PLANK NUMBER 8: Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of > industrial armies, especially for agriculture. > > PLANK NUMBER 9: Combination of agriculture with manufacturing > industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town > and country, by a more equitable distribution of the population > over the country. > > PLANK NUMBER 10: Free education for all children in public > schools.Abolition of child ren's factory labor in its present > form.Combination of education with industrial production, etc. > > > In conclusion, I believe that we have been so busy trying to > keep our heads above water in a manipulated economy, trying to > swim up that economic waterfall, that we have forgotten to take a > hard look at the source of the water. The television and the > newspapers reveal our loss of liberty to us every day, but be- > cause we've been desensitized to what liberty really is, we > cannot even see what we are losing. > > We have been convinced by a bunch of soothsayers that there is > a good reason for every license; permit; confiscation of proper- > ty; tax; war; police action; piece of legislation, etc., and all > in the name of public safety, health and welfare (the good of the > whole). All of this at the sacrifice of individual rights to the > extent that we are almost completely enslaved today. > > I ask you, when all individual liberty is gone, and it almost > is (watch for the road block on Christmas or New Years, and then > comes the day that they just leave them up), how will the whole > people fare as slaves? Remember, the easiest way to keep a man > in slavery is to let him think he is free. > > Out of which side of the mouth is government talking to you, > communist or Christian? Ask your favorite bureaucrat, and send > him a copy of this pamphlet. > > I implore you to find out what are the true principles of > liberty upon which this country was founded so that we don't lose > our liberty. One hint - you won't find it on television or in > the newspapers. > > If we are going to be card-carrying communists, we had better > admit it and stop spending billions of dollars in defense against > communism, to the destruction of our people. If we are going to > maintain the free Republic that our forefathers created, let's > spend what-ever it takes to push the destroyers of liberty out of > our governmental and economic institutions. I leave the ultimate > question to you - Are we not in fact, as members of Social Secu- > rity, card-carrying communists, living in the (USSA) United > Socialist States of America? > > I pray that our people come out of the Whore of this Babylonian > system before it's too late. "Come out my people, come out," is > the cry of our savior Jesus, the Christ! > > In the name of Jesus, the Christ, > our Lord and Savior > Randy L. Geiszler > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0 on Intel 80586 CPU web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail