Time: Mon Feb 17 12:43:47 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA12707;
Mon, 17 Feb 1997 08:48:04 -0700 (MST)
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 1997 12:35:04 -0800
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: USA OR USSR Part 1 [fwd]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>Date: Mon, 17 Feb 1997 07:08:38 -0800
>From: Douglas Walker <apta@discover.net>
>Organization: APTA
>To: snetnews <snetnews@world.std.com>
>Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: USA OR USSR Part 1]]
>
>The following was well thought out.
>--
>Doug
<snip>
> COMMUNISM IN AMERICA
> Do You Live in the U.S.S.A. (U.S.A.)?
>
>
> "This case involves a cancer in our body politic. It is a measure
> of the disease which afflicts us. Army surveillance, like Army
> regimentation, is at war with the principles of the First Amend-
> ment. Those who already walk submissively will say there is no
> cause for alarm. But submissiveness is not our heritage. The
> First Amendment was designed to allow rebellion to remain as our
> heritage. The Constitution was designed to keep the government
> off the backs of the people. The Bill of Rights was added to keep
> the precincts of belief and expression, of the press, of politi-
> cal and social activities free from surveillance. The Bill of
> Rights was designed to keep agents of government and official
> eavesdroppers away from assemblies of people. The aim was to
> allow men to be free and independent and to assert their rights
> against government. There can be no influence more paralyzing of
> that objective than Army surveillance. When an intelligence
> officer looks over every nonconformist's shoulder in the library,
> or walks invisibly by his side in a picket line, or infiltrates
> his club, the America once extolled as the voice of liberty heard
> around the world no longer is cast in the image which Jefferson
> and Madison designed, but more in the Russian image,..." Laird
> v. Tatum, 408 U.S. 1, p. 28 and 29.
>
> If you are a person who even remotely follows the national
> media, you probably understand that the major portion of the
> United States' defense spending is justified by the never ending
> cliche "We must prevent communism from spreading over the world."
> Ever since World War II there has been a so called 'cold war'
> against communism, as well as several police actions (i.e., Korea
> and Vietnam) based on the same ideal - the prevention of commu-
> nism abroad.
>
> The question posed here is, have the American people been so
> busy preventing communism abroad that they have failed to recog-
> nize it in their own governmental institutions? The shocked
> reader's first reaction, as was my own, is to deny any such thing
> could possibly have happened, and to stand, think and speak in
> defense of his beloved country. But what if it were true? What
> if your government has institutions in line with the communist
> plan; would you then be defending communism?
>
> I hold a love for my country as well as the next man, this is
> why I would fight the enemies of its original institutions no
> matter whether the enemy be a foreign government or domestic
> persons creating and establishing communist doctrine and institu-
> tions in our own government.
>
> Remember one thing, the easiest way to deter us from looking at
> communism in America is to make us believe that all communist
> enemies are in another country, no matter which country that
> might be, but never even hint that communism flourishes in the
> United States with little or no resistance.
>
> So let's take a serious look at what is happening to the insti-
> tutions of Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness, upon
> which this country's government was formed. Let us also take a
> look at how those institutions might be undermined before an
> unknowing people.
>
> "We the People" established a government for the protection
> of "ourselves and our posterity."
>
> "WE THE PEOPLE of the United States, in Order to form a more
> perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility,
> provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and
> secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity,
> do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States
> of America." Preamble of the United States Constitution, 1787.
>
> "We the People" were clearly one Nation, one race:
>
> "NATION -- 1. A body of people inhabiting the same country,
> or united under the same sovereign or government; - - -. Nation,
> as its etymology imports, originally denoted a family or race of
> men,- - -." An American Dictionary of the English Language, Noah
> Webster (1828), reprinted by Foundation for American Christian
> Education (1967).
>
> And, as stated in our Pledge of Allegiance, an 'indivisible'
> nation:
>
> "INDIVISIBLE -- That cannot be divided, separated or broken;
> not separable into parts. - - -." An American Dictionary of the
> English Language, Noah Webster (1828), reprinted by Foundation
> for American Christian Education (1967).
>
> It seems, then, that the fastest way to undermine a nation is
> to make it divisible - "A house divided cannot stand," (Abraham
> Lincoln). Lincoln knew this, and in perpetuating the Civil War,
> he destroyed the sovereignty of the posterity who formed this
> nation, turning the United States into an international body.
>
> In order to answer the initial question posed, we must first
> define what communism is so that we can readily recognize its
> elements at play.
>
> Let us first look at the institution of the largest communist
> block in the world, the USSR:
>
> "- - - The principle applied in the USSR is that of Social-
> ism: ..." Art. 12, Constitution of the Union of Soviet Socialist
> Republics (USSR), December 5, 1936 as amended.
>
> Webster's further defines communism as:
>
> "communism -- 1 b: a system or condition real or imagined in
> which goods are owned commonly rather than privately and are
> available as needed to each one in a unified group, sometimes
> inclusive, and often composed of members living and working
> together: - - - 2 a: a social and political doctrine or movement
> based upon revolutionary Marxian socialism that interprets histo-
> ry as a relentless class war eventually to result everywhere in
> the victory of the proletariat and the social ownership of the
> means of production with relative social and economic equality of
> all and ultimately to lead to a classless society b: BOLSHEVISM
> c: a totalitarian system of government in which the State as
> owner of the major industries and acting through the medium of a
> single authoritarian party controls in large measure the econom-
> ic, social and cultural life of the society." Webster's Third
> International Dictionary, 1966.
>
> We can see that the term "communism" denotes a sacrifice of all
> personal property and rights for the good of the whole number,
> based on the ideals of socialism, thus resulting in the destruc-
> tion of the individual character of man by consolidating that
> character into one artificial being, the State.
>
> The communist constitution claims a basis of 'socialism' for
> government.
>
> "socialism -- 2 a: a system or condition of society or group
> of living in which there is no private property b: a system
> or condition of society in which the means of production are
> owned and controlled by the State c: a stage of society that
> in Marxist theory is transitional between capitalism and commu-
> nism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and
> payments to individuals according to their work." Webster's
> Third World Dictionary, 1966.
>
> Now that we have a firm definition of what communism is, we
> will endeavor to make some comparisons between communism and
> institutions which have developed in the United States. To do
> this we will further reference the constitution of the USSR.
>
> I don't know if you have noticed, but the rights of the indi-
> vidual are becoming more and more restricted every day in the
> United States.
>
> For instance, the most basic rights of Life and Liberty depend
> upon a right we all hold very dear. The right to work. Try to
> get a job without a social security number, or ask your employer
> if you can work without one. I have seen enough evidence to know
> without a number, you will be deprived of the right to work.
>
> What kind of scheme is social security that it can have such a
> devastating affect on our lives? Black's Law Dictionary calls it
> 'social insurance'.
>
> Social Insurance. A comprehensive welfare plan established by
> law, generally compulsory in nature, and based on a program which
> spreads the cost of benefits among the entire population rather
> than on individual recipients. The federal government began to
> use insurance programs in 1935 with the passage of the Social
> Security Act. The basic federal and state approaches to social
> insurance presently in use are: Old Age, Survivors, and Disabili-
> ty Insurance (i.e. social security); Medicare and Medicaid;
> unemployment insurance; and worker's compensation. Black's Law
> Dict. 5Ed., p 724.
>
> Arthur J. Altmeyer, the author of the Social Security Act of
> 1935, in speaking of Social Security says:
>
> "- - - child's being issued an 'insurance policy' on the day
> he was born [is] to protect him against all major economic mis-
> fortunes which might befall him during his lifetime. This is the
> reason that he [Altmeyer] displayed some irritation when Lord
> Beveridge was hailed in 1942 as the originator of the idea of
> 'cradle to the grave' insurance when he made his famous report,
> 'Social Insurance and Allied Services'.
> "- - - - - Strangely enough, while throughout the rest of
> the world there is the tendency to use 'social security' in an
> expansive sense, we in this country are inclined to use it more
> restrictively as the synonym for only one form of social insur-
> ance, namely, our federal old age, survivors', and disability
> insurance system." The Formative Years of Social Security, by
> Arthur J. Altmeyer, p. 5.
>
> The Social Security Act itself says that it is social insur-
> ance:
>
> "Sec. 702. The Board shall perform the duties imposed upon
> it by this Act and shall also have the duty of studying and
> making recommendations as to the most effective methods of pro-
> viding economic security through social insurance, and as to
> legislation and matters of administrative policy concerning old-
> age pensions, unemployment compensation, accident compensation,
> and related subjects." Social Security Act, 49 STAT 620 at 636
> (1935).
>
> Further, this scheme requires mandatory contributions through
> FICA and the personal income tax. Where do these funds go? They
> are distributed to non-productive persons who have neglected to
> provide for their future security.
>
> What does the communist constitution provide for?
>
> "The jurisdiction of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics,
> as represented by its highest organs of state power and organs of
> state administration, embraces: (o) Organization of state insur-
> ance." Art 14, Const. of the USSR.
>
> And for what purpose ?
>
> "- - - provision of a wide network of sanatoria, rest
> homes...." Art 119, Const. of the USSR.
>
> "... right to maintenance in old age and also in case of
> sickness or disability. This right is ensured by the extensive
> development of social insurance...." Art 120, Const. of the USSR.
>
> The Social Security Act of 1935 provides for: (1) Disability
> compensation - Title V part 4; (2) Old age assistance and bene-
> fits - Title I and II; and, (3) Unemployment compensation - Title
> III. All of this in a comprehensive plan of social insurance
> that you are being compelled to join, or starve to death because
> no one will let you work without the Social Security number. Is
> this a protection of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness ?
>
> Just who's constitution was this plan formed under, that of the
> USA or that of the USSR?
>
> Let's make another comparison. Have you ever thought of teach-
> ing your children at home because you didn't like what they're
> thought in public school? The first thought that comes to most
> people's minds is that they will have their children taken away
> by the State because they aren't in school. In fact, this has
> happened many times in this country; you may have heard it in the
> news. Compulsory education is a good thing, right...?
>
> "... universal and compulsory education; by free education up
> to and including the seventh grade; . . ." Art 121, Const. of the
> USSR.
>
> The USSR thought so, but where did we get the idea ?
>
> How about letting women have the right to vote in a country
> founded upon family government (i.e., the head of the household
> casting the vote for the family)?
>
> "Women in the USSR are accorded equal rights with men in all
> spheres of economic, government, cultural, political and other
> public activity. - - -" Art 122, Const. of the USSR.
>
> "Women have the right to elect and be elected on equal terms
> with men." Art 137, Const. of the USSR.
>
> The family is supposed to be a singular unit. Throughout
> history, the male of the species has played the dominant roll.
> Okay, let's make men and women equal; but remember that a house
> divided will not stand. Look what this has done to the American
> family (e.g., the national divorce rate). Again, it seems that
> we have followed communist (anti-christ) doctrine in amending our
> constitution.
>
> "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not
> be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on
> account of sex." 19th Amendment to the U.S. Const.
>
> We have secret elections in the United States today. "The Life
> of John Marshall," by A.J. Beveridge, shows that originally
> elections weren't secret because your vote was cast out loud;
> this insured that the vote was properly recorded, plus everybody
> knew where his neighbor stood.
>
> Where do secret elections come from? You guessed it -
>
> "Voting at elections of deputies is secret." Art 140, Const.
> of the USSR.
>
> "- - - Deputies--are chosen by the electors on the basis of
> universal, equal and direct suffrage by secret ballot." Art 134,
> Const. of the USSR.
>
> In the counties in Oregon, and may other States, Deputy Dis-
> trict Attorneys are appointed, not elected, even when Oregon's
> constitution requires otherwise:
>
> "Prosecuting attorneys. There shall be elected by districts
> comprised of one, or more counties, a sufficient number of prose-
> cuting Attorneys, who shall be the law officers of the State, and
> of the counties within their respective districts, and shall
> perform such duties pertaining to the administration of Law, and
> general police as the Legislative Assembly may direct.--" Art VII
> (original) Sec 17, Oregon Constitution, 1857.
>
> But forget the Oregon Constitution; in Oregon the Constitution
> of the USSR supplies the proper method:
>
> "Area, district, and city procurators are appointed by the
> Procurators of the Union Republics,..." Art 116, Const. of the
> USSR.
>
> Note that deputy district attorney's in Oregon are appointed
> and not elected as per Oregon's Constitution, which says as many
> as needed shall be elected.
>
> But we are one of the most progressed nations in the world! We
> let anyone be a citizen regardless of race, color or creed and
> regardless of the Preamble of the United States Constitution
> which declares that the constitution was made for the protection
> of the posterity of the white race that formed it. That is what
> the Civil War was fought over. Unfortunately, not only did the
> South lose but the Constitution of the United States lost also.
>
> "Equality of rights of citizens of the USSR, irrespective of
> their nationality or race, in all spheres of economic, govern-
> ment, cultural, political and other public activity, is an inde-
> feasible law.
> "Any direct or indirect restriction of the rights of, or,
> conversely, the establishment of any direct or indirect privi-
> leges for, citizens on account of their race or nationality, as
> well as any advocacy of racial or national exclusiveness or
> hatred and contempt, is punishable by law." Art 123, Const. of
> the USSR.
>
> Now compare this to the first section of the Fourteenth Amend-
> ment:
>
> "Sec 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States,
> and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the
> United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State
> shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges
> or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any
> State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without
> due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdic-
> tion the equal protection of the laws." Fourteenth Amendment to
> the United States Constitution, 1868.
>
> "Sec. 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote
> shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any
> State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servi-
> tude." Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution,
> 1870.
>
> But we couldn't possibly affect the institutions of liberty,
> upon which our country was formed, by allowing millions of alien
> non-whites that previously lived under communist rule to come to
> our country, become citizens and a part of our government as
> officials - or could we?
>
> The Supreme Court appears to have ruled that anything from
> atheism to devil worship is a religion protected under the First
> Article of the Bill of Rights, when this country was founded by
> Christian men. Where did the Supreme court get this great idea?
>
> "... Freedom of religious worship and freedom of anti-reli-
> gious propaganda is recognized for all citizens." Art 124, Const.
> of the USSR.
>
> Could this be where the idea came from ?
>
> Let's take a look at our courts. I have been told, and ob-
> served (or heard) others being told, by judges, when they were
> using their rights as a defense, that the law says what it says
> and that the judges have to follow it regardless of rights or
> constitutional protections claimed by the party.
>
> "Judges are independent and subject only to the law." Art
> 112, Const. of the USSR.
>
> Bound only to the law? What happened to a man's rights, or did
> he give them up for the good of the whole?
>
> What about some of our other basic rights, like our right to
> travel? No, you don't have that right either!
>
> "481.095 Privilege of motorist to use highways. Subject to
> a compliance with the motor vehicle law of this state, owners and
> operators of motor vehicles are granted the privilege of using
> the highways of this state." ORS 481.095.
>
> Maybe the right to ownership of property, keeping in mind that
> the free use of it is part of ownership. What's the point of
> owning property if you can't use it whenever, and in the way, you
> want as long as you don't harm or endanger anyone while doing so.
>
> We can build a house, if we can get a "permit" (permission from
> the State). We can use our cars if we license ourselves first
> and then license, register and insure our cars, pass D.E.Q., and
> go once around the mulberry bush (sorry, once around the mulberry
> bush hasn't been added yet). We can install a wood stove, a
> furnace, wiring or remodel our homes, but not without permission
> (a permit).
>
> But if we are hungry, because we haven't been able to find work
> in an economy destroyed by the Federal Reserve Bank Corporation,
> we can go out and bring home a fish or game animal so we don't
> have to go on welfare. We had better not try it, or we'll be
> pinched for poaching if we didn't ask the State for the privilege
> (license-permit). If we don't have the money for a license, then
> we will have to starve or get a Social Security number and go on
> welfare. We wouldn't want to take what God gave us when we have
> the opportunity to go to the State so the State can tell us how
> to live when we receive benefits. Whose land is this, anyway,
> and who claims ownership? Maybe this will give you some idea.
>
> "Socialist property in the USSR exists either in the form of
> state property...." Art 5 Const. of the USSR.
>
> "The land, its mineral wealth, waters, forests, mills, facto-
> ries, mines, rail, water and air transport, banks, communica-
> tions, large state- organized agricultural enterprises (state
> farms, machine and tractor stations, and the like), as well as
> municipal enterprises and the bulk of the dwelling houses in the
> cities and industrial localities, are state property, that is,
> belong to the whole people." Art 6 Const. of the USSR.
>
> Are we operating on this for the good of the whole theory?
> Speaking of the Federal Reserve Corporation that issues every
> paper dollar (what ever that is) in circulation, where did Con-
> gress get the idea to put the power to issue worthless paper as
> money into the hands of a private corporation?
>
> "The economic foundation of the USSR is the socialist system
> of economy...." Art 4 Const. of the USSR.
>
> "Administration of the banks...." Art 14(l) Const. of the
> USSR.
>
> "Direction of the monetary and credit system." Art 14(n)
> Const. of the USSR.
>
> But our government is able to grant farm loans (by which many
> farmers have been thrown into default by a manipulating economy),
> V.A. loans and housing loans to help our people. There is some-
> thing good in that, isn't there?!
>
> "Contracting and granting loans." Art 14(p) Const. of the
> USSR.
>
> Remember, one of the principle concepts of communism is consol-
> idation of ownership of property in the hands of the State. What
> better way than to lend money against property, manipulate the
> economy into a blunder buss and foreclose the loans. Ask the
> Veterans Administration and the Housing Administration how many
> houses have been repossessed lately for resale.
>
> Ladies and gentlemen the list is so long it is becoming tedi-
> ous, but, we have much to think about if we intend to secure a
> future of liberty instead of communist slavery. Have we unknow-
> ingly adopted communist doctrine and institutions domestically
> while being distracted by communism abroad? How could we have
> let this happen? No one could have devised a plan so subtle that
> it could be implemented right under our very noses. But, some
> one did a long time ago.
>
> Karl Marx, considered the father of communism, wrote his so-
> called "Communist Manifesto." Most people think it was a plan to
> implement communism in the USSR, but the truth is that it's a
> plan to undermine free governments. It seems impossible, but
> take a look and judge for yourself.
>
> To have a full understanding of how communism is nurtured to
> flourish in America we must consult the Communist Manifesto. The
> Communist Manifesto is a ten plank plan for reforming free gov-
> ernments into communist governments. When all planks become a
> fact in any given society, communism is fully in place. In other
> words, the Communist Manifesto is a means to the end of spreading
> communism throughout the world.
>
> Let us see how successfully communism is implemented in United
> States law, government and society.
>
> PLANK NUMBER 1: Abolition of property in land and application
> of all rents of land to public purposes.
>
> Ownership of land in the United States is, for the most part,
> impossible today. How was this accomplished? Two methods are
> employed to accomplish this end; usury and taxation, usury being
> the main tool. Today, with exception of a few tracts of
> land, all land is encumbered by debt. These debts bear interest,
> payment of which is required, prior to any reduction of the
> principal debt. The encumbrances last from 30 years to life and
> beyond with most land passing to the heirs with the debt at-
> tached. The interest enslaves the persons on the land to the
> debt holder. If he is a bad slave, he forfeits his land to the
> financial institution; if he is a good slave and produces suffi-
> ciently to unjustly enrich the debt-holder by paying the inter-
> est, he is allowed to remain on the land in debt slavery.
>
> Also, much of the land is heavily taxed as well. Since the
> land is not owned and patented, but subject to debt which backs
> debt notes (Federal Reserve Notes), and bank credit, it can be
> taxed, and in many cases, is taxed heavily enough to cause the
> land to be confiscated by the State for public purposes. As
> well, because the land backs notes and credits that circulate as
> public money, the land owner can be required to get building
> permits, follow land use planning regulations, and even in some
> cases, depending on the nature of the debt contract, be told what
> crops to plant and how much of each crop to plant, if any.
>
> Thus, property (land), in truth, is non-existent because no one
> has the control incident to full ownership.
>
> Examples of some of the agencies that have aided in making the
> first plank of the Communist Manifesto reality in the United
> States are:
>
> a. Farm and Home Loan Administration
> b. Veterans Loan Administration
> c. Federal Reserve Bank(s)
> d. Banking institutions in general
> e. Land Use Planning agencies
> f. Federal Land Bank
>
> PLANK NUMBER 2: A heavy progressive and graduated income tax.
>
> The middle class has always been the strong-hold of a nation's
> economy. When the economy is healthy, the people cannot be
> coerced to change principles of government.
>
> It takes no genius to see that we have a heavy and progressive
> income tax in the United States, and we all know that it impacts
> the middle class above all people. Also, through exemptions,
> allowances, deductions, credits and other manipulating devices,
> the personal income tax is not only a tax but influences people
> and business to control the economy to operate unnaturally.
>
> Finally, a progressive tax based on income makes it impossible
> for the middle class individual to better his economic circum-
> stances, unless he allows the taxing authority to control his
> affairs. That is, unless he manipulates his affairs to give him
> a tax break.
>
> As we all know, the principal agencies that impose and enforce
> this Communist tax are:
>
> a. The Internal Revenue Service
> b. The Social Security Administration
>
> c. All businesses that follow regulations of the IRS and SSA
> and give information to them
> d. And other agencies which assuredly are involved that are not
> here mentioned.
>
> Robert W. Wangrud
> BEHOLD! Newsletter
> Fourth Judicial District
> 522 Hartke Loop
> Oregon City, Oregon
> (503) 657-6207
>
>"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better
>than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask
>not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you.
>May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were
>our countrymen." - Samuel Adams."
>
>****************************************************************************
>Copy Rights secured to Robert W. Wangrud & Randy Geiszler.
>All Rights reserved. behold@teleport.com
>PLEASE NOTE THE NEW SITE - Home Page BEHOLD NEWSLETTER:
>http://www.announce.com/behold/index.htm
>****************************************************************************
>
(8.8.5/8.7.5) with ESMTP id LAA07848 for <eagleflt@flash.net>; Sun, 16 Feb
1997 11:14:17 -0600 (CST)
endeavor (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id LAA05574 for <eagleflt@flash.net>;
Sun, 16 Feb 1997 11:10:31 -0600 (CST)
[206.163.124.196]) by kim.teleport.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA18420;
Sun, 16 Feb 1997 09:12:49 -0800 (PST)
>Date: Sun, 16 Feb 1997 09:12:49 -0800 (PST)
>To: eagleflt@flash.net
>From: BEHOLD! Newsletter <behold@teleport.com>
>Subject: USA OR USSR Part 2
>Cc: jh@teleport.com,
> pact@juno.com (People Against Corruption & Tyranny) (People
Against Corruption & Tyranny),
> tbone@edge.net, winter@alaska.net, dalerobertson@hotmail.com
>
> Finally, a progressive tax based on income makes it impossible
> for the middle class individual to better his economic circum-
> stances, unless he allows the taxing authority to control his
> affairs. That is, unless he manipulates his affairs to give him
> a tax break.
>
> As we all know, the principal agencies that impose and enforce
> this Communist tax are:
>
> a. The Internal Revenue Service
> b. The Social Security Administration
> c. All businesses that follow regulations of the IRS and SSA
> and give information to them
> d. And other agencies which assuredly are involved that are not
> here mentioned.
>
> PLANK NUMBER 3: Abolition of all right of inheritance.
>
> The right of inheritance has not been abolished as a whole,
> yet. But there are factors that have severely reduced the right
> of inheritance in this generation. A contrived depression in
> 1929, resulting from the creation of the Federal Reserve and its
> money manipulations, placed a great deal of the middle class
> wealth in the hands of the bankers, thereby depriving the subse-
> quent generations of their inheritance.
>
> Through usury, (i.e., interest loans on property) most of
> today's generations inherit more debt than anything else, and we
> are again deprived. Probate and inheritance taxes reduce inheri-
> tance substantially, as well.
>
> Finally, if there are any disputes as to who the lawful heirs
> are, lawyers obtain a major portion of the inheritance in many
> cases. From these factors and others which may exist, while the
> right of inheritance has not yet been abolished, this right has
> been greatly reduced to meet the ends of the third plank of the
> Communist Manifesto.
>
> PLANK NUMBER 4: Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and
> rebels.
>
> This plank is made manifest by means, that on the surface,
> don't seem to be confiscatory. When immigrants come into the
> United States and apply for citizenship, or even when they don't
> or can't apply for citizenship, almost without fail they apply
> for and get a Social Security number because without it they
> cannot work.
>
> A person's membership in Social Security allows the heavy and
> progressive income tax to be imposed on them to confiscate their
> property. This is simply shown by the fact that a Social Securi-
> ty number must be placed on all income tax forms filed with the
> IRS. In fact, the form is invalid without this number. The
> personal income tax is a tax for the privilege of citizenship.
> As to confiscation of property of all rebels, who are con-
> sidered rebels under the Communist Manifesto? Obviously,
> those persons rebelling against communist proliferation and
> ideals. We have already seen that a heavy and progressive
> income tax is a communist ideal, so what happens to the
> property of a person who fights against the income tax and
> the IRS ? We have all seen the results in the national media.
> The IRS issues a notice of lien, then levies property of the
> person (as defined in the Social Security Act) considered to be
> in rebellion. In most cases, the property is confiscated with-
> out a trial or any due process known under the original United
> States Constitution or its Bill of Rights.
>
> This may not be the only example of plank 4 in effect, but it
> is certainly a very good example of its use in the United States
> of America.
>
> PLANK NUMBER 5: Centralization of credit in the hands of the
> State, by means of a national bank with State capital and an
> exclusive monopoly.
>
> The Federal Reserve has been established as a central bank
> which controls all issuance of money. The Federal Reserve is a
> private and exclusive monopoly. Members of this monopoly are
> allowed to create money at will and to monetize property to
> increase their liquid reserves. Basically, this institution
> controls all credit and in issuing credit, creates so-called
> 'money' out of thin air by encumbering the property of the coun-
> try which lies in usurious indebtedness.
>
> Because no labor or production created this so-called 'money'
> (Federal Reserve Notes and Credits), inflation results due to the
> larger medium of exchange without an increase in production of
> material goods. This in turn helps to abolish ownership of
> property and rights of inheritance which we readily see in our
> day-to-day lives.
>
> This plank of the Communist Manifesto has been in place in the
> United States for 70 years, dating back prior to the communist
> take-over of Russia.
>
> I could go on to the other five planks, but instead, I will
> only list them so that your mind will wonder, determine and think
> of how, when and where the rest has been done.
>
> PLANK NUMBER 6: Centralization of the means of communication and
> transport in the hands of the State.
>
> PLANK NUMBER 7: Extension of factories and instruments of produc-
> tion owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste
> lands, and improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a
> common plan.
>
> PLANK NUMBER 8: Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of
> industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
>
> PLANK NUMBER 9: Combination of agriculture with manufacturing
> industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town
> and country, by a more equitable distribution of the population
> over the country.
>
> PLANK NUMBER 10: Free education for all children in public
> schools.Abolition of child ren's factory labor in its present
> form.Combination of education with industrial production, etc.
>
>
> In conclusion, I believe that we have been so busy trying to
> keep our heads above water in a manipulated economy, trying to
> swim up that economic waterfall, that we have forgotten to take a
> hard look at the source of the water. The television and the
> newspapers reveal our loss of liberty to us every day, but be-
> cause we've been desensitized to what liberty really is, we
> cannot even see what we are losing.
>
> We have been convinced by a bunch of soothsayers that there is
> a good reason for every license; permit; confiscation of proper-
> ty; tax; war; police action; piece of legislation, etc., and all
> in the name of public safety, health and welfare (the good of the
> whole). All of this at the sacrifice of individual rights to the
> extent that we are almost completely enslaved today.
>
> I ask you, when all individual liberty is gone, and it almost
> is (watch for the road block on Christmas or New Years, and then
> comes the day that they just leave them up), how will the whole
> people fare as slaves? Remember, the easiest way to keep a man
> in slavery is to let him think he is free.
>
> Out of which side of the mouth is government talking to you,
> communist or Christian? Ask your favorite bureaucrat, and send
> him a copy of this pamphlet.
>
> I implore you to find out what are the true principles of
> liberty upon which this country was founded so that we don't lose
> our liberty. One hint - you won't find it on television or in
> the newspapers.
>
> If we are going to be card-carrying communists, we had better
> admit it and stop spending billions of dollars in defense against
> communism, to the destruction of our people. If we are going to
> maintain the free Republic that our forefathers created, let's
> spend what-ever it takes to push the destroyers of liberty out of
> our governmental and economic institutions. I leave the ultimate
> question to you - Are we not in fact, as members of Social Secu-
> rity, card-carrying communists, living in the (USSA) United
> Socialist States of America?
>
> I pray that our people come out of the Whore of this Babylonian
> system before it's too late. "Come out my people, come out," is
> the cry of our savior Jesus, the Christ!
>
> In the name of Jesus, the Christ,
> our Lord and Savior
> Randy L. Geiszler
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness
email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0 on Intel 80586 CPU
web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail