Time: Sat Mar 01 05:49:43 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA09371; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 22:14:51 -0700 (MST) Date: Sat, 01 Mar 1997 05:47:25 -0800 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Thank you Cc: Patricia Neill <pnpj@db1.cc.rochester.edu> Dear Clients and Friends, Permit me to share a compliment with all of you. After the loss of my mother, and now a bad bout with viral influenza, this note from Patricia Neill really made my day. I wanted to share it with all of you. /s/ Paul Mitchell Dear Paul, Please feel free to use this letter however it can serve you best. I was pleased to write it as a small sign of support for your good work. All the best, Patricia Dear Patricia, Thank you very much for this long letter. May I have your permission to share your letter with clients of the Supreme Law School? /s/ Paul Mitchell At 12:37 PM 2/28/97 -0500, you wrote: >Dear Paul: > >Thank you for your prompt response. You are one lawyer whom the public >should praise highly. I for one feel very grateful that at least one lawyer >has the courage to pursue the impeachment of United States District Judge >John M. Roll who is personally responsible for over 112 felony violations. >You claim this Judge has accomplices and co-conspirators and is acting in >concert to violate 18 USC 242 and 241. In addition they are violating the >prohibition against obstruction of correspondence, jury tampering, >obstruction of justice, perjury of oath, barratry, and contempt of Court. > >You were skillful in countering Mr. Bauman, a high postal employee, who does >not well use his office when he defends a judge involved in corruption. > >I was also delighted in how you outmaneuvered US Dictrict Judge Charles C. >Lovell. You properly claimed by the nonsensical action of suing himself he >engaged in the practice of law, clearly a conflict of interest and in >violation of 28 USC 454(a). > >You have another obstacle with Court Clerks. Today alterations, fabrications >and omissions in recordings are considered part of a Clerk's job. I feel it >to be the duty of the people to assist an honest lawyer who is attempting to >restore order to a system that has become very corrupt. Some of us want to >Petition the House to conduct an investigation into routine corruption in >our Courts. We might even be able to obtain interest by House members in >matters of impeachment. > >Since members of the Bar are not always swarming to your side, you certainly >are deserving of our help. I too am in this for the long fight. Please keep >me informed of your brave and brilliant legal actions. I hold you in high >esteem. > >Most sincerely, > >Patricia Neill
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail