Time: Tue Mar 04 21:03:48 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA15062;
	Tue, 4 Mar 1997 16:38:02 -0700 (MST)
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 1997 20:50:27 -0800
To: Tip Killingsworth <tkill@ccci.org>
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Grand Jury case update -Reply 

Tip,

Thanks for your support and encouragement.
It means a lot to us, and to the American
People in general.

Simply, the grand jury subpoened records.
We wrote back and told them they could not
do that, and gave our reasons.  Our letter
never made it, however, even though it was sent
via Registered U.S. Mail, with return receipt
and restricted delivery requested.  We found
out later that the judge had intercepted the
letter, and handed it to the Assistant U.S.
Attorney on the case ("AUSA").

Upon discovering this, we sent the grand jury
a formal request that they investigate the judge 
and AUSA for obstruction of mail.  That request
never made it either, for the same reasons.
The judge even admitted it, on the record,
in a hearing.  The AUSA also admitted it,
on the record;  he even admitted opening
the letter.

After that, we put the grand jury on the list
of people who received all legal mail which
we generated in that case.  There have been
27 pleadings as of yesterday;  the consistent
pattern has been the same:  the judge and
AUSA intercepted ALL the mail.  

The judge even complained in one hearing that
he had 14 inches of pleadings to read in the case;  
we had only written 7 inches of pleadings!  
The other 7 inches were mailed to the grand jury, 
but were sitting on the judge's desk!!

So, we have been fighting back, in order to
prove that the judge and AUSA are involved in
a criminal conspiracy, involving numerous
violations of numerous federal laws.  Our 
pleadings, for example, contained affidavits,
prepared by some leading experts on tax law
in America.  If you want more background on
our findings, browse over to the Supreme Law
Library at URL:

  http://www.supremelaw.com

and read "The Kick-Back Racket."  This is a 
good place to begin, if you are new to this
subject matter.

If you like, I can provide you with a summary
of the legal issues which we developed in 
our 27 pleadings and 2 letters to the grand
jury.  To be perfectly honest, *I* am even
surprised at some of the materials we 
unearthed in that case.  The best way to
get access to these pleadings is to enroll
in the Supreme Law School ($10 per month,
declining for multiple months in advance).

Thanks again for your interest.

/s/ Paul Mitchell



At 07:11 PM 3/4/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Practically none of what I read makes any sense to me at all!  I'm glad you
>work at this and not me!  Keep at it and keep me posted.  I've understood
>enough to hope you nail this deadhead judge!
>Love ya,
>Tip
>Go Gators! Go Gator #45!
>
>>>> Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] 03/04/97 12:17pm >>>
>Tip,
>
>Thanks so much for your concern.
>Yesterday was a B-I-G deadline,
>because the USPS defaulted in the
>face of my demand for authority to
>obstruct correspondence to a federal
>grand jury.  Of course, there is no
>such authority.  Now, we get serious
>and start planning a full-blown 
>criminal complaint.  Thanks again!
>
>/s/ Paul Mitchell
><snip>


========================================================================
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.    : Counselor at Law, federal witness
email:       [address in tool bar]   : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU
web site:  http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this
========================================================================


      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail