Time: Tue Mar 04 21:03:48 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA15062; Tue, 4 Mar 1997 16:38:02 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 04 Mar 1997 20:50:27 -0800 To: Tip Killingsworth <tkill@ccci.org> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Grand Jury case update -Reply Tip, Thanks for your support and encouragement. It means a lot to us, and to the American People in general. Simply, the grand jury subpoened records. We wrote back and told them they could not do that, and gave our reasons. Our letter never made it, however, even though it was sent via Registered U.S. Mail, with return receipt and restricted delivery requested. We found out later that the judge had intercepted the letter, and handed it to the Assistant U.S. Attorney on the case ("AUSA"). Upon discovering this, we sent the grand jury a formal request that they investigate the judge and AUSA for obstruction of mail. That request never made it either, for the same reasons. The judge even admitted it, on the record, in a hearing. The AUSA also admitted it, on the record; he even admitted opening the letter. After that, we put the grand jury on the list of people who received all legal mail which we generated in that case. There have been 27 pleadings as of yesterday; the consistent pattern has been the same: the judge and AUSA intercepted ALL the mail. The judge even complained in one hearing that he had 14 inches of pleadings to read in the case; we had only written 7 inches of pleadings! The other 7 inches were mailed to the grand jury, but were sitting on the judge's desk!! So, we have been fighting back, in order to prove that the judge and AUSA are involved in a criminal conspiracy, involving numerous violations of numerous federal laws. Our pleadings, for example, contained affidavits, prepared by some leading experts on tax law in America. If you want more background on our findings, browse over to the Supreme Law Library at URL: http://www.supremelaw.com and read "The Kick-Back Racket." This is a good place to begin, if you are new to this subject matter. If you like, I can provide you with a summary of the legal issues which we developed in our 27 pleadings and 2 letters to the grand jury. To be perfectly honest, *I* am even surprised at some of the materials we unearthed in that case. The best way to get access to these pleadings is to enroll in the Supreme Law School ($10 per month, declining for multiple months in advance). Thanks again for your interest. /s/ Paul Mitchell At 07:11 PM 3/4/97 -0500, you wrote: >Practically none of what I read makes any sense to me at all! I'm glad you >work at this and not me! Keep at it and keep me posted. I've understood >enough to hope you nail this deadhead judge! >Love ya, >Tip >Go Gators! Go Gator #45! > >>>> Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] 03/04/97 12:17pm >>> >Tip, > >Thanks so much for your concern. >Yesterday was a B-I-G deadline, >because the USPS defaulted in the >face of my demand for authority to >obstruct correspondence to a federal >grand jury. Of course, there is no >such authority. Now, we get serious >and start planning a full-blown >criminal complaint. Thanks again! > >/s/ Paul Mitchell ><snip> ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail