Time: Sat Mar 08 19:44:50 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA04078;
	Sat, 8 Mar 1997 14:38:01 -0700 (MST)
Date: Sat, 08 Mar 1997 19:21:03 -0800
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Is this what we *really* want?  Why? (fwd)

>Date: Sat, 8 Mar 1997 16:04:58 -0500 (EST)
>To: fiedor19@eos.net
>From: Doug Fiedor <fiedor19@eos.net>
>Subject: Is this what we *really* want?  Why?
>
>Subject: Klinton's UN press conference question
>
>Here is the exact text of Klinton's response to the UN question posed on
>Friday (3/7/97), I got it from the White House web page...
>
>---------------------
>
> ...Let's take one from Sarah.  And then I've got to take 
>one from Jill Dougherty because she's about to go to Moscow and she 
>needs to have her parting shot.  Go ahead. 
>
>
>	     Q	  Sir, this is on another subject.  We have a very 
>great problem in this country today, and I wonder if you would use 
>your leadership to counteract the rumor-mongers that are abroad in 
>the land who are spreading all these rumors that are scaring people 
>to death -- large segments of our citizens believe that the United 
>Nations is taking over whole blocks of counties in Kentucky and 
>Tennessee.  
>
>	     THE PRESIDENT:  Yes. 
>
>	     Q	  And some of them, they believe that -- 
>
>	     THE PRESIDENT:  Now, you all are laughing, but -- 
>
>	     Q	  -- you're going to put us in a concentration camp 
>and you're going to give our army to Russia and all that baloney.  
>Could you do something about this?  Because it's hurting the unity of 
>the United States.
>
>	     THE PRESIDENT:  I don't know, because the people who 
>believe that think I'm the problem.  (Laughter.)  We're all laughing 
>about it, but there is a not insubstantial number of people who 
>believe that there is a plan out there for world domination and I'm 
>trying to give American sovereignty over to the U.N.  There was a --I 
>read in our local Arkansas newspaper, one of them the other day had a 
>letter to the editor saying that, there I go again, there's Clinton 
>out there trying to give American sovereignty over to the United 
>Nations.
>	     
>	     Let me just say this:  For people that are worried about 
>it, I would say, there is a serious issue here that every American 
>has to come to grips with, including Americans that don't much think 
>about foreign policy until some great problem occurs, and that is, 
>how can we be an independent, sovereign nation leading the world in a 
>world that is increasingly interdependent, that requires us to 
>cooperate with other people and then to deal with very difficult 
>circumstances in trying to determine how best to cooperate.  
>	     
>	     That's the issue that you will all be reporting on for 
>the next week in the Mexico certification issue.  Did I do the right 
>thing to certify Mexico?  Are the members of Congress who disagree 
>with me right when they say we should have decertified Mexico and 
>then give it a national interest waiver so we could continue to 
>cooperate economically and in others ways?
>	     
>	     I strongly believe I was right.  But we don't -- if you 
>want to go into that, we can later, but the issue is, we live in an 
>interdependent world.  We have to cooperate with people.  We're 
>better off when we do.  We're better off with NATO.  We're better off 
>with the United Nations.  We're better off when these countries can 
>work together.  So I just think for folks that are worried about this 
>out in the country, they need to be thinking about how -- we're not 
>going to give up our freedom, our independence, but we're not going 
>to go it alone into the 21st century either.  We're going to work 
>together and we have to. 
>	     
>	     Jill?
>	     
>	     Q	  Thank you very much, Mr. President.  Speaking of 
>Russia and NATO, yesterday we heard...
>
>-------
>
>Interesting.
>
>PFC Jeff S.
>Central Michigan Regional Militia,
>15th Brigade - Kent county
>
>Michigan Militia Corps Home Page: http://mmc.cns.net
>
>"...Stage III...would proceed to a point where no state would have the
>military power to challenge the progressively stregthened U.N. peace force
>...The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited...All other armaments
>would be destroyed..." -Department of State publication number 7277
>
>
>
>
>

========================================================================
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.    : Counselor at Law, federal witness
email:       [address in tool bar]   : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU
web site:  http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this
========================================================================


      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail