Time: Mon Mar 17 13:08:40 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA04101; Mon, 17 Mar 1997 10:49:18 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 13:05:40 -0800 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: A Win against IRS! (2 of 2) [This is part 2 of 2.] The Federal Zone: 27. This one section, all by itself, contains all the evidence you need, by words of construction, to prove that the term "United States" on either side of these sentences did not mean the 50 States united by and under the Constitution. If that is not conclusive to you, then see the following: 26 C.F.R. 31.3121(e)-1 State, United States, and citizen. (a) When used in the regulations in this subpart, the term "State" includes [in its restrictive form] the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Territories of Alaska and Hawaii before their admission as States, and (when used with respect to services performed after 1960) Guam and American Samoa. (b) When used in the regulations in this subpart, the term "United States", when used in a geographical sense, means the several states, (including the Territories of Alaska and Hawaii before their admission as States), the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands. When used in the regulations in this subpart with respect to services performed after 1960, the term "United States" also includes [in its expansive form] Guam and American Samoa when the term is used in a geographical sense. The term "citizen of the United States" includes [in its restrictive form] a citizen of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands, and, effective January 1, 1961, a citizen of Guam or American Samoa. [emphasis added] Please note the bolded terms. In paragraph (a), Alaska and Hawaii only fit the definition of "State" before joining the Union. That means the definition of "State" was never meant to be the 48 now 50 States of the Union unless distinctly expressed. If paragraph (b) confuses you, the following is submitted: 28. The word "geographical" was never used in tax law until Alaska and Hawaii joined the Union, and it is not defined in the Internal Revenue Code. So, we must use the definition found in the Standard Random House Dictionary: ge.o.graph.i.cal 1. of or pertaining to geography 2. of or pertaining to the natural features, population, industries, etc., of a region or regions 29. Were you born in the "United States"? The preposition "in" shows that the "United States" in this question is a place, a geographical place named "United States". It is singular, even though it ends in "s". It also can be plural when referring to the Union States which are places which exist by agreement. Page A - 14 of 26 Appendix A Every human in a nation is a natural Citizen of a place called a nation, if he was born in that nation. Those same people must be naturalized (born again) if they want to become a citizen of another nation. Original citizenship exists because of places, not agreements. This is jus soli, the law of the place of one's birth (see Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition). 30. Here are two questions, your own answers to which will solve the dilemma. In a geographical sense, where is the State of Texas located on the continent? In a geographical sense, where is the "United States" (Congress) located on the continent? 31. Now, since typewriters were purchased from the areas that just joined the Union, namely Alaska and Hawaii, according to Title 1, Congress had to use a term that is NOT used in the Internal Revenue Code, in order to buy the same typewriters from the same geographical area: Sec. 45. Title I of the Independent Offices Appropriation Act, 1960, is amended by striking out the words "for the purchase within the continental limits of the United States of any typewriting machines" and inserting in lieu thereof "for the purchase within the STATES OF THE UNION AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OF ANY TYPEWRITING MACHINES". [emphasis added] And, for declarations made under the penalties of perjury, the statute at 28 U.S.C. 1746 separately defines declarations made WITHIN and WITHOUT the "United States" as follows: If executed WITHOUT the United States: I declare ... under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. If executed WITHIN the United States, its territories, possessions, or commonwealths: I declare ... that the foregoing is true and correct. [emphasis added] The latter clause above is the penalty clause that is found on IRS Form 1040 and similar IRS forms. And, 28 U.S.C. 1603(a)(3) states as follows: (3) which is neither a citizen of a State of the United States as defined in section 1332(c) and (d) of this title .... Section 1332(d). The word "States", as used in this section, includes the Territories, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Page A - 15 of 26 The Federal Zone: Examples of Two Definitions of the term "United States" in 26 U.S.C. First Definition 32. 26 U.S.C. 7701(a)(9): (9) United States. -- The term "United States" when used in a geographical sense includes only the States and the District of Columbia. Second Definition 33. 26 U.S.C. 4612(a)(4)(A): (A) In general. -- The term "United States" means the 50 States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, any possession of the United States, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands. [emphasis added] 34. The Supreme Court stated in Hepburn & Dundas vs Ellsey, 6 U.S. 445, 2 Cranch 445, 2 L.Ed 332, that the District of Columbia is not a "State" within the meaning of the Constitution. Therefore, it is apparent that the meaning of the term "States" in the first definition above can only mean the territories and possessions belonging to the "United States", because of the specific mention of the District of Columbia and the specific absence of the 50 States (inclusio unius est exclusio alterius). The District of Columbia is not a "State" within the meaning of the Constitution (see Hepburn supra). Therefore, the 50 States are specifically excluded from this first definition of the term "United States". 35. Congress has no problem naming the "50 States" when it is legislating for them, so, in the second definition of the term "United States" above, Congress expressly mentions them, and there is no misunderstanding. If a statute in 26 U.S.C. does not have a special "word of art" definition for the term "United States", then the First Definition of the term "United States" is always used (see above) because of the general nature of that term as defined by Congress. 36. When citizens or residents of the first "United States" are without the geographical area of this first "United States", their "compensation for personal services actually rendered" is defined as "foreign earned income" in 26 U.S.C., Section 911(b) and 911(d)(2), as follows: Page A - 16 of 26 Appendix A 911(b) Foreign Earned Income. -- ... (d)(2) Earned Income. -- (A) In general. -- The term "earned income" means wages, salaries, or professional fees, and other amounts received as compensation for personal services actually rendered, but does not include that part of the compensation derived by the taxpayer for personal services rendered by him to a corporation which represents a distribution of earnings or profits rather than a reasonable allowance as compensation for the personal services actually rendered. 37. A citizen or resident of the first "United States" does not pay a tax on his "compensation for personal services actually rendered" while residing outside of the first "United States", because Congress has exempted all such compensation from taxation under 26 U.S.C., Section 911(a)(1), which reads as follows: 911(a) Exclusion from Gross Income. -- ... [T]here shall be excluded from the gross income of such individual, and exempt from taxation ... (1) the foreign earned income of such individual .... 38. When residing without (outside) this "United States", the citizen or resident of this "United States" pays no tax on "foreign earned income", but is required to file a return, claiming the exemption (see IRS Form 2555). 39. 26 C.F.R., Section 871-13(c) allows this citizen to abandon his citizenship or residence in the "United States" by residing elsewhere. 40. 26 C.F.R., Section 1.911-2(g) defines the term "United States" as follows: (g) United States. The term "United States" when used in a geographical sense includes any territory under the sovereignty of the United States. It includes the states4, [Puerto Rico, Guam, Mariana Islands, etc.] the District of Columbia, the possessions and territories of the United States, the territorial waters of the United States, the air space over the United States, and the seabed and subsoil of those submarine areas which are adjacent to the territorial waters of the United States and over which the United States has exclusive rights, in accordance with international law .... ____________________ 4. This term "state" evidently does not embrace one of the 50 States (where I am a free inhabitant), united by the Constitution, because they are separate governments or foreign states with respect to the "United States" (i.e. D.C., its territories, possessions and enclaves). Page A - 17 of 26 The Federal Zone: None of the 50 united States comes under the sovereignty of the "United States", and subsection (h) defines the 50 States united by the Constitution as "foreign countries": (h) Foreign country. The term "foreign country" when used in a geographical sense includes any territory under the sovereignty of a government other than that of the United States. [26 C.F.R. 1.911-2(h)] All of the 50 States are foreign with respect to each other and are under the sovereignty of their respective Legislatures, except where a power has been expressly delegated to Congress. The Citizens of each Union State are foreigners and aliens with respect to another Union State, unless they establish a residence therein under the laws of that Union State. Otherwise, they are nonresident aliens with respect to all the other Union States. 41. The regulations at 26 C.F.R., Section 1.1-1(a) state, in pertinent part: (a) General Rule. (1) Section 1 of the Code imposes an income tax on the income of every individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States and, to the extent provided by Section 871(b) or 877(b), on the income of a nonresident alien individual. 26 U.S.C., Section 1 imposes a tax on "taxable income" as follows, in pertinent part: There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of ... every married individual ... who makes a single return jointly with his spouse under section 6013 .... 42. The regulations promulgated to explain 26 U.S.C., Section 1 are found in 26 C.F.R., Section 1.1-1, and state in pertinent part: (a) General Rule. (1) Section 1 of the Code imposes an income tax on the income of every individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States and, to the extent provided by Section 871(b) or 877(b), on the income of a nonresident alien individual. Please note that the term "taxable income" is not used as such in the above statute because the "income" of those classes of individuals mentioned is taxable as "taxable income". Page A - 18 of 26 Appendix A Section 1.871 Classification and manner of taxing alien individuals (a) Classes of aliens. For purposes of the income tax, alien individuals are divided generally into two classes, namely, resident aliens and nonresident aliens. ... (b) Classes of nonresident aliens. -- (1) In general. For purposes of the income tax, nonresident alien individuals are divided into the following three classes: (i) Nonresident alien individuals who at no time during the taxable year are engaged in a trade or business in the United States, (ii) Nonresident alien individuals who at any time during the taxable year are, or are deemed under Section 1.871-9 to be, engaged in a trade or business in the United States, and (iii) NOT APPLICABLE (concerns residents of Puerto Rico) 43. 26 C.F.R., Section 871-13 states as follows: (a) In general. (1) An individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States at the beginning of the taxable year but a nonresident alien at the end of the taxable year, or a nonresident alien at the beginning of the taxable year but a citizen or resident of the United States at the end of the taxable year, is taxable for such year as though his taxable year were comprised of two separate periods, one consisting of the time during which he is a citizen or resident of the United States and the other consisting of the time during which he is not a citizen or resident of the United States. It sounds complicated, doesn't it? NONRESIDENT ALIEN 44. The federal income tax is a local tax for the "United States" to support local government and, in order to become liable to this tax, a State Citizen must be a resident therein (i.e. a resident alien), or receive income from sources therein, or be engaged in a trade or business therein. 45. In 26 U.S.C., Section 7701(b)(1)(A) & (B), Congress defined the statutory difference between "resident alien" and "nonresident alien" as follows: Page A - 19 of 26 The Federal Zone: (b) Definitions of Resident Alien and Nonresident Alien. -- (1) In general. -- For purposes of this title ... (A) Resident Alien. -- An alien individual shall be treated as a resident of the United States with respect to any calendar year if (and only if) such individual meets the requirements of clause (i), (ii), or (iii): (i) Lawfully admitted for permanent residence. -- Such individual is a lawful permanent resident of the United States at any time during such calendar year. (ii) Substantial presence. -- Such individual meets the substantial presence test of paragraph (3). (iii) First year election. -- Such individual makes the election provided in subparagraph (4). (B) Nonresident Alien. -- An individual is a nonresident alien if such individual is neither a citizen of the United States nor a resident of the United States (within the meaning of subparagraph (A)). 46. Plaintiffs are not "residents" (as that term is defined in the above statutes) nor are they citizens of this "United States". They are nonresident aliens as that term is defined in subsections (B) and (A)(i), (ii), and (iii), and they have the same status as the Plaintiff in Brushaber supra. INDIVIDUALS REQUIRED TO MAKE RETURNS OF INCOME 47. The following individuals are required to make returns of income: 26 C.F.R., Section 1.6012-1. Individuals required to make returns of income. (a) Individual citizen or resident. -- (1) In general. ... an income tax return must be filed by every individual ... if such individual is ... (i) A citizen of the United States, whether residing at home or abroad, (ii) A resident of the United States even though not a citizen thereof, or (iii) An alien bona fide resident of Puerto Rico during the entire taxable year. Page A - 20 of 26 Appendix A 48. John and Lois Knox clearly are not defined in the above statutes, but they are defined in the following statute as ones who are not required to make a return. 49. 26 C.F.R., Section 1.6013-1 states: (b) Nonresident Alien. A joint return shall not be made if either the husband or wife at any time during the taxable year is a nonresident alien. Mr. John H. Knox and Mrs. Lois C. Knox are nonresident aliens with respect to the "United States", with no income derived from sources within the "United States", except for John's Military Retirement pay, which is exempt from taxation. 50. 26 C.F.R., Section 871-7 states, in pertinent part, as follows: Except as otherwise provided in Section 1.871-12, a nonresident alien individual to whom this section applies is not subject to the tax imposed by section 1 or section 1201(b)5 but, pursuant to the provision of section 871(a), is liable to a flat tax of 30 percent upon the aggregate of the amounts determined under paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section which are received during the taxable year from sources within the United States. [emphasis added] 51. Please note 26 C.F.R., Section 1.871-4(b), Proof of residence of aliens, which establishes a key legal presumption: (b) Nonresidence presumed. An alien by reason of this alienage, is presumed to be a nonresident alien. 52. Further facts are illustrated by the definition of "withholding agent" at 26 U.S.C., Section 7701(a)(16): Withholding agent. -- The term "withholding agent" means any person required to deduct and withhold any tax under the provisions of section 1441, 1442, 1443, or 1461. 53. 26 U.S.C., Section 1441 refers to nonresident aliens who receive income from sources within the "United States", as set forth in Section 871(a)(1). The other sections do not apply to the Plaintiffs. 54. Your attention is invited to 26 C.F.R., Section 31.3401(a)(6)-1(b), which states as follows: ____________________ 5. Capital gains tax. Page A - 21 of 26 The Federal Zone: Remuneration for services performed outside the United States. Remuneration paid to a nonresident alien individual ... for services performed outside the United States is excepted from wages and hence is NOT SUBJECT TO WITHHOLDING. [emphasis added] 55. As a rule, Military Retirement Pay of a nonresident alien individual is exempted from the income tax at 26 C.F.R., Section 31.3401(a)-1(b)(1)(ii), with the following exception: Where such retirement pay or disability annuity ... is paid to a nonresident alien individual, withholding is required only in the case of such amounts paid to a nonresident alien individual who is a resident of Puerto Rico. and at 26 C.F.R., Section 935-1(a)(3): ... [F]or special rules for determining the residence for tax purposes of individuals under military or naval orders, see section 514 of the Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act of 19406, 50 App. U.S.C. 574. The residence of an individual, and, therefore, the jurisdiction with which he is required to file an income tax return under paragraph (b) of this section, may change from year to year. Section 574(1) of The Soldiers' and Sailors' Relief Act states that: For the purposes of taxation in respect of the personal property, income, or gross income of any such person by any State, Territory, possession, or political subdivision of any of the foregoing, or the District of Columbia, of which such person is not a resident or in which he is not domiciled ... personal property shall not be deemed to be located or present in or to have a situs for taxation in such State, Territory, possession or political subdivision, or district. [emphasis added] EXTRAORDINARY AND EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES 56. Plaintiffs herein are at an advanced age of 62 and both are in ill health, unable to work or to pay the tax or to sue for a refund. Lois has only one kidney which does not function properly; complicating this is a lung disease which prevents her from breathing. She has been totally disabled since 1981, with no earned income from any source since that time. John has emphysema and has difficulty breathing upon exercise. They are ____________________ 6. See Exhibit #6 attached hereto and made a part hereof. Page A - 22 of 26 Appendix A unable to pay the tax and sue for refund without the complete destruction of their home, which is combined with their business. The property which is the subject of this case is a one-of-a-kind property which is, or would be, irreplaceable years down the road, if a refund suit was won. The property has a value of $100,0007 and was allegedly sold for the sum of $16,000.00, which is all that could be recovered in a refund suit as pertains to said property. This creates an irreparable situation for Plaintiffs. The tax with penalties and interest claimed by the government against both Plaintiffs for 1982 is around $19,000.00 and, without the sale of the business property and home, it will be many years before a tax in this amount can be paid in full. Plaintiffs will not live long enough to prosecute such a suit. Equity and justice require some relief in such a situation. AUTHORITY FOR THE COURT TO ISSUE THE INJUNCTION 57. In Botta vs Scanlon, 288 F.2d 504 (2nd Circuit, 1961), the Court set forth the general exceptions to the bar at 26 U.S.C., Section 7421, stating (see EXHIBIT #7): "... [I]t has long been settled that this general prohibition is subject to exception in the case of an individual taxpayer against a particular collector where the tax is clearly illegal or other special circumstances of an unusual character make an appeal to equitable remedies appropriate." National Foundry Co. of N.Y. vs Director of Int. Rev., 2 Cir. 1956, 229 F.2d 149, 151. The Court then gave a number of examples, as follows: "(a) Suits to enjoin collection of taxes which are not due from the plaintiff but, in fact, are due from others. For example, see Raffaele vs Granger, 3 Cir. 1952, 196 F.2d 620, 622 .... "(b) Cases in which plaintiff definitely showed that the taxes sought to be collected were "probably" not validly due. For example, Midwest Haulers, Inc. vs Brady, 6 Cir. 1942, 128 F.2d 496, and John M. Hirst & Co. vs Gentsch, 6 Cir. 1943, 133 F.2d 247. "(c) Cases in which a penalty was involved. For example, Hill vs Wallace, 259 U.S. 44, 42 S.Ct 453, 66 L.Ed 822; Lipke vs Lederer, 259 U.S. 557, 42 S.Ct. 549, 66 L.Ed. 1061; Regal Drug Corporation vs Wardell, 260 U.S. 386, 43 S.Ct 152, 67 L.Ed 318; Allen vs Regents of the University System of Georgia, 304 U.S. 439, 58 S.Ct 980, 82 L.Ed 1448. ____________________ 7. The property had a value of $125,000 two years ago, when the IRS allegedly sold it. Page A - 23 of 26 The Federal Zone: "(d) Cases in which it was definitely demonstrated that it was not proper to levy the tax on the commodity in question, such as Miller vs Standard Nut Margarine Company of Florida, 284 U.S. 498, 52 S.Ct. 260, 76 L.Ed 422. "(e) Cases based upon tax assessment fraudulently obtained by the tax collector by coercion. For example, Mitsukiyo Yoshimura vs Alsup, 9 Cir. 1948, 167 F.2d 104" (141 F.Supp. at page 338). [4] In the present case, if any of the plaintiffs are not subject to any tax liability, such plaintiff might well be within the exception stated in 9 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, Section 49.213, Chapter 49, page 226, as follows: ... "[2] It is equally well setted [sic] that the Revenue laws relate only to taxpayers. No procedure is prescribed for a nontaxpayer where the Government seeks to levy on property belonging to him for the collection of another's tax, and no attempt has been made to annul the ordinary rights or remedies of a non-taxpayer in such cases. If the Government sought to levy on the property of A for a tax liability owing to B, A could not and would not be required to pay the tax under protest and then institute an action to recover the amount so paid. His remedy would be to go into a court of competent jurisdiction and enjoin the Government from proceeding against his property." In Tomlinson vs Smith, 7 Cir. 1942, 128 F.2d 808 ... the Court affirmed an order granting interlocutory injunction and noted the "distinction between suits instituted by taxpayers and non-taxpayers" (at page 811). CONCLUSION Plaintiffs are in no way subjected to any derivative liability. The procedures set forth in 26 C.F.R. do not authorize the Secretary or his delegate to manufacture income and tax it where a Person is without the taxable class. 26 C.F.R., Section 871 is unclouded in that, where there is no income from sources within the "United States" by a nonresident alien, the choice is delegated to that Person by Congress as to whether a return is to be filed or not (see 26 C.F.R. 1.871-8). Where the Secretary determines the existence of taxable income when there has been no return, he should sign the substitute return and assume the responsibility for the determination as required by 26 U.S.C. 6020(b)(1). Treasury Decision 2313 explains that the withholding agent is responsible for withholding the tax from sources within the "United States", for filing a Form 1040NR and for paying over the tax withheld from said nonresident alien. (See Treasury Decision 2313 and 26 C.F.R. 1.1461-3). Therefore, no penalties should accrue to the Plaintiffs. Lois K. Knox has no community property interest in John's Military Retirement Pay and, therefore, no taxable income accrues therefrom. Page A - 24 of 26 Appendix A The fact that the Knoxs were not aware of the above information from the early years of their lives and they reported the "earned income" from their labor in the foreign States of the Union as a local tax of the "United States", does not change their status as Citizens of the Republic of Union States. Nor does it change their status from nonresidents aliens to the "individuals" defined in 26 C.F.R., Section 1.1-1. Nor does it justify the Secretary's actions taken when he has been repeatedly informed by the Knoxs of their true status. The Secretary is required to know the law he is administering, and to do so with justice and equity within the parameters set forth by Congress. Arbitrary actions are discouraged by the Executive, the Congress and the Courts. PRAYER WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiffs pray that this Court grant a temporary and permanent injunction against the IRS, its employees, agents, Commissioner and Attorneys by ordering a cessation of the levies and seizures against all forms of property owned by Plaintiffs; that the Court order a return of property seized in the past, declare the sale of such property voidable or void, and order a release of all liens filed against the Plaintiffs. In the alternative, Plaintiffs request that this case be remanded back to the Administrative Agency for resolution and arbitration. Plaintiffs further request the Court to grant such other and further relief in law or in equity as Plaintiffs may be entitled. I declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, that the foregoing is true and correct, to the best of my knowledge and belief, per 28 U.S.C. 1746(1). Executed on this 5th day of September, 1991. Respectfully submitted, /s/ John H. Knox Page A - 25 of 26 The Federal Zone: [addendum to Knox brief] CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED in the SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE of the STATE OF INDIANA at Indianapolis, November Term, 1878, in the Sixty-Third Year of the State. -----+----- Daly et al. vs The National Life Insurance Company of the United States of America. [cite omitted] "Foreign Corporation" Defined. -- The statutes of this State define a foreign corporation to be "a corporation created by or under the laws of any other state, government, or country," or one "not incorporated or organized in this State". Same. -- Insurance Company Created by Act of Congress. -- An insurance company created by an act of Congress is a foreign corporation subject to the requirements of the statute of this State approved June 17th, 1852, "respecting foreign corporations and their agents in this State." 1 R.S. 1876, p. 373. Same. -- Congress as a Local Legislature. -- Constitutional Law. -- An act of Congress creating a private corporation is the act of Congress as the local Legislature of the District of Columbia; as Congress can not, under the federal constitution, as the Congress of the United States, create a private corporation. # # # Page A - 26 of 26 ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail