Time: Sat Mar 22 02:48:20 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA11154; Sat, 22 Mar 1997 20:24:14 -0700 (MST) by usr08.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA21842; Sat, 22 Mar 1997 20:23:46 -0700 (MST) Date: Sat, 22 Mar 1997 02:47:37 -0800 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: NSSC- Urgent Action re: Red China (fwd) <snip> >>To: uwsa@uwsa.com >>From: Nick Ivanovich <nssc@inlink.com> >>Subject: NSSC- Urgent Action RE: Red China >> >> NATIONAL STATE SOVEREIGNTY COALITION >> "Information & Action....Of, By and For the People" >>Doc. 131 ** Urgent Action Alert RE: Red China ** 3/22/97 Pg 1 of 2 >> >>OUTRAGE is growing as Americans realize the extent of U.S. >>government corruption. News revelations this week bring grave >>concerns over illegal campaign funding contributions made to the >>White House, the Democratic National Committee, and certain >>members of Congress by foreign corporations fronting for the >>Communist Government of China. >> Results of Washington's cesspool of deal-making have started to >>surface. Americans learned of Clinton's trip to Long Beach, Calif., last >>September to secure the lease of the entire Naval base there to >>COSCO, a container shipping company, and front for the Communist >>Government of China. Unbelievable, that Clinton would invite to our >>shores the government that murdered thousands of Freedom seeking >>Chinese students in Tienamen Square in 1989. >> Last year a COSCO ship was intercepted by the FBI in an attempt >>to smuggle a load AK-47s into Oakland, CA. Days ago two large >>containers of Chinese weapons were confiscated in Calif. while on route >>to Mexico, and identified as having come through the port of Long >>Beach. >> The Washington Times reported that Red China has acquired >>control of two major ports, one at the Atlantic, and one at the Pacific >>entrances to the Panama Canal. This breach of the Monroe Doctrine >>was lauded by the global business community as a tactical success of >>our 'trading partner" the Chinese. Where is the concern for U.S. >>Sovereignty, our National Security and our ability to bring ships and >>equipment through the Panama canal during times of international >>crisis? >> >>WHERE ARE OUR LEADERS? >>Washington Times reports, March 21, Vice President AL GORE and >>Speaker NEWT GINGRICH are GOING TO CHINA. Apparently more >>concerned about trade, and prepared to ignore the outrage boiling in >>the U.S., Al Gore is going to China to improve U.S.-Chinese relations. >>Gingrich, who leaves Sunday on his own Asian tour, said, "I certainly >>am opposed to any foreign government being involved in any >>systematic effort to corrupt or undermine our system... but I don't think >>we should have large shifts in our relations overseas, based on >>whatever this month's story of the week is, or month is." The truth is >>these "representatives" of the people place International trade and >>global deal making over U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY! >> >>REP. DUNCAN HUNTER TAKES ACTION. He and Rep. Duke >>Cunningham R-CA, have requested a national security review of the >>Long Beach port lease to COSCO Rep. Hunter has introduced: >>HR1138 a bill "To prohibit the conveyance, directly or indirectly, of >>property at Naval Station, Long Beach California, to a commercial >>shipping company owned or controlled by a foreign country." and he >>URGENTLY needs our IMMEDIATE SUPPORT!!! >> >>Call YOUR REPS., INSIST THAT THEY SUPPORT HR-1138 >> 1-800-972-3524. >>We MUST DELUGE CONGRESS, fighting with everything we've got >>for passage of the Hunter Bill... We don't have a lot of time... Make >>copies of this alert. Pass them out to friends and co-workers. Ask >>them to call and write their Reps. and send a copy of the following >>letter to their members of Congress. Write at the top, "I AGREE WITH >>THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN"... Sign your name and >>address and get others to sign as well. Mail or Fax it ASAP. >> >>Page 2. >> >>AN OPEN LETTER TO EDITOR(S)...AND CONGRESS: >> CITIZEN OVERSIGHT DENIED... >> THE COSCO (RED CHINA) / LONG BEACH CAPER >> By Susan E. Madori (619) 440-5237 Ph (619) 440-6524 Fax >> >> Under Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, "The Congress >>shall have Power To... regulate Commerce with foreign >>Nations..."...and under Article I, Section 10 "No State shall, without the >>Consent of Congress...enter into any Agreement or Compact with >>another State, or with a foreign Power..." Clearly, it is unconstitutional >>for our military, governmental agencies, cities, municipalities, >>corporations and citizens to regulate trade or enter into sales/lease >>Agreements with foreign powers involving U.S. properties or >>facilities...WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CONGRESS! >> >>And while it is blatantly obvious President Clinton violated his Oath of >>Office to PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION >>-- by twice meeting with the Long Beach Port Authority and City Mayor, >>using the power and influence of his oval office to seduce and incite >>elected municipal officials...and their appointees... TO CIRCUMVENT >>CONGRESS AND VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION by entering into an >>extended/expanded Port Lease with COSCO (Red China) -- >>Congressional implication in the Long Beach caper is just as >>chilling...yet ingeniously subtle... BECAUSE CONGRESS SIMPLY >>DOES NOTHING! >> >> Constitutionally, Congress must act by VOTE. And it is only by >>WITNESSING CONGRESSIONAL DEBATES AND VOTES that the >>American people can become informed...and have an opportunity to >>respond...IN ADVANCE...on matters which may adversely affect us or >>our national sovereignty and security. Thus, when Congress FAILS TO >>VOTE on matters of significance... THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE >>DELIBERATELY DECEIVED. >> >> When Congress FAILS TO VOTE it abdicates it's Constitutional >>responsibility to perform it's duties, but more importantly, we the people >>are denied OUR Congressional oversight. Such is the case when >>proposed "laws" unconstitutionally originate in the Executive rather >>than Legislative Branch of Government, in the form of Executive Orders >>or Presidential Proclamations... WITHOUT PUBLICITY...requiring only >>INACTION (OR NO VOTE) by Congress for PASSAGE. (President >>Clinton ...AND CONGRESS BY ACQUIESCENCE...have passed more >>than 200 such Executive Orders during his presidential term in office, >>and few of these have ever seen the public-light-of-day.) >> >> Such is also the case when Congress FAILED TO VOTE on the >>original COSCO (China)/ Long Beach Naval Base Lease, entered into >>15 years ago...or the current, proposed Long Beach Port Authority's >>extended/expanded Lease with COSCO. And Congress also FAILED >>TO VOTE...in 1996...on the permanent Lease to Germany of Holloman >>Air Force Base in Alamogordo, New Mexico. Just how many other >>unconstitutional sales/lease negotiations with foreign powers for U.S. >>properties...have been...are now...or will be...allowed to take place >>without Congressional oversight, intervention, OR VOTE?? >>EVERY TIME A LAW, RULE OR REGULATION IS >>PASSED...AND CONGRESS FAILS TO VOTE...WE >>BECOME A DANGEROUSLY UNINFORMED PUBLIC! >> >>NSSC PO Box 29106 - St. Louis, MO 63126 V 314-843-3457, Fx >>314-843-3771, Email nssc@inlink.com For more Information: >>http://ai2a.net/~ldelclef/nssc/index.htm >> >> >> > > > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail