Time: Fri Mar 28 02:59:24 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA15270; Fri, 28 Mar 1997 19:11:55 -0700 (MST) by usr08.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA18364; Fri, 28 Mar 1997 19:11:50 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 28 Mar 1997 00:44:28 -0800 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: SNET: Clinton - COSCO - Hammer? (fwd) <snip> >-> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List > >Got some real juicy prime cuts today... > >Been getting much good info and intel recently from variety of >very credible sources. I have not completed my own investigation >to verify all details of the following items, but feel the source >is solid enough to pass along before it gets buried on my desk. >Would be happy to hear from anyone with PERSONAL knowledge >(verifiable) or PROOF (send me the docs, or tell where to find) >on these subjects (don't tell me anything about what a friend or >relative said PLEASE!) to confirm or disprove veracity. > > >CLINTON'S KNEE...WAS IT A NINE IRON? > >Have heard some very interesting accounts about how Clinton >really hurt his knee. While they are slightly different, they >confirm his parting from "friend" Greg Norman's home was less >than amicable. > >According to one account, the Secret Service agents who were >outside the house that night heard Greg Norman and Clinton >having a fight. > >A few moments later the door flew open and Clinton came flying >out to land on the ground. Norman reportedly was then heard to >yell something about getting this mooching free-loader off his >property. > >According to another account, Clinton may have attempted some >liberties not usual for a house guest with the hostess. In this >version Norman kneecapped Clinton with a nine iron before he >ejected the President. > >This just might explain why Norman did not go to the hospital >with Clinton. > >I don't suppose we will ever know the precise events, Norman >isn't saying, and Clinton may not have been in a condition to >remember. > >This was provided by a source I have reason to believe is very >reliable in such matters. Also a couple of doctors have confirmed >that it is highly unlikely for the injury to have occurred >as described in the press. > > >DIANNE FEINSTEIN: THE QUEEN OF DENIAL > >I hear that the infamous anti-gun legislator Diane Feinstein's >husband is a paid lobbyist for COSCO. > >That's right, the same senator that is sponsoring legislation >that would make available all of our former military bases as >prisons, the same senator who was named as a ranking member of >the Subcommittee on Technology, Government Information, and >Terrorism, the same senator who holds committee and sub-committee >memberships on East Asian and Pacific Affairs (Can you say: >"Conflict of Interest"). > >Yes the same senator who holds sub-committee membership on Youth >Violence, has a spouse who is assisting a communist Chinese company, >with ties to the highest party cadres, that is implicated in the >massive smuggling of AK-47's into this country. > >Of course it makes sense that she would be the sponsor of >legislation to ban the very guns that her husband is helping the >Chinese to smuggle in...? Although it might help drive up the >price...... > >Let's take a closer look: > >She has also been instrumental in creating a 3 million acre >wilderness preserve, that includes some interesting areas. She >introduced legislation that ups the penalties on uppers. Well I >guess we wouldn't want those big military bases sitting there empty >waiting for prisoners very long, would we? > >We have just started looking, but we are seeing an interesting >pattern of certain things about this woman, that we do NOT like the >look of. Oh by the way, do you remember how she got her first big >break in politics? That's right, two people were murdered so she was >moved up to Mayor of San Francisco. > >Something stinks here and it is not Fisherman's Wharf. > >I know I've mentioned it before, but if some of you are still >scratching your heads, I will give you a hint: In each of the recent >bank robberies involving shoot ups in the street guaranteed to draw >maximum attention, the press reports have mentioned the presence of >AK-47's. There is MUCH more I could say on that subject, but I'll >hold it for a slow news day... if we ever have one again. > >Can't resist one more shot at this: Do you get the same kind of >deja vu feeling I do about how this smacks (sorry for the pun) of the >way the CIA addresses drug smuggling? > >First you instigate the trade, then take a hefty cut, bring in >billions of dollars worth to the US, destroy millions of lives, use >the profits for other illegal activities, scream about locking up the >dealers and throwing away the key, and then retire on a nice pension, >while some poor black guy does 30 years without parole for selling a >couple of bucks worth to one of the thousands of undercover agents >recently hired to deal with the plague. Oh yea, almost forgot, you also >have to raise taxes to pay for the new larger prisons to hold all >the political, er, I mean hard-core criminals. > >Historical Note: In 1960, 20,000 people in this country were arrested >on drug charges. Last year the number was over 1,000,000 people. > >Economic Note: It all works out, the cost of processing those people >at somewhere around $30 Billion of your tax dollars was roughly equal >to the cost of the CIA's budget. When you figure in how much the CIA >made off of those drugs for other illegal activities, it goes to prove >that government can be just as efficient as private industry, so stop >slamming our spooks, they are the only branch of government that >produces a profit. > >Last but not least: > >ARMAND (sickle) HAMMER: GONE BUT NOT FORGOTTEN > >Was told that pursuing the next piece of information could be >very hazardous to my health. So I decided to get lots of people >working on it, as there is safety in numbers. And my quota of >death threats has been filled for the month. So... > >What I hear is that there is much more than meets the eye with >Foundations, etc., set up by Hammer prior to his death. And that >the true dollars involved are absolutely staggering. (Info/docs I >have on this now show considerably less, but this particular lead I >trust for reasons I won't go into.) > >Furthermore.....ARE YOU READY?! > >To really follow this trail all the way could be almost like the >Holy Grail of tracing sources and people behind the scenes. I may be >overstating what I heard but don't think by much. It also fits with >other pieces of the puzzle that have been falling into place. > >Now I am not going to go over everything here, but for those >who are unaware of Armand Hammer's history and career, it is an >incredible story. Suffice it to say he was an agent of Moscow >(and the British Crown?!) and was accorded very unusual privileges >to trade (and get repeatedly bailed out) with the Soviet >Socialist Republic. > >And for the last few of today's clues: What boring stiff of a >Vice President had a father who was in Hammer's employ for many >years? What Whitewater prosecutor also indirectly received >something of the largess of this industry magnate who, by all >accounts, was more of a failure than a success the majority of the >time, and yet continually grew wealthier? What university got >Hammer's incredibly valuable art collection? And is there some >really good reason that they only let small privileged numbers in >to view all of these priceless works? > >Hope this doesn't keep you awake at night wondering, and don't >come crawling to me looking for all the answers. Let's all do a >little digging and maybe we will find the truth. For anyone in >California where Hammer's will was probated, and foundations >and trusts set up, you are in a better position to follow up on >this, so please help us out. > >Happy Hunting! > >Keith Andrew Kovacs > >DAWN, Inc. >17218 Wildwood Rd. >Jupiter, FL 33478 >561-746-1585 > >-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com >-> Posted by: dawn1@evcom.net > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail