Time: Sat Mar 29 20:40:02 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA27507; Sat, 29 Mar 1997 17:00:37 -0700 (MST) by usr01.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA19649; Sat, 29 Mar 1997 17:00:30 -0700 (MST) Date: Sat, 29 Mar 1997 20:26:56 -0800 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: [TL] WHAT IS MONEY? [1/2] <snip> > >>Greetings to All, >> >>Just what is money, anyway? >> >> MONEY >> >>1. A promissory note is a written promise by >> one person to pay to another or to bearer >> a fixed sum of money. >> See: >> Davis v. Spencer, 267 Ill >> 57; 107 NE 826; >> Jencks v. Rice, 119 Iowa 451; >> Cherry v. Sprague, 187 Mass 113. >> >>2. As a decree by a court of the U.S. for >> the payment of money can be made only for >> the payment of so many dollars of some >> specie of money that is made lawful money >> by a statute of the U.S., it follows that >> a recovery upon such a promissory note or >> contract must be for some dollars in gold >> and silver coins. >> See: >> The Edith, D.C. N.Y. (1875), 5 Ben. >> 144, 8 Fed. Cases 4,281; >> Forbes v. Murray, D.C. N.Y. (1869), >> 3 Ben. 497, 9 Fed. Cases 4,928. >> >>3. The general rule is that a final judgment >> for money must specify the amount >> awarded. >> See: >> U.S. v. F. & M. Shaefer Brewing, 356 >> US 227; >> 45 Am Jur 2d 81. >> >>4. An act by the legislature of Alabama, >> September 30, 1920, page 36, providing >> when a check is presented or forwarded to >> the payee bank for payment, it may at its >> option pay or remit the same in money or >> in exchange drawn on its reserves. >> However, it is unconstitutional and void >> as an attempt by the state to make a >> class of debts payable at the option of >> the debtor in something other than gold >> and silver coin. >> See: >> Capitol Grain and Feed Co v. Federal >> Reserve Bank of Atlanta, D.C. Ga. >> (1925), 3 F.2d 614, 269 US 589, 70 >> L Ed 427. >> >>5. As bills of credit were entirely >> abolished, the paper money of the state >> banks was the only currency or >> circulating medium to which the >> prohibition (Art. 1, Sec. 10) could have >> had any application. >> See: >> Veazie Bank v. Fenno, 75 US 533. >> (What is checkbook credit, lines of >> credit, etc?) >> >>6. Congress was vested with the power to >> borrow money and that the promise of >> payment having been given, no authority >> remained to alter or destroy the original >> promise. >> See: >> Perry v. U.S., 294 US 330. >> >>7. The states are not forbidden to issue >> coupons receivable for taxes, nor execute >> instruments binding themselves to pay >> money at a future day for services >> rendered or money borrowed. >> See: >> Poindexter v. Greenbow, 114 US 70; >> Chaffin v. Taylor, 116 US 567; >> Houston & Texas Central R.R. v. >> Texas, 177 US 66. (If this is true, >> then why do states borrow from >> banks? States issue bonds and the >> banks buy the bonds by creating a >> new demand deposit and nothing is >> deposited. When it comes time to >> pay the bonds, the state acts as a >> collection agent for the bank.) >> >>8. Neither the president nor the cashier of >> a bank has a right to accept anything but >> money in payment of an obligation due the >> bank. >> See: >> Aliquippa National Bank v. Harvey, >> 12 A.2d 409, 340 Pa 223; >> First National Bank of Mt. Holley >> Springs v. Cumbler, 21 A.2d 120; >> Re Bowen 46 F.Supp 631, 16 A.2d 409. >> >>9. "Some years ago a new type of installment >> credit appeared in banks throughout the >> country. It became known as check credit >> or revolving check credit. Basically, it >> provided that those eligible for such >> credit be granted a line of credit in the >> agreed amount. In order to use that line, >> the borrower needed merely to write >> checks. The checks were special checks, >> and were NOT actually checking accounts. >> The check was merely the instrument by >> which the loan account was activated. >> Usually it did not go through all the >> processes that an ORDINARY check does >> once it reaches the bank. However, it had >> the APPEARANCE of an ORDINARY check, and >> was so used by the customer and the >> person to whom he gave the check." >> Source: "The Bankers Handbook" (? >> edition), page 530. (Does the bank >> disclose this information to you? It >> should be quite important for you to know >> that the bank just created a bookkeeping >> entry to create the "loan", and that the >> checks were not actually checks, but had >> the appearance of checks. This is what is >> known as a common law cheat and should be >> in violation of Fair Trade Practices >> because it gives banks a much greater >> advantage in business than you or I, or >> other businesses.) >> See: >> Title 15, Sec. 1635 of Chap. 41. >> >>10. Unless there is what the law considers a >> valuable consideration, it will not be >> sufficient to maintain an action. And >> there is a distinction between a valuable >> consideration, other than money, and a >> money consideration. While in the >> "former" case the slightest consideration >> will support a promise (consideration >> other than money) to pay the largest >> amount to the full extent of the promise, >> in the latter the consideration will >> support a promise only to the extent of >> the money forming the consideration. The >> law leaves the measure of a valuable >> consideration other than money, for a >> promise to pay, to the parties to the >> contract; but money being the standard of >> value, is not the subject to be changed >> by contract, and will support a promise >> to pay money only to the extent of the >> amount of the consideration. >> See: >> Sawyer v. McLouth, 46 Barb 350. >> >>11. The term "tender" as used in the books, >> denotes a legal OFFER, one which one >> party is under obligation to make and the >> other bound to accept. >> See: >> Duluth v. Knowlton, 42 Minn. 229; >> Patnote v. Sanders, 41 Vt. 66. >> >>12. The promissory note, even when payable on >> demand and fully secured, is still, as >> its name implies, only a PROMISE to pay, >> and does not represent the paying out or >> reduction of assets. >> See: >> Don E. Williams Co. v. Commissioner >> of IRS, 51 L.Ed. 2d 48 (Feb. 22, >> 1977). >> >>13. Money does not embrace notes (promises to >> pay money). >> See: >> Lane v. Railey; >> U.S. v. Wells; >> Devenny v. Devenny; >> State v. Hoke; >> Hamilton v. State; etc.. (Since a >> Federal Reserve Note is not even a >> note [a promise to pay], money >> cannot embrace a Federal Reserve >> note.) >> >>14. An agent (clerk) has no implied authority >> to receive anything else than MONEY in >> satisfaction of a debt due his principal. >> He cannot, therefore, take payment in a >> check. >> See: >> Hall v. Storrs, 7 Wis. 217; >> Buckwalter v. Craig, 55 Mo. 71. >> >>15. Payment of debts is >> imperative/axiomatic/essential for the >> right of contract/property to exist, for >> without payment (delivery of money), the >> debt still exists. >> See: >> Stanek v. White, 215 NW 784. >> >>16. It is the general rule that a pledger, >> whose tender (offer) has been refused, >> will not be granted affirmative relief of >> an equitable nature, unless he has kept >> the tender good or at least comes before >> the court in an attitude of willingness >> to pay what is due him. >> See: >> Norton v. Baxter, 41 Minn. d 146; >> Tuthill v. Morris, 81 NY 94. >> >>17. Negotiable note must be promise to pay >> money. >> See: >> Roads v. Webb, 91 Me 410. (Federal >> Reserve Notes are not money.) >> >>18. Federal Reserve notes may be refused. >> See: >> MacLeod v. Hoover, 105 So 205, 159 >> La 244. >> >>19. The only substances ever declared as >> money within the U.S. were gold and >> silver, in coin form, with copper/nickel >> serving in token capacity only. >> See: >> 12 USCA 152 re. "lawful money" and >> Coinage Act of April 2, 1792, at >> Sections 11, 16, & 20; >> re. copper/nickel tokens, see Sec. >> 9, and 31 USCA 460. >> >>20. A legal tender, when made, must be kept >> good according to the rules of the common >> law. >> See: >> William Wolf Co. v. Canadian R.R. >> Co., 56 Pac. Rep 453. >> >>21. It has been held that if the instrument >> recites on its face its consideration, >> the consideration must be proved. >> See: >> Smith v. Doherty, 60 SW 380, 109 Ky >> 616. >> >>22. Where the instrument sued upon is >> non-negotiable, plaintiff must prove its >> consideration. >> See: >> Shubert Theatrical Co. v. Dalton, >> 167 NY S 332. >> >>23. A promissory note is defined as an >> unconditional promise to pay a sum >> certain in dollars. >> See: >> Regulation A, Sec. 4 (1005) (a) >> Federal Reserve Act. (Dollars = >> money, not Federal Reserve notes.) >> >>24. Money imports value. >> See: >> Neufield v. U.S., 118 F.2d 375. >> (What value has a piece of paper >> with green ink on it, especially >> when it is redeemable in no-thing?) >> >>25. Money has value only by law and not by >> nature so that a conviction of those who >> use it is sufficient to deprive it of its >> value and of its purchasing power. >> See: >> Incitti v. Ferrante, 175 A 908. >> >>26. When a contract is agreed to be paid in >> dollars, a payment in money is meant and >> not the transfer of notes. >> See: >> Simon v. Douglas, 225 SW 721; 189 Ky >> 644. >> >>27. Income must be money or that which is >> convertible into money. >> See: >> Snyders Estate, 31 A.2d 132, 136; >> 346 Pa 615. (Is any Federal Reserve >> note convertible at par or >> otherwise, through a bank, for >> money?) >> >>28. Monetary value means value calculated on >> the basis of $1 for an amount of silver >> or gold equal to the amount at the time >> contained in the standard silver dollar >> or gold dollar. >> See: >> USCA Title 31, Chap. 8, Sec. 448(b) >> (Gold and silver have a value lies >> in and of themselves -- notes do >> not.) >> >>29. Money is a commodity, having a value of >> its own. It is a common measure of >> value. It has change ability. >> See: >> U.S. v. Gellman, D.C. Minn. 44 >> F.Supp. 360. (Gold and silver are >> commodities and have a value in and >> of themselves -- notes are not >> commodities and have no value in and >> of themselves. Granted they are >> speculated upon in the money markets >> but that does not mean they have a >> value in and of themselves. Their >> value lies in the confidence of the >> people, not in the thing itself.) >> >>30. Money is defined as meaning a >> representative standard or measure of >> value. >> See: >> Jones v. Overstreet, 4 T.B. Mon. >> 547. >> >>31. The courts have found occasion to decide >> that the pleading did not raise certain >> issues such as: want of consideration >> See: >> Sopp v. Linfrand, 36 P.2d 794; >> negotiability Banca Commission Italiana >> Dr. Genova v. P. Schlegal Co., 80 P 414; >> ownership Sheffield v. Hatch, 135 So 165); >> payment Minor v. Carpenter, 152 P 737. >> >>32. Checkbook money is not legal tender. >> See: >> Story of Checks, Federal Reserve >> Bank of NY, p 20. >> >>33. Commercial banks are important financial >> institutions because they can create >> money--checkbook money. >> See: >> Money's Economic Balance, Federal >> Reserve Bank of NY, P 17 (8th ed., >> 1979). >> >>34. A check is defined as a draft or order >> upon a bank, purporting to be drawn upon >> a deposit of funds for the payment of a >> certain sum of money. >> See: >> Federal Reserve Act, Reg. J, Sec. 3 >> (12). (Money is not notes.) >> >>35. Nothing contained in this chapter shall >> impair the redeemability of any currency >> of the United States. >> See: >> 31 USC 9?6. (If currency has any >> redeemability -- where?) >> >>36. Bank notes are promissory notes of a >> bank, payable to bearer. They are a good >> tender unless objected to at the time >> because not money. >> See: >> Parsons Laws of Business, Page 172. >> (Anything is acceptable as a tender >> unless objected to.) >> >>37. It cannot be doubted that under the >> Constitution the power to provide a >> circulating of coins is given to >> Congress. And it is settled by the >> uniform practice of the government and >> repeated decisions, that Congress may >> constitutionally authorize the omission >> of bills of credit. Having this in the >> exercise of undisputed constitutional >> power undertaken to provide a currency >> for the whole country, it cannot be >> questioned that Congress may >> constitutionally secure the benefit of it >> to the people by appropriate legislation. >> To this end, Congress has denied the >> quality of legal tender to foreign coins, >> and has provided by law against the >> imposition of counterfeit and base coin > ><<< Continued to next message >>> ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail