Time: Fri Apr 04 08:39:33 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA28230; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 08:08:57 -0700 (MST) id KAA08504; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 10:03:12 -0500 (EST) id KAA08486; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 10:03:09 -0500 (EST) id AA25173; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 10:03:05 -0500 by usr05.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id HAA08082; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 07:51:51 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 04 Apr 1997 07:57:57 -0800 To: JAdam2594@aol.com From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SNET: SLS: Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg -> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List Ginsburg is among 8 other Supreme Court Justices who received a formal NOTICE AND DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESIST enforcement of the 14th Amendment, several years ago. This amendment allegedly rendered all native-born Americans "citizens of the United States" [sic], thereby subjecting them to the fraudulent federal income tax. The way to get to her is to send her another formal NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR EXHIBITION OF DOCUMENTS, demanding that she (herself) reveal her oath of office to the American People. If she does not reveal the document, then you move against her in a Quo Warranto Action; you must first request leave of the proper court, since this action is usually brought by the Attorney General. But, we have no Attorney General at the moment, because Reno refused to produce credentials, in response to a proper FOIA request for same. Once revealed, you can compel her obedience to that document, since it is an equitable contract. Equity is brutal, as we say in the legal profession. Moreover, she is paying taxes on her judicial pay, in violation of Article III, Section 1, and the holding in Evans v. Gore (1920). The case which is cited for overturning Evans was founded on the false premise that all federal judges are citizens. There is no law which requires federal judges to citizens of either class (federal or state). I can help with these approaches, but my treasury is empty, thanks to numerous violations of 18 U.S.C. 1513 (the federal witness statute); so, pro bono and contingency contracts are out of the question for me. If we could organize a benefit lecture, I will deliver that lecture, and the videotape sales can also benefit the effort. I am standing by. /s/ Paul Mitchell, federal witness http://www.supremelaw.com p.s. I am now convinced that the ACLU is a wolf in sheep's clothing; they are NOT Our friends. At 08:34 AM 4/4/97 -0500, you wrote: > >--------------------- >Forwarded message: >Subj: Fwd: Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg >Date: 97-04-04 08:15:57 EST >From: Emmilene > > > > I personally am ready to start treason charges against those who say our >constitution is irrelevant anymore. I hear it more and more often >everywhere. Outdated, doesn't apply now, dead old white men, etc etc. When a >document that has made this country what it is today can be tossed aside and >considered out of touch is even talked about like this I get furious. > The time is comming that the Supreme Court will have twisted the one thing >that made this country great, to the point that it is unrecognizable. The >second amendment has been under attack now for years, and is slowly being >eaten away. Now the first amendment is also under attack. One cannot even >stand on a street corner and make speechs without a licence (permission >granted) by the government. >And then only under their specifications. > Land rights are now a thing of the past. >The bells of freedom are being silenced people and we are turning a deaf ear >to it all. > >Where is our heritage? What has happened to our spark of freedom? Have we >lost it >to the powers that be? Is it more important to sit in front of the tv tube or >the computer and waste away our lives, our country? Why aren't we on the >march? What would Thomas Jefferson or George Washington, be doing if enemy's >were setting that document to the flames of irrelavance? Sitting around the >hearth smoking a pipe and talking about what a shame, all that work for >nothing? Have we finally succumed to the point lure of complacency? > It would seem so. >I apologize to our founding fathers for having let their work be for ought. >Emmilene >--------------------- >Forwarded message: >Subj: Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg >Date: 97-04-03 20:39:03 EST >From: PatriotUSA >To: TRUTHinLUV,Rdy4Battle,RSmith1996 >To: Buffy27898,Barry519 >To: Ray673@best.com,RWelsh5128 >To: Minutemn@pcl.net,JanJean,Poes Girl >To: Emmilene,LoisS41729,DotHB > >Friends, > Correct me if I'm wrong, but isnt this the very document that a Supreme >Court Justic is sworn to uphold? > >>From the American Legion Magazine > >There is no talk of impeachment, but Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader >Ginsburg >shook up Capitol Hill by publicly branding the U.S. Constitution an outdated >document,skimpy on individual rights. Congressional insiders predict the >fallout will be intense Senate scrutiny, even rejection, of some of Clinton's >future nominations to the federal bench. > >Ginsburg, a Clinton nominee who was confirmed by a vote of 97-3 worked as >general council for the American Civil Liberties Union ( ACLU ) ACLU Views >dominated a speech at Lousiania State University in which she declared the >the U.S. Constitution "is not regarded as a model document for a modern >state" because the Bill of Rights has " distinct gaps". > >"She's showing her true colors" comments Michael Pendleton of the Judicial >Selection Monitoring Project. Pendleton says the Project will focus on >potential nominees likely to be controversial. > This includes Susan Oki Mollway, who sits on the Hawaii ACLU Board, and >Clarence Sundrum, who supports the legalization of drugs.. > > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ======================================================================== -> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com -> Posted by: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail