Time: Thu Apr 10 06:19:57 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA07230; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 05:57:24 -0700 (MST) by usr08.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA24352; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 05:57:15 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 05:59:20 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Rights Mean Responsibilities (fwd) <snip> > >PLEASE RE-POST > >It is time for everyone to ask themselves some questions, and >attempt to answer those questions honestly. > >Under our system of government we are each morally responsible >for our participation. If you believe there are serious >problems, is it possible to morally avoid the responsibility of >trying to correct those problems? How can you say it is hopeless >to work within the system, and then claim to support the >Constitution? > >If you feel it is hopeless, that only means that you have given up >hope, and it means that you are not joining with others in seeking >a solution. If you are not willing to try everything possible now, >all you can claim in the future is that you gave up; you cannot >claim that you lived up to your responsibilities. Think about that. > >As citizens, if the majority of us say that there is no hope for >peaceful change, this is almost certain to come true. It is almost >equally as certain then that there will be change, but that it will >not be for the better. Is it logical to believe that we can abdicate >our responsibility now, and think that later our government will >ever be reformed for the better? We, the people, are the >government; we do not have the right to abdicate. > >Make no mistake, we strongly believe that it is our responsibility >to be prepared to take whatever steps are necessary to defend our >freedoms and rights. However, we also strongly believe we have >lost the claim to call them our "rights" if we show that the only >way to defend them is through force. > >We either believe in the ideals and principles expressed in the >Declaration of Independence and Constitution, or we do not. >Even as they prepared for the worst, our nation's founders never >ceased to participate in the existing legal institutions until they >were ready to issue a declaration for all the world to see. It was >the actions taken by men and women demonstrating a commitment >to the highest principles and ideals that laid the foundation >for us to claim the moral and eternal right to live as a >free people able to govern ourselves. > >Starting in February we alerted people to some information that >we had come across, and began suggesting solutions. The >solutions and suggestions we made were not targeted at single >issues, because we see that the problem is systemic, it is greater >than any single issue, thus the plans we suggested contained >specific details of the first steps to take for a result that would >be comprehensive and broad in scope. > >There have been three types of responses: 1) Enthusiasm that >someone is suggesting a solution, 2) Neutrality and passivity >(which we all know is the cause of most of our present >problems), and 3) Attacks on us personally and/or attacks on >everything we have suggested. > >Interestingly, none of those who have made efforts to dissuade >others from working with us have proposed or suggested any >alternatives to us. They clearly are either threatened by new ideas >or have personal motivations they would rather not be known. >Certainly, it is obvious they serve no one but themselves, and >serve no purpose other than to aggravate existing problems and >prevent peaceful solutions. We are offering well-developed, >meaningful, legal and peaceful solutions. Our resumes and >references show decades of being well known for our beliefs and >actions. > >We are facing a powerful, wealthy, and well-organized opposing >force, which is why we have proposed two methods, each of >which can help us organize and finance the struggle. We >presented plans that cost you nothing and actually could provide >a good income for many of you. One of those methods involves >using our aggregate financial clout to derive a source of >funding from fees that we already pay for Internet and >telecommunications service. This has previously been explained >in some detail. > >We have proposed and outlined how two different organizations, >one a grassroots coalition, and the other a for-profit business, >are ready right now to begin taking meaningful action. These >organizations would each be self financing and could generate >literally hundreds of millions of dollars over the next year for >media buys, education, training, etc., all in support of change. > >Once we have a large enough number of people (thousands, >rather than the hundreds that have contacted us), we can begin. >Any chance for a real solution depends upon the number of >people that can be shown to have personally expressed their >interest in seeing it happen. > >It is not a matter of working harder, it is a matter of working >smarter. Fifty thousand people all acting together in 100 cities >and towns can have a tremendous impact. If that number, all >across the country, actually coordinated their actions for a few >hours on a given day...? At the very least our numbers would >double as others joined in. Think about it. > >We need to hear from you! We need you to tell everyone you can >about these ideas, plans and methods. If there is no point in >trying, why do you even exist?! If you have suggestions or >questions, we would be thrilled to hear from you... if you are >willing to work together. For those of you who have contacted >us, thank you! > >All we ask is that if you want to work on these solutions, let us >know, spread the word to others, and tell them to let us know. It's >that simple, and it's a real start. > >Development Association for World Networking, Inc. >17218 Wildwood Rd., Jupiter, FL 33478 >561-746-1585 >dawn-publicaffairs@evcom.net > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail