Time: Sat Apr 12 12:00:17 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA14612; Sat, 12 Apr 1997 09:03:39 -0700 (MST) by usr02.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA23757; Sat, 12 Apr 1997 09:03:34 -0700 (MST) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 11:59:20 -0700 To: Josh Hobbs <khobbs@cyberhighway.net> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: Burnett v. Commissioner, USDC Virgin Islands Hello Josh, Thanks for this message. The individual who provided me with the initial report on Burnett is someone in whom I had placed a lot of trust. It was only later that the original message came under suspicion. That was the main reason why I went to the trouble of paying the Clerk of Court in the Virgin Islands for a certified copy of the entire docket file, from which I learned that the original post had made the serious mistake of quoting the Plaintiff's petition as the court's ORDER. Since receiving the full file, I have repeatedly told people about this mistake, even when it has meant that people decide against paying me anything for a copy. It is certainly an important lesson to learn that I cannot, and should not, trust anything which comes across the Internet, without first checking it. I can say this: the evidence concerning the definition of "State" in the Internal Revenue Code, which was the reason for my original interest Burnett, is fully substantiated by the letter which U.S. Representative Barbara Kennelly sent to a man in California, in January of 1996. I do steer people to the Kennelly evidence, and away from the Burnett case, if that is what they are looking for. Remember that Kennelly simply repeated what she had been told by the Legislative Counsel's office, and the staff of the Congressional Research Service. Maybe it's time to subpoena these people, and obtain their sworn testimony concerning this incident. That is a much more fruitful avenue than Burnett, wouldn't you agree? As for my credibility being on the line, there are enough lies circulating about me to fill an ocean, and along with those lies, there are plenty of people who have chosen to believe those lies. I have chosen to ignore them, unless the lies result in real damages to me. I will decide if and when that happens. Nor will I be subjected to any standard of perfection. I am striving for excellence, but not for perfection. The former is achievable; the latter is not. If people want to forget that I am a human being, that is their problem, not mine. While I am thinking of it, I invite you to enroll in the Supreme Law School. Registration details are available at our Web site (see below). One last thing: I do not participate very often in the Supreme Law forum. I prefer to steer people to email communications, either private, or via the many lists which are currently operating. You will get much faster responses from me if you use private (and courteous) email. Thanks for your interest. /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com At 08:08 AM 4/12/97 -0700, you wrote: > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [SMTP:pmitch@primenet.com] >Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 1997 6:23 PM >To: khobbs@cyberhighway.net >Subject: Burnett v. Commissioner, USDC Virgin Islands > >Hi Kevin, > >Are you still interested in this case? > >RSVP > >/s/ Paul Mitchell >http://www.supremelaw.com > <snip> ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail