Time: Wed Apr 16 12:09:04 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA05078; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 09:36:25 -0700 (MST) by usr09.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA12625; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 09:35:58 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 09:47:01 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: L&J: Criminal Gold, Federal Gold [Part 2] (fwd) <snip> > >RETROACTIVE RUBBERSTAMPING: THE EMERGENCY BANKING ACT > >The House of Representatives convened at noon on March 9, 1933. After >the customary opening prayer and the disposing of certain routine >"housekeeping" matters, a message was received from the President which >requested passage of H.R. 1491. > >The bill's preamble dramatizes the haste with which the President's >minions sought to railroad the bill through both Houses of Congress: >"An Act to provide relief in the existing national emergency in >banking, and for other purposes. Be it enacted ... that the Congress >hereby declares that a serious emergency exists and that it is >imperatively necessary speedily to put into effect remedies of uniform >national application." > >In the house, Majority Leader Joseph W. Byrns, Democrat of Tennessee, >asked for immediate consideration of the bill and that debate be >limited to forty minutes, twenty minutes for each party. Mr. Byrns >expressed the hope that > > under the peculiar circumstances and under the serious > circumstances which confront the country, we agree to > take this bill up now, pass it, send it to the Senate > so it may become a law this evening, and thus enable > the President of the United States to open the banks > tomorrow. > >Next rose House Minority Leader Bertrand H. Snell, Republican of New >York. After noting that "it is entirely out of the ordinary to pass >legislation in this House that, as far as I know, is not even in print >at the time it is offered," Mr. Snell, in a burst of bipartisanship, >observed: > > The house is burning down, and the President of the > United States says this is the way to put out the fire. > [Applause.] > ><<Fire, fire, fire. Its *always* fire!>> > > And to me at this time there is only one answer to this > question, and that is to give the President what he > demands and says is necessary to meet the situation. I > do not know that I am in favor of all the details > carried in this bill, but whether I am or not, I am > going to give the President of the United States today > his way. He is the man responsible, and we must at > this time follow his lead. I hope no one on this side > of the aisle will object to the consideration of the > request. [Applause.] > >Someone then produced a copy of the bill, and it was read by the Clerk >of the House. The bill was passed. After a short discussion, the >spectacle of what had just transpired in the House in that hour-and-a- >half session was best expressed by Congressman Lundeen: > > Mr. LUNDEEN. Mr. Speaker, today the Chief Executive > sent to this House of Representatives a banking bill for > immediate enactment. The author of this bill seems to > be unknown. No one has told us who drafted the bill. > There appears to be a printed copy at the speakers desk, > but no printed copies are available for the House > Members. The bill has been driven through the House > with cyclonic speed after 40 minutes debate, 20 minutes > for the minority and 20 minutes for the majority. > > I have demanded a roll call, but have been unable to get > the attention of the Chair. Others have done the same, > notably Congressman Sinclair of North Dakota, and > Congressman Bill Lemke, of North Dakota, as well as some > of our other Farmer-Labor Members. Fifteen men were > standing, demanding a roll call, but that number is not > sufficient; we therefore have the spectacle of the great > House of Representatives of the United States of America > passing, after a 40-minute debate, a bill its Members > never read and never saw, a bill whose author is unknown. > The great majority of the Members have been unable to > get a minute's time to discuss this bill; we have been > refused a roll call; and we have been refused recognition > by the Chair. I do not mean to say that the Speaker of > the House of Representatives intended to ignore us, but > everything was in such a turmoil and there was so much > excitement that we simply were not recognized. > > I WANT TO PUT MYSELF ON RECORD AGAINST PROCEDURE OF THIS > KIND AND AGAINST THE USE OF SUCH METHODS IN PASSING > LEGISLATION AFFECTING MILLIONS OF LIVES AND BILLIONS OF > DOLLARS. IT SEEMS TO ME THAT UNDER THIS BILL THOUSANDS > OF SMALL BANKS WILL BE CRUSHED AND WIPED OUT OF > EXISTENCE, AND THAT MONEY AND CREDIT CONTROL WILL BE > STILL FURTHER CONCENTRATED IN THE HANDS OF THOSE WHO > NOW HOLD THE POWER. > > IT IS SAFE TO SAY THAT IN NORMAL TIMES, AFTER CAREFUL > STUDY OF A PRINTED COPY AND AFTER CAREFUL DEBATE AND > CONSIDERATION, THIS BILL WOULD NEVER HAVE PASSED THIS > HOUSE OR ANY OTHER HOUSE. ITS PASSAGE COULD BE > ACCOMPLISHED ONLY BY RAPID PROCEDURE, HURRIED AND HECTIC > DEBATE, AND A GENERAL RUSH FOR VOTING WITHOUT ROLL CALL. > > I believe in the House of Representatives. I believe in > the power that was given us by the people. I believe > that Congress is the greatest and most powerful body in > America, and I believe that the people have vested in > Congress their ultimate and final power in every great, > vital question, and the Constitution bears me out in > that. > > I am suspicious of this railroading of bills through our > House of Representatives, and I refuse to vote for a > measure unseen and unknown. > > I want the record to show that I was, and am, against > this bill and this method of procedure; and I believe no > good will come out of it for America. We must not > abdicate our power to exercise judgment. We must not > allow ourselves to be swept off our feet by hysteria, > and we must not let the power of the Executive paralyze > our legislative action. If we do, it would be better > for us to resign and go home -- and save the people the > salary they are paying us. > > I look forward to that day when we shall read the bill > we are considering, and see the author of the bill > stand before the House and explain it; and then, after > calm deliberation and sober judgment -- after full and > free debate -- I hope to see sane and sensible > legislation passed which will lift America out of this > panic and disaster into which we were plunged by the > World War. > >Neither "calm deliberation and sober judgment," nor "full and free >debate" characterized what took place next in the Senate, where H.R. >1491 -- which affected "millions of lives and billions of dollars" -- >spent the afternoon with at least eighty United States Senators. >Seventy-three of them voted "yea" and the bill, which had originated in >the House at noon, passed the Senate by 7:30 P.M. Later that same >night, Roosevelt approved it and H.R. 1491 became the Emergency Banking >Act. > >Fundamentally, the Act accomplished three things. First, it >retroactively approved the President's illegal action of March 6, >1933. (If Roosevelt had thought himself to be on solid legal ground >when he closed the banks, one could ask why he thought it necessary to >go to Congress in the first place. This legislative "rubber stamp" >approach to past and future executive action would be used more than >once in the months ahead.) > >Second, it amended section 5(b) of the Trading with the Enemy Act, to >provide that: > > During time of war OR DURING ANY OTHER PERIOD OF > NATIONAL EMERGENCY DECLARED BY THE PRESIDENT, the > President may, through any agency that he may designate, > or otherwise, INVESTIGATE, REGULATE, or PROHIBIT, under > such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, by > means of licenses or otherwise, any transactions in > foreign exchange, transfers of credit between or > payments by banking institutions as defined by the > President, and exporting, hoarding, melting, or > earmarking of gold or silver coin or bullion or > currency, by any person within the United States or any > place subject to the jurisdiction thereof; and the > President may require any person engaged in any > transaction referred to in this subdivision to furnish > under oath, complete information relative thereto, > including the production of any books of account, > contracts, letters or other papers, in connection > therewith in the custody or control of such person, > either before or after such transaction is completed. > Whoever willfully violates any of the provisions of this > subdivision or of any license, order, rule of regulation > issued thereunder, shall, upon conviction, be fined not > more than $10,000, or, if a natural person, may be > imprisoned for not more than ten years, or both; and any > officer, director, or agent of any corporation who > knowingly participates in such violation may be punished > by a like fine, imprisonment, or both. As used in this > subdivision the term "person" means an individual, > partnership, association, or corporation. > >Finally, it added a new subsection (n) to the Federal Reserve Act, >giving the Secretary of the Treasury virtually unfettered discretion to >compel holders of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates to >surrender them to the Treasurer of the United States, and to accept >paper money instead. > >Ironically, while the Act ostensibly reflected Congress' alleged >concern with gold withdrawals, Congress ITSELF took no action at all. >Instead, consonant with the remarks on the floor of each House, >Congress gave the PRESIDENT sole authority to regulate all banks and >financial transactions in general, and everything concerning gold in >particular (with the Secretary of the Treasury acting as his >"Requisitioner-in-Waiting"). And more: Roosevelt's new powers far >surpassed those granted President Wilson by the World War I Trading >with the Enemy Act; Roosevelt's authority extended beyond "time of war" >to "any other period of national emergency declared by the President." >Needless to say, just as the Act contained no elaboration as to what >the current "emergency" was, neither did it establish any criteria by >which the President was to ascertain the existence of any emergency -- >an omission which was to prove crucially important to future presidents >-- and to future owners of gold. > >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >Unsub info - send e-mail to majordomo@majordomo.pobox.com, with >"unsubscribe liberty-and-justice" in the body (not the subject) >Liberty-and-Justice list-owner is Mike Goldman <whig@pobox.com> > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail