Time: Sun May 11 03:28:37 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA20190; Sat, 10 May 1997 20:25:18 -0700 (MST) id XAA21352; Sat, 10 May 1997 23:18:22 -0400 (EDT) id XAA21335; Sat, 10 May 1997 23:18:19 -0400 (EDT) id AA06349; Sat, 10 May 1997 23:18:18 -0400 by usr02.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA16357; Sat, 10 May 1997 20:17:29 -0700 (MST) Date: Sun, 11 May 1997 03:13:44 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SNET: SLF: When General Lee surrendered .... -> SearchNet's SNETNEWS Mailing List Dear America, I would like to offer a study sequence to you, in order for you to begin appreciating why it is that I continue to harp on the evidence that the United States (federal government) is operating a widespread extortion racket, and has been for many generations. Choosing a place to begin is not hard, because many of you who have had the opportunity to visit the nation's Capitol, and you probably also went for a trip to the Lincoln and Jefferson Memorials. When I visited Washington, D.C., I went to both, and I must say that they are both impressive monuments. But, I submit to you that Jefferson was the better man of the two, notwithstanding the obvious contradictions that We see in his ownership of slaves. I say this because We have been indoctrinated for decades into believing that Abraham Lincoln could do no wrong, and that it was some sort of moral imperative that the Union Army win the Civil War, one of the most violent and bloody wars this planet has ever seen. I ask you to suspend any judgments you may have in this regard, until you have had a chance to read some of that history, immediately after the Civil War ended. I promise you that what you will learn, will utterly amaze you, and it will also help Me to make my point here about the United States (federal government) extortion racket. Exactly 100 years after the so-called 14th amendment was declared ratified, the Utah Supreme Court was presented with a criminal appeal in which the privileges and immunities guaranteed by that so-called amendment were at issue. The court took the opportunity to recite a large number of historical facts which had been published in the Congressional Record only one year before. Please be aware that the 14th amendment contains a "second" privileges and immunities clause; the first Privileges and Immunities Clause was in the organic U.S. Constitution from the beginning. See 4:2:1 (my short-hand for Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1). They needed a "second" clause because they were in the process of creating a "second" class of citizens -- Federal citizens! As history would have it, the Louisiana delegation in the House of Representatives hired a former judge, Lander Perez, to assemble a massive amount of historical evidence which proves that the 14th amendment was an equally massive fraud upon the entire nation. As an experienced jurist, Judge Perez knew how to present this material in a way that was convincing to other jurists, and to jurors. What resulted was a body of knowledge which is so impressive, the Utah Supreme Court as much adopted it as irrefutable (and thus unrefuted) proof that Article V was clearly violated in the adoption of that amendment. The case in which these historical details were recited, in excruciating detail, is Dyett v. Turner, 439 P.2d 266, 270 (1968). You must read past part of the decision, until you reach the point at which the Utah Supreme Court states, "General Lee had surrendered ...." This, of course, was the dramatic moment which marked the end of that horrible conflict, and it marked the beginning of actions by the Congress of the United States which, by all standards of law and justice, had to be one of the most corrupt, vengeful, and cruel bodies ever to step foot inside the District of Columbia, even more corrupt that today's Congress, and that is really saying something. I encourage you to get this decision, and to begin reading where "General Lee had surrendered ...." The Supreme Law Firm can supply you with an electronic copy, if you don't already have one. You see, the 14th amendment is pivotal to the federal government, because it allowed Congress to begin assembling a group of people who were all associated by way of one thing: Federal citizenship. Since citizenship, as such, is a term of municipal law, and since the high Court has ruled that the Constitution does not apply inside the District of Columbia, this association was, and is, beyond the reach of the U.S. Constitution, and the magnificent guarantees which it was established to promote and maintain, for all time, until the end of time. As you read Dyett v. Turner, keep in the back of your mind the fact that Section 4 of the 14th amendment contains an utterly amazing, and mostly overlooked, provision, namely, that the validity of the public debt shall not be questioned. Well, by proving that this amendment was never lawfully ratified, there is no such provision anywhere in the U.S. Constitution. Actually, in all legal pleadings, the Supreme Law Firm has now adopted the following convention: We refer to the U.S. Constitution as the "Constitution for the United States of America, as lawfully amended (hereinafter 'U.S. Constitution')". This explicitly preserves Our Right to challenge the validity of the public debt, at any time. One last thought: remember that all public officials, state and federal, elected or appointed, must take an oath to support the U.S. Constitution. However, since there is a very legitimate debate about the ratification of several key amendments, like the 14th and 16th, I leave you with one loaded question: How is it possible for Citizens to enforce, and how is it possible for public officials to obey, their solemn oath to support and defend the U.S. Constitution, if the weight of verifiable, historical evidence now proves that the exact provisions of that Constitution are still in doubt, for any reason? Think about it! This is the situation that confronts Us, as a Nation, at the present time. To this end, We have conceived of "The New Amendment," as We call it, which serves to repeal the 14th amendment explicitly, and to correct the immensely massive errors which Congress foisted on the entire nation, in the period immediately after the Civil War ended. If you have not also received a copy of "The New Amendment," please let Me know, and I will be happy to forward one to you as soon as possible. Please have patience, because the Supreme Law Firm is being inundated with requests for information. So, please consider enrolling in the Supreme Law School, so that your enrollment fees can help defray the very real costs that accumulate as We continue to broadcast this information to the entire Nation, one individual at a time. As We have said, in many different places, and now at many different times, it is Our duty now to ensure that this statutory slavery -- Federal citizenship -- is soon Gone with the Wind, just like its grisly and ill-fated predecessor. /s/ Paul Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Citizen of Arizona state (expressly not a citizen of the United States) http://www.supremelaw.com All Rights Reserved without Prejudice ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ======================================================================== -> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@world.std.com -> Posted by: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail