Time: Fri May 09 06:24:21 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA13486;
	Fri, 9 May 1997 06:18:50 -0700 (MST)
	by usr06.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA22694;
	Fri, 9 May 1997 06:15:13 -0700 (MST)
Date: Fri, 09 May 1997 06:18:47 -0700
To: fwolist@sportsmen.net
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Intent of Constitution

I knew that my statement below would
generate lots of interesting comments.
The Constitution is a set of chains
which we can put on government actors.
Think of them as "The Chained Gang"!
In other words, without the chains,
they are just a gang.  Juries have
the power to lock, or unlock, those
chains, and it is our job to convince
juries that our position is correct.
That is the Constitution -- alive
and well.  The rest of the story is
mostly academic.

/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com



At 07:03 PM 5/8/97 -0700, you wrote:
>================[ Distributed Message ]================
>         ListServer: fwolist (Free World Order)
>               Type: Not Moderated
>     Distributed on: 08-MAY-97, 19:02:56
>Original Written by: IN:paracles@magg.net.
>=======================================================
>
>
>On 8 May 1997 13:03 -0700 (-1200), fwolist@sportsmen.net wrote to me:
>
>> ================[ Distributed Message ]================
>> ListServer: fwolist (Free World Order)
>> Type: Not Moderated
>> Distributed on: 08-MAY-97, 13:01:50
>> Original Written by: IN:pmitch@primenet.com.
>> =======================================================
>
>
>> Dear America,
>
>> I submit to you the proposition that the
>> Constitution for the United States of America,
>> as lawfully amended, contains no provision
>> for its own self-destruction, with the sole
>> exception of Article V, which empowers the
>> several states, and ONLY the several states,
>> to amend the Constitution at will.  When faced
>> with the real prospect of amending the 
>> Constitution out of existence, I doubt very
>> much whether such a proposal would survive
>> the first state legislature to vote on such
>> a thing, even if such a fantastic and idiotic
>> thing were ever to survive a vote in Congress.
>> But, then again, our Congress has done some
>> pretty criminal things over the years, so 
>> I wouldn't put it beyond Our Congress to do 
>> this too!  I am not saying such a congressional
>> vote would be criminal;  but I do think it would
>> be rather idiotic.  Quo vadis emergencia!
>
>> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>
>This is another of Paul's little misunderstandings in relation to the
>constitution of the united States of America.  The constitution
>specifically states under Article I, section five, clause five:
>
>          Neither house, during the session of Congress, 
>          shall, without the consent of the other, 
>          adjourn for more than three days, nor to any 
>          other place than that in which the two houses 
>          shall be sitting.
>
>Now, just imagine what should happen if this didn't happen, yet the
>representatives should go home anyway?.  Of course Paul will say, but
>nothing will happen.  That's because Paul doesn't understand the
>maxim of ''conduct of the Parties'', now do you Paul?
>
>Have a wonderful weekend all
>
>William Gordon
>
>
>========================================================================
>To subscribe: send a message to the fwolist@sportsmen.net
>with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject/topic field.  Use UNSUBSCRIBE to
>remove yourself from the list. Questions/comments/problems?
>    email: Not Moderated@sportsmen.net or listmgmt@sportsmen.net
>For info about this system and its lists email: info@sportsmen.net
>
>======================================================================== 
>via: Sportsman's Paradise~~Online 602-922-1639 - www.sportsmen.net
>
>
>
>

========================================================================
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.    : Counselor at Law, federal witness
email:       [address in tool bar]   : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU
web site:  http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this
========================================================================


      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail