Time: Tue May 06 20:50:26 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA19777 for [address in tool bar]; Tue, 6 May 1997 18:29:15 -0700 (MST) Delivered-To: liberty-and-justice-outgoing@majordomo.pobox.com Date: Tue, 06 May 1997 20:36:51 -0700 To: (Recipient list suppressed) From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: L&J: SLS: Open question for Leroy Schweitzer Dear America and LeRoy Schweitzer, Since you have not answered any of my recent mail, and since you have done absolutely nothing to date to help, or even inquire, as to the fate of the invoice for professional services which Mr. Randy Parsons asked me to prepare, and submit, to the Freedom Center in Billings, Montana state, I now have a few pointed questions for you, and I do feel that you have a legal and moral obligation to answer these questions, because we had a contract, which you and your associates have breached quite deliberately, as far as I can tell. So, here is question #1: You claimed to be an expert in American banking laws and procedures, particularly when you began to teach your seminars, which people traveled from great distances, in some cases, to attend. Setting aside some of the obvious controversies that erupted as a result of your associates' position with respect to other human races, I want to put a much more direct question to you about the fate of the commercial warrants which you were promoting, and using, to purchase equipment, discharge debt, and do a number of other things. So, here goes: If you were so educated in commercial banking law, that you could attract students from all over the country, are you asking me, and others, to believe that you had no idea what would happen to these commercial warrants, when you and others tried to clear them through banks, credit card companies, the Internal Revenue Service, mortage lenders, and the like? It would seem to be a rather risky proposition to encourage heavy traffic in these warrants, without first having assembled a jury of peers, in a court of competent jurisdiction, such as the local county district court (like the one where I filed the Petition for TRO to keep the feds from shooting you to death). Would you agree, or disagree, with this statement? By the way, I totally disagee with your construction of the term "one supreme Court" as that term is used in the U.S. Constitution. I believe that "one" means one, as in "one, two, three." But, you are surely entitled to your opinion, and I mine. If you do agree that it was a rather risky proposition, in light of all your fore-knowledge about the likely fate of these commercial warrants, then why didn't you get declaratory relief from a jury of peers first, before touting them as the silver-bullet solution to all IRS debts and the like? I mean, I had people flocking to me with PROOF that the U.S. Postmaster was actually honoring these warrants. "LeRoy Schweitzer told me so," they said. I am asking this question, because the evidence available to me now indicates that each and every one of those commercial warrants has eventually worked its way straight into the hands of the FBI, whereupon the FBI handed them over to the local offices of the United States Attorney, criminal investigation division. See the article from the Dallas Morning News concerning the so-called "Freeman Tentacle," as Morris Dees calls it. Did it not occur to you that this kind of thing might happen, and probably involve hundreds, if not thousands, of people in the need to defend themselves before a very hostile federal judiciary? and spend scarce resources on legal assistance, filing fees, and process servers? and fines, penalties, forfeitures, and probably also bankruptcies, if and when lenders foreclosed on home mortgages? Please answer yes, or no. You will note that the Justice Department is now, apparently, using a successor to the PROMIS software which they stole from the Inslaw company, and then bribed a federal judge to uphold the theft, all the while they were exploiting the vast power of this software to access electronic banking records and record-match their way to a field day with the types of electronic information which could be assembled, as these commercial warrants and associated electronic records worked their way through the network of electronic banking databases which now litter the nation's landscape. Maybe you were never well enough informed of the heavy investment which American banks have made in high-powered computers during the past 20 years. Again, since you were touting yourself as a banking expert, I would have expected you to be thoroughly familiar with this technology as well. I am, because I have done systems programming for a large investment bank, and I can tell you that writing a purchase order for another million dollars worth of computer hardware was a regular occurrence at the investment bank where I consulted for about a year. These were certified checks, and not commercial warrants which were based on a new instrument which was unproven in the banking world. I hope I haven't compromised your privacy, or your defense, with these difficult and pointed questions, but my hindsight tells me that you may have been a tad negligent to get so many people on your bandwagon (bankwagon), just as it ran out of gas. I would expect you to say the very same things about me, if I had been in your shoes, and you in mine. By the way, have you tried to walk a mile in my moccasins lately? I have been where you are: I lectured at Elizabeth Broderick's seminars, but when I started to ask questions about the rubber stamp "U S CRIMINAL COURT" which she used to press ink on her "perfected" commercial lien, they loaned me a car with tampered front brakes and, when that failed, they gutted the legal office I was assembling to develop a decent civil and criminal defense in her two cases, with 4 other defendants who also refuse to answer any of my mail now. Do you agree with me that there is a real pattern developing here, a pattern which is not of my own making, but one which is being imposed upon me from the outside? By the way, the FBI stole the best videotape I have ever made: it was the lecture which I gave after a stirring Easter sermon which a Paulist Father gave for our benefit, just one week earlier. I veered away from federal law to share some personal things, and I took the opportunity to relate the same story which Father Dougherty had told, about a prostitute who became best friends with the Maker of the Universe. I am telling you this, in case you ever have a chance to view this movie. I won't, because the FBI has it, and they won't return it. Please do let me know if they ever show it to you. Or, should I say, please let me know if you ever plan to show it to Us again, some day soon. I await your sincere and considerate response. /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ======================================================================== =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Unsub info - send e-mail to majordomo@majordomo.pobox.com, with "unsubscribe liberty-and-justice" in the body (not the subject) Liberty-and-Justice list-owner is Mike Goldman <whig@pobox.com>
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail