Time: Fri May 16 10:48:22 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA15886;
Fri, 16 May 1997 22:27:05 -0700 (MST)
by usr08.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA10795;
Fri, 16 May 1997 22:23:29 -0700 (MST)
Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 10:47:17 -0700
To: fwolist@sportsmen.net
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: NOT-AG Reno (fwd)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
excerpt sic:
>
>Paul Mitchell and Scott,
>
>I would like to see someone try to enforce that Janet Reno isn't
>the present Attorney General.
>
>------
>Doug
It is being done in a variety of ways,
especially in IRS cases, because the
Attorney General AND the Secretary of
the Treasury (or their delegates)
both must authorize actions for the
collection and/or enforcement of
federal income taxes. Gilbertson
did it in U.S.A. v. Gilbertson, and
that case is now up to the Eighth Circuit,
on a Motion for Rehearing En Banc, to
release him from prison, pending appeal.
I will be writing the Opening Brief in
about 2 weeks; we obviously want him
out, to help coordinate the arguments.
See IRC 7401 (NOT 26 U.S.C. 7401), and
the powerful Cadillac case (actually,
it is a BMW, imho :)
Since Reno defaulted in the face of one
FOIA request and appeal so far, and then
also a 10-day courtesy letter, she is
now estopped in cases where the defendant
has executed the same sequence.
The permanent way to remove her is
for such an aggrieved defendant
to move up to Quo Warranto,
and then to estop her from exhibiting
any credentials when forced to do so
by the court. This is the law, and QW
is an ancient writ -- like Habeas Corpus.
The holding which controls is Carmine
v. Bowen: silence activates estoppel.
You can tell from the Latin :)
(Cicero actually wrote the Declaration of
Independence in a dream, and Thomas
Jefferson merely translated, but in
the third Person. I prefer first -- myself :)
You must have standing to sue in this
fashion, however, or any good judge would
throw it out on this important technicality.
Usually, private Citizens must petition
for leave to institute Quo Warranto, because
it is a prerogative Writ for the State.
See Notice of Intent to Petition for Leave
to Institute Quo Warranto in People v.
United States et al., now awaiting district
judge's certification for appeal to proceed.
We may have to punt, and petition the 9th
Circuit for leave to appeal interlocutory
orders. (See Final Judgements Act.)
This QW will dismantle the IRS, officially.
The case is already won, because the evidence
is now uncontroverted. See "The Cooper File"
by William Cooper and Wayne Bentson. This is
a brilliant piece of work, BTW; we are planning
to host this path-breaking research on our web site,
as soon as our rocket-scientist gets back from
Hubbling around the Universe. :)
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com
p.s. I just came from Andy Garcia's
latest movie. I think he's great --
just needs better writers. His line
about white tennis shoes is the best.
So, I'm a little disjointed. I don't
think New York City is in either zone. :)
At 07:59 AM 5/16/97 -0700, you wrote:
>================[ Distributed Message ]================
> ListServer: fwolist (Free World Order)
> Type: Not Moderated
> Distributed on: 16-MAY-97, 07:59:08
>Original Written by: IN:apta@discover.net.
>=======================================================
>
>
>Paul Mitchell and Scott,
>
>I would like to see someone try to enforce that Janet Reno isn't
>the present Attorney General.
>
>------
>Doug
>
>
>fwolist@sportsmen.net wrote:
>>
>> ================[ Distributed Message ]================
>> ListServer: fwolist (Free World Order)
>> Type: Not Moderated
>> Distributed on: 16-MAY-97, 03:27:30
>> Original Written by: IN:grscott@primenet.com.
>> =======================================================
>>
>> We are currently at the ten (10) day point
>> in the FOIA process for the credentials of this
>> Reno chick. Out of curiosity, does IRC §7401
>> have an implementing regulation for it's
>> enforcement? Is it incorporated in the Federal
>> Register, as required? Shouldn't IRC §7401 be
>> referred to as 26 USC §7401?
>>
>> Does anyone have the 1972 Cadillac Case in
>> electronic format?
>>
>> Thank you in advance.
>>
>> In Freedom,
>> Scott
>>
>> ---
>> Dear Americans,
>>
>> Here is an open suggestion to every American:
>>
>> Send a FOIA request to Janet Reno for a certified
>> copy of her Appointment Affidavit (an OMB-approved
>> form). I can post the one I sent, if you want
>> to copy from a template.
>>
>> I can supply you with an electronic copy of the
>> Citizen's Guide to the FOIA/Privacy Act, now
>> a rare government document which is out of print.
>> This is a great document, by the way.
>>
>> After 10 working days, you will file a standard appeal,
>> if she fails to produce her credentials (and she
>> will fail, you can bet on that). This is a simple,
>> one-page "reminder."
>>
>> When you get to that point, check out the article
>> entitled "Karma and the Federal Courts" in the
>> Supreme Law Library at URL:
>>
>> http://www.supremelaw.com
>>
>> and you will be well situated to sue her for
>> her failure to produce the requested document.
>>
>> Without the requisite oath of office, required
>> by 5 U.S.C. 3331, she is not Attorney General;
>> it is that simple, folks. Really, it is THAT
>> simple.
>>
>> We did one more thing: we sent her a 10-day
>> courtesy notice, to remind her that the 20-day
>> deadline on responding to the FOIA appeal was
>> about to lapse.
>>
>> It lapsed.
>>
>> Janet Reno, NOT Attorney General
>>
>> Now, that means she cannot delegate ANY authority
>> downwards, to anybody in the Department of Justice.
>>
>> With this in mind, check out IRC 7401, which
>> requires authorizations by the Attorney General
>> (or her delegate) AND the Secretary of the Treasury
>> (or his delegate). Without both, the court is
>> denied jurisdiction to proceed. The 1972 Cadillac
>> case proves it. (Citation available on polite
>> request.)
>>
>> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>> http://www.supremelaw.com
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> ================================================================
>> All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice • FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS GROUP
>> For Privacy: social security number rescission and consultation;
>> pure contractual trusts; gold-backed banking; offshore banking;
>> International Business Company formation; resident agent service
>> mailto:grscott@primenet.com
>> ================================================================
>>
>> "Hey, YOU, don't even *think* about pickin' my pocket!"
>>
>> "Privacy is a fundamental Right. Assert it."
>>
>> ========================================================================
>> To subscribe: send a message to the fwolist@sportsmen.net
>> with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject/topic field. Use UNSUBSCRIBE to
>> remove yourself from the list. Questions/comments/problems?
>> email: Not Moderated@sportsmen.net or listmgmt@sportsmen.net
>> For info about this system and its lists email: info@sportsmen.net
>>
>> ========================================================================
>> via: Sportsman's Paradise~~Online 602-922-1639 - www.sportsmen.net
>
>
>
>========================================================================
>To subscribe: send a message to the fwolist@sportsmen.net
>with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject/topic field. Use UNSUBSCRIBE to
>remove yourself from the list. Questions/comments/problems?
> email: Not Moderated@sportsmen.net or listmgmt@sportsmen.net
>For info about this system and its lists email: info@sportsmen.net
>
>========================================================================
>via: Sportsman's Paradise~~Online 602-922-1639 - www.sportsmen.net
>
>
>
>
========================================================================
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness
email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU
web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail