Time: Wed May 21 10:13:09 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA01050; Wed, 21 May 1997 08:48:35 -0700 (MST) by usr04.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA02292; Wed, 21 May 1997 08:47:52 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 10:12:05 -0700 To: "Richard C. Green" <patriotlad@worldnet.att.net> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: SLS: Federal Judge Impeachment Sought (fwd) References: <3.0.1.16.19970521065702.369f81e8@pop.primenet.com> At 11:36 AM 5/21/97 -0400, you wrote: >Mr. Mitchell: > >Wow! You gotta bring me up to speed on this Fed. Alcohol thing: > >"At that point in the litigation, Paul Mitchell felt it was >appropriate to place the foreperson on the Service List for all >subsequent pleadings that would be filed in that case. >Altogether, some 26 separate pleadings were prepared and filed, >several of which contained affidavits and verified material >evidence concerning such matters as the defunct Performance >Management and Recognition System ("PMRS"), the original >Thirteenth Amendment, and the historial evidence proving that the >"IRS" is just an alias for the Federal Alcohol Administration, >domiciled in Puerto Rico as Trust #62. As expected, Judge Roll >obstructed each and every one of the 26 pleadings, in addition to >the two original communications, which were mailed to the grand >jury foreperson." > >Also what is PRMS? > >Richard C. Green Richard, See "The Cooper File" attached, for definitive details on the Puerto Rico connection. The following summarizes PMRS: [This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] For Immediate Release November 4, 1996 The Kick-Back Racket: Performance Management and Recognition System by Paul Andrew Mitchell All Rights Reserved (October 1996) It is becoming increasing apparent, in large part because of a conspiracy of silence which has descended upon the District of Columbia in recent months, that President Clinton has a lot of explaining to do, in quite a few executive departments. One of the best suppressed stories of his administration thus far is evidence of White House kick-backs from the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") for each and every indictment issued by federal grand juries against "illegal tax protestors," whatever they are. The term itself is an oxymoron, because protest has never been illegal in America. Protest is even recognized by the federal government's precious Uniform Commercial Code for repudiating presentments in a lawful manner. So, for the phrase "illegal tax protestor" to withstand the obvious constitutional challenge (yes, the First Amendment is still the supreme Law in America), the adjective "illegal" must modify the noun "tax." This is a telling admission on the part of our vaulted Congress of what many Americans have known for a long time, namely, the federal income tax is a total and utter fraud, from stem to stern. Our Ship of State is a sieve at sea that's riddled with loop-holes and sinking fast. What makes this term even more obnoxious is the way in which the IRS now attacks American "rebels" who dare to learn and speak the truth. A key page from the Internal Revenue Manual ("IRM") clearly shows that the President routinely receives $35,000 from the Performance Management and Recognition System ("PMRS"). We have a political prisoner in federal custody right now who is prepared to testify that the President receives this sum each and every time a federal grand jury issues an indictment against any illegal tax protestor ("ITP"). U.S. Attorneys receive a mere $25,000 per indictment of ITP's. Now, if the Department of Justice ("DOJ") has a secret task force in place to attack ITP's who've become organized, like the former Pilot Connection Society which has been reported to have over 5,000 members, the President stands to rake in a tidy sum if his hench-persons in the DOJ succeed in bringing grand jury indictments against all 5,000. Let's see, 5,000 times $35,000 equals $175,000,000. The bad news for President Clinton is that the IRM provides absolutely no authority for these "performance recognition rewards" (read "kick-backs"). Courts have consistently ruled that the IRM has no more authority than a pizza recipe, when it comes to authorizing salaries and other The Kick-Back Racket: Page 1 of 3 compensation for federal government employees. Federal employee salaries must be determined by Acts of Congress, and the IRM is a far cry from that high standard of law. Furthermore, the Constitution forbids the President from receiving any other "emoluments" during his term of office. See Article II, Section 1, Clause 7: "... he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them." A FOIA request by this author for all PMRS records produced an admission, on Treasury Department letterhead, that some records do not exist because the rewards were paid in cash. This is bad enough. But, when you couple these kick-backs with the perjury racket now rampant within the Department of Just US, and with a grand jury system which badly needs either complete overhaul or abolition, you quickly find that the indictments issuing from federal grand juries, for alleged violations of the Internal Revenue Code, are really threats, engineered by the biggest extortion racket this planet has ever seen. Jury tampering, perjury, and obstruction of justice are terms which do a far better job of describing what is really going on. In one recent grand jury case, involving a subpoena for certain books and records, a federal judge in Arizona conspired with the Assistant U.S. Attorney ("AUSA") to commit 27 counts of mail fraud, 27 counts of jury tampering, 27 counts of obstruction of justice, and 27 counts of conspiracy to commit all of the above. When a formal request was submitted to that grand jury to investigate probable violations of federal law by the AUSA, the judge intercepted this certified request, and all subsequent pleadings which were then directed to the grand jury by Counsel in order to keep them informed of what was really going on. These pleadings contained crucial evidence -- you guessed it -- of the PMRS kick-back racket, and of a pattern of pathological lying by the AUSA dating back to a $4,797 fine imposed on him for repeatedly lying to a federal court in Phoenix. This was unprecedented for federal courts who almost never eat their own. Last but not least, the evidence is now overwhelming that the law which Congress enacted to qualify and convene all juries, both grand and trial, is horribly defective for exhibiting obvious class bias against state Citizens who are not also federal citizens. The courts have consistently ruled that Americans can be state Citizens without also being federal citizens, whether or not the federal government's precious Fourteenth Amendment was properly approved and adopted (and we now know that it was not). Unfortunately for Congress, this class discrimination in the Jury Selection and Service Act, Title 28 United States Code Sections 1861 thru 1865, invalidates each and every federal grand jury indictment, and each and every federal trial jury verdict, ever since the end of the Civil War. The United States is now in very deep trouble for putting so many Americans in federal prisons, with absolutely no lawful authority whatsoever to do so. Couple that with the fact that the U.S. incarceration rate is twice as high as it is in South Africa, which is second world-wide in prisoners per capita. The Kick-Back Racket: Page 2 of 3 Do you think maybe that the federal government may be running an extortion racket here, just for money? I think so. I know so. I can prove it. I am appalled. Common Law Copyright Paul Andrew Mitchell Counselor at Law, federal witness and Citizen of Arizona state All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice November 4, 1996 # # # The Kick-Back Racket: Page 3 of 3 FIRST AMENDMENT PETITION TO CONGRESS FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES Dear Representative/Senator ____________________________________: This is a formal Petition to Congress for redress of a major grievance which I have with the federal government. Recent research has disclosed that the original motive for Prohibition (the Volstead Act), was to give oil companies an unfair jump on their monopoly over automotive fuels. It also appears that the BATF were created to disperse an unlawful police force throughout the several States, under the guise of controlling commerce in alcohol. Once the monopoly was in place, Prohibition was repealed, leaving alcohol high and dry as the preferred fuel for automobiles, and leaving this unlawful police force in place to extort money from the American People. This research also proves that the "Internal Revenue Service" [sic] is actually an alias for the Federal Alcohol Administration domiciled at Trust #62 in Puerto Rico, under an Act of Congress which was held to be unconstitutional in 1935. The proof is found, among other places, in all the references to Title 27 which can be found in the regulations for Title 26. None of these regulations is lawful, because IRC 7851(a)(6)(A) states that the provisions of subtitle F shall take effect on the day after the date of enactment of Title 26. Unfortunately for the federal government, Title 26, as such, has never been enacted into positive law, rendering ALL the enforcement provisions of subtitle F null and void. For example, the authority to issue regulations in the first instance is found in subtitle F. From the research cited above, I have come to believe that the United States federal government is now engaged in a criminal syndicate of extortion, perjury, mail fraud, theft, conversion, fraud, and conspiracy involving all of the above. I therefore demand immediate hearings on the relations between the "Internal Revenue Service" and the Federal Alcohol Administration domiciled in Puerto Rico and operating elsewhere on this planet. If these hearings should prove that the Internal Revenue Service is not a lawful organization within the United States Department of the Treasury, then it is time for a major shift in the wind, because every piece of mail they are sending these days is one count of mail fraud by the sender. I think you will agree that We, as a Nation, have a very big problem here. I will look forward to your immediate response to this formal, verified Petition for Redress of this major grievance which I, and millions of other Americans, now have against the United States (federal government). I never thought I would see the day when I would be forced to define the "United States" as a criminal enterprise, but sadly that day has now arrived. VERIFICATION I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, without the "United States", that the above statements of fact are true and correct, to the best of my current information, knowledge, and belief, so help Me God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1). Executed on the ____________ day of ______________________, 1997. Signed and printed, Citizen of __________________________ state all rights reserved without prejudice Attachment Converted: "C:\ATTACH\COOPER.doc" Attachment Converted: "C:\ATTACH\COOPER1.doc" ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail