Time: Wed May 21 23:34:21 1997
	by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA21667;
	Wed, 21 May 1997 23:27:30 -0700 (MST)
	by usr04.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA23229;
	Wed, 21 May 1997 23:27:20 -0700 (MST)
Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 23:36:27 -0700
To: swampy@ptialaska.net
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: SLS: Amendments to Constitution
References: <3.0.1.16.19970521081437.2b57e95a@pop.primenet.com>

Gordon,

Thank you very much for this revealing
news about your attempts to litigate
the failed ratification of the so-called
14th amendment.  I have taken the liberty
of forwarding your message to all clients
of the Supreme Law School, who literally
devour the latest news about this kind of
thing.  Following this message, I will
send to you my copies of a Notice and
Demand to the Supreme Court to Cease and
Desist enforcing the 14th amendment [sic],
and an electronic copy of Dyett v. Turner,
in case you don't already have it.  Start
reading where "General Lee had surrendered ...."
Also, do you have my proposal to repeal
the 14th with "The New Amendment"?  I will
find that one among my mountains of email, and
send that to you as well.  These things 
will be arriving separately in your in-box,
one after the other.

Be well, and keep the faith.  We win!

/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com



At 07:01 PM 5/21/97 -0800, you wrote:
>Paul Andrew Mitchell wrote:
>> 
>> You have a conflict of law here, at the very least,
>> because the Full Faith and Credit Clause binds
>> federal government officers, employees, and agents
>> to give full faith and credit in each state to the
>> public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings
>> of every other state.  Accordingly, all government
>> employees are bound to give full faith and credit
>> to the historical facts recited in Dyett v. Turner,
>> 439 P.2d 266, 270 (1968).  Begin reading where
>> "General Lee had surrendered ...."  To my mind,
>> "full faith and credit" means to take formal Notice
>> of the facts which are in evidence, and to avoid
>> basing conclusions on facts which are not in evidence.
>> On this basis, if a U.S. Secretary of State certifies
>> the 14th amendment, he has based his certification on
>> facts which were not in evidence, in violation of the
>> Full Faith and Credit Clause.  Thus, his act fails,
>> because it is null and void for violating this clause.
>> 
>> /s/ Paul Mitchell
>> http://www.supremelaw.com
>> 
>
>
>Dear Paul
>
>Thank you for your input, I never gave the Full Faith and Credit Clause
>much thought.
>
>As you may be aware, I have taken the 14th Amendment all the way through
>the Federal Court system to the U.S. Supreme Court.  On the many
>questions presented (and certified exhibites entered into the record of
>the Court), the Courts refused to address any of the questions presented
>and declared the matter to be a "political question."
>
>I have tried to get a hearing before Congress, but my plea goes
>unanswered (not surprising).  This why I was entertaining the thought of
>approaching the National Archives under 1 USC 106b for an Administrative
>Hearing.  I really don't expect to get anywhere, after all, the 14th
>Amendment is a powerful tool of for the Congress.
>
>If you would like to see what I have done in the past (which the justice
>department wanted the 9th Circuite Court of Appeals to fine me $10,000
>for bringing the 14th Amendment into the Courts) please read my Home
>Page:
>
>          http://www.ptialaska.net/~swampy/
>
>I did not include the copies of the House and Senate Journals of the
>States that voted on the Amendment on my Web Page, they would take up
>more room than I am alloted for the Web Page.  These Journals show that
>more than 1/4th of the States rejected the Amendment. (The votes were
>cast before the "Reconstruction Acts" were enacted by Congress).
>
>         Gordon Epperly
>
>Attachment Converted: "C:\ATTACH\ReSLSAme"
>

========================================================================
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.    : Counselor at Law, federal witness
email:       [address in tool bar]   : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU
web site:  http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech,  at its best
             Tucson, Arizona state   : state zone,  not the federal zone
             Postal Zone 85719/tdc   : USPS delays first class  w/o this
========================================================================


      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail