Time: Fri May 23 06:28:27 1997
by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA14069;
Fri, 23 May 1997 06:15:17 -0700 (MST)
by usr09.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA23952;
Fri, 23 May 1997 06:15:10 -0700 (MST)
Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 06:26:56 -0700
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Specific Questions for Mr. Lowell Becraft
Hello Ron,
No, I do not have Mr. Becraft's email
address.
I now wish to confront him for the
following conduct of his, which I
witnessed personally (with the
exception of Point 9 below).
Feel free to forward these questions
directly to him, if and when you find
his email address:
1. Why did he write to the author of
"The Federal Zone" and demand that the
author stop selling that book? He alleged
that it was "harming people." Did he
mean to imply that other forms of tax
protest were NOT harming people?
2. Why did he and Wayne Bentson recommend
that Eugene A. Burns retain a licensed
bar member from Phoenix to defend Burns'
trust against a grand jury subpoena,
and do so with me listening on a conference
call, when Burns had already retained a
licensed bar member in James Everett?
3. Why did he advise Eugene A. Burns that
Burns did not have a right to a jury trial
in that case, when FRCP Rule 38 specifically
says that the right to trial by jury shall
be preserved inviolate?
4. In what other ways, if any, has Mr. Becraft
interferred or otherwise obstructed the legal
work I have done for clients around the
country? In light of points 1 thru 3 above,
I feel that this is not an inappropriate
question, as well.
5. Has Mr. Becraft slandered, or libeled, the
author of "The Federal Zone" and/or unjustly
criticized any of the work which is published
in that book? Did Mr. Becraft obtain a copy
of that book, without paying for that copy?
Did Mr. Becraft ever read the book? The author
has no record of any book order or payment from
Mr. Becraft.
6. Why did Mr. Becraft fail to answer the memo
which the author of the "The Federal Zone"
wrote to him concerning the all-important
distinction between general federal laws,
and federal municipal laws?
7. Why did Mr. Becraft insist that the federal
income tax is imposed on "aliens here, and
citizens abroad," when the state Supreme Court
in his home state had already ruled that there
are two (2) classes of citizenship?
8. Why does Mr. Becraft insist on retaining his
bar license, when the historical record now
proves that the original 13th Amendment was
ratified, penalizing bar licensees with the
loss of citizenship and disqualification from
ever serving in any public office anywhere
in America (e.g. "officer of the court")?
9. What conduct of his caused Mr. Bill Medina in
northern California to chastise Mr. Becraft
so harshly? The conduct in question occurred
in a federal court hearing, in a tax-related
case, if I am not mistaken.
10. Mr. Becraft, do you abuse alcohol?
/s/ Paul Mitchell
http://www.supremelaw.com
At 10:04 PM 5/22/97 -0700, you wrote:
>Hi Paul,
>Do you have Mr. Becraft's e-mail or web site addresses? Thanks, Ron
========================================================================
Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness
email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.1 on Intel 586 CPU
web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration
ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best
Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone
Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this
========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail