Time: Wed Jun 04 06:06:30 1997 by primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA25137; Wed, 4 Jun 1997 06:08:39 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 1997 06:05:26 -0700 To: fwolist@sportsmen.net From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: FOIA request for Janet Reno's official credentials Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit This is a stock reply which they are now using. Don't believe it. In all our FOIA requests, we have a brief paragraph which politely asks the disclosure officer to forward the request to the correct individual, if the disclosure officer is not the correct individual. That way, when they send it back, you can send another copy of the original request, with this paragraph highlighted in yellow (their favorite color). What I would do now is to send the identical FOIA request to Betty S. Clark and Benjamin F. Burrell. I believe they are now very uptight about all FOIA requests, because of our discovery last year that the court of original jurisdiction to enforce the FOIA is the DCUS, pursuant to ORDER of John M. Roll in the USDC, Arizona, on May 12, 1996. For background, read "Karma and the Federal Court" in the Supreme Law Library at URL: http://www.supremelaw.com /s/ Paul Mitchell http://www.supremelaw.com At 09:13 PM 6/3/97 -0700, you wrote: >================[ Distributed Message ]================ > ListServer: fwolist (Free World Order) > Type: Not Moderated > Distributed on: 03-JUN-97, 21:12:54 >Original Written by: IN:grscott@primenet.com. >======================================================= > > >I have executed FOIA requests for the official credentials >of the alleged Attorney General of the United States, Janet >Reno. My original request was dated May 2, 1997; appeal >dated May 17, 1997 and Courtesy Notice dated May 27, 1997. > >The following letter was posted to me on May 29, 1997. >This constitutes the respect our Just-Us Department has >for *their own* federal laws. Pay careful notice to where >they directed me to "resubmit" the FOIA request. > >--- > >U.S. Department of Justice >Washington, D.C. > >May 28, 1997 > >[my name] > >Dear [me]: > >Your Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act (FOIA/PA) >request was received by this office which serves as the >receipt and referral unit for FOIA/PA requests addressed >to the Department of Justice. > >The Freedom of information and Privacy Act apply only to >the records of agencies within the Executive Branch of >the Federal Government. > >Your request designated organizations outside of the >Department of Justice and will have to be resubmitted by >you directly to them.* > >Sincerely, > >/s/ Betty S. Clark for >Benjamin F. Burrell, Director >Facilities and Administrative > Services Staff >Justice Management Division > >*Public Library > Tucson, Arizona 85719 > >---end of letter--- > > > > >[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] > >-----------------------------cut here---------------------------- > > c/o 2509 N. Campbell > Tucson [zip code exempt] > ARIZONA REPUBLIC > > May 2, 1997 > > FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST > >Disclosure Officer >Office of the Attorney General >Department of Justice >10th and Constitution, N.W. >Washington [zip code exempt] >DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA > >Subject: Credentials of Janet Reno [sic] > "Attorney General" [sic] > Department of Justice > Washington, D.C. > >Dear Disclosure Officer: > >This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. >552 et seq., and regulations thereunder. This is My firm promise >to pay fees and costs for locating, duplicating, and mailing to >Me certified copies of the records requested below. > >If some of this request is exempt from release, please furnish Me >with those portions reasonably segregable. I am requiring >certified copies of the documents requested, in lieu of personal >inspection of same. > >Admissible documents requested: > > 1. Certified copy of the solemn oath of office of one > named Janet Reno, as required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and by > Article VI, Clause 3, of the Constitution for the > United States of America, as lawfully amended. > > 2. Certified copy of her fidelity bond or surety bond. > > 3. Certified copy of her Appointment Affidavit, signed and > witnessed, for the position she currently claims to > occupy. (This is an OMB-approved form.) > > 4. Certified copy of the formal delegation of authority, > beginning with the President, linking all officials in > the chain of command between him and the position she > currently claims to occupy. > > 5. Certified copy of her license to practice law in the > District of Columbia, if any. > > >The requested records are not exempt from disclosure because >they: > > [Please see next page.] > >-----------------------------cut here---------------------------- > > (A) could not reasonably be expected to interfere with law > enforcement proceedings; > > (B) would not deprive a person of a right to a fair trial > or an impartial adjudication; > > (C) could not reasonably be expected to constitute an > unwarranted invasion of personal property; > > (D) could not reasonably be expected to disclose the > identity of a confidential source; > > (E) would not disclose techniques and procedures for law > enforcement investigations or prosecutions, and would > not disclose guidelines for law enforcement > investigations or prosecutions; > > (F) could not reasonably be expected to endanger the life > or physical safety of any individual. > > [see Exemption 7 in FOIA] > >If you are not the correct person to whom this Freedom of >Information Act Request should be directed, kindly forward it to >the correct person. > >Time is of the essence. If you have any questions about your >rights and obligations under 5 U.S.C. 552, may we recommend that >you contact the office of the Attorney General in Washington, >D.C., for immediate assistance. > >Please see U.S. Postal Service Publication #221 for addressing >instructions. > >Thank you very much for your consideration, and for your timely >obedience to the controlling laws in this matter, specifically >the Freedom of Information Act and the Constitution for the >United States of America, as lawfully amended. > > >Respectfully submitted, > >/s/ [me] > >Citizen of Arizona state >all rights reserved without prejudice > >copy: Janet Reno > Department of Justice > 10th and Constitution, N.W. > Washington > DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA > > > # # # > >-----------------------------cut here---------------------------- > > c/o 2509 N. Campbell > Tucson, Arizona state > zip code exempt > May 17, 1997 > > > FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT APPEAL > > >Disclosure Officer >Office of the Attorney General >Department of Justice >10th and Constitution, N.W. >Washington [zip code exempt] >DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA > >Dear Disclosure Officer: > >This is an appeal under the Freedom of Information Act. > >On May 2, 1997, I requested documents under the Freedom of >Information Act (see attached). To date, the requested documents >have not been produced. > >I hereby appeal your failure to produce the requested documents. > >The documents that were withheld must be disclosed under the FOIA >because the original Thirteenth Amendment prevents government >officials from exercising privileges of a nobility class, such as >being exempt from the principles of open government and freedom >of information. Evidence of the original Thirteenth Amendment >has been filed with the Foreperson of the Grand Jury and with the >Clerk of the United States District Court in Tucson, Arizona >state (a Republic). See also Colorado Records Custodian. > >Disclosure of the documents which I requested is in the public >interest because the information, and the procedure for obtaining >the information, are likely to contribute significantly to public >understanding of the operations and activities of government and >are not primarily in My commercial interest. > >Moreover, the information requested will help to improve public >confidence in the integrity of the United States (federal >government), or to confirm that there are persons attempting to >exercise executive and judicial branch powers in America without >any authority or jurisdiction whatsoever. See U.S. v. Lopez. > >Thank you for your careful consideration of this appeal. > >Respectfully submitted, > >/s/ [me] > >Citizen of Arizona state >all rights reserved without prejudice > > > # # # > >-----------------------------cut here---------------------------- > > c/o 2509 N. Campbell > Tucson [zip code exempt] > ARIZONA REPUBLIC > > May 27, 1997 > > COURTESY NOTICE > >Janet Reno >U.S. Department of Justice >10th and Constitution, N.W. >Washington [zip code exempt] >DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA > >Subject: FOIA request and appeal > for your credentials > >Dear Ms. Reno: > >This is a courtesy notice to you, and to all of those government >officers, employees, and agents who rely upon formal delegation >of authority from the office of the U.S. Attorney General to >perfect their actions under authority of the United States >(federal government), that the final deadline for production of >your official credentials will fall on Monday, June 2, 1997, >at 5:00 p.m. Notice to principals is notice to agents. > >Our original request for your credentials was submitted to you >via first class United States Mail on May 2, 1997 pursuant >to the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. 552 et seq. >Our administrative appeal for said credentials, given your >failure to produce same in response to Our proper request dated >May 2, 1997, was submitted to you via first class United >States Mail on May 17, 1997. > >The final deadline for production of your official credentials >falls officially on June 2, 1997 at end of the working day >(5:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time). Beyond that deadline, Our >administrative remedies will have been exhausted, and the >doctrine of estoppel by acquiescence will be activated formally, >finally, and forever. > >If I need to explain to you the far-reaching implications that >will issue from your failure to produce, among other things, the >Oath of Office required of you by Article VI, Clause 3, in the >Constitution for the United States of America, as lawfully >amended, then Our nation is in much worse shape than I ever >thought possible heretofore. > > >Respectfully submitted, > >/s/ [me] > >Citizen of Arizona state > > > # # # > >-----------------------------cut here---------------------------- > >================================================================ >All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice • FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS GROUP >For Privacy: social security number rescission and consultation; >pure contractual trusts; gold-backed banking; offshore banking; >International Business Company formation; resident agent service > mailto:grscott@primenet.com >================================================================ > >"Hey, YOU, don't even *think* about pickin' my pocket!" > >"Privacy is a fundamental Right. Assert it." > > >======================================================================== >To subscribe: send a message to the fwolist@sportsmen.net >with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject/topic field. Use UNSUBSCRIBE to >remove yourself from the list. Questions/comments/problems? > email: Not Moderated@sportsmen.net or listmgmt@sportsmen.net >For info about this system and its lists email: info@sportsmen.net > >======================================================================== >via: Sportsman's Paradise~~Online 602-922-1639 - www.sportsmen.net > > > > ======================================================================== Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S. : Counselor at Law, federal witness email: [address in tool bar] : Eudora Pro 3.0.2 on Intel 586 CPU web site: http://www.supremelaw.com : library & law school registration ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776 : this is free speech, at its best Tucson, Arizona state : state zone, not the federal zone Postal Zone 85719/tdc : USPS delays first class w/o this ========================================================================
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail