Time: Tue Oct 29 09:46:16 1996 To: Tim Richardson <timr@efn.org> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: The Kick-Back Racket (fwd) Cc: Bcc: Tim, See my comments below: /s/ Paul Mitchell At 08:16 AM 10/29/96 -0800, you wrote: >Forwarded message: >> The Kick-Back Racket: >> Performance Management and >> Recognition System >> >> by >> >> Paul Andrew Mitchell >> All Rights Reserved >> (October 1996) >> >> >> It is becoming increasing apparent, in large >> part because of a conspiracy of silence which >> has descended upon the District of Columbia >> in recent months, that President Clinton has >> a lot of explaining to do, in quite a few >> departments. One of the best suppressed stories >> of his administration thus far is evidence >> of White House kick-backs from the IRS for each >> and every indictment issued by federal grand >> juries against "illegal tax protestors," whatever >> they are. > > > Dear Paul Mitchell, > > I need whatever help you may have to offer... you may have contacts > with the law and information which could help mitigate, to some > degree, what the IRS is doing to us. To wit: > > A couple of weeks ago a very good friend of mine, Steve Riley, > (Steve is former law enforcement and has several good contacts > locally) that they (the FBI) had heard that the IRS here was > setting me up for a violent, armed confrontation so that I could > be killed and gotten out of the way... obviously I have > irritated someone -- 'course I teach the law to those evil > "constitutionalists" and the like, so perhaps I'm doing > something right! If these allegations are correct, they should be documented in an affidavit, and you should file immediately for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against the suspects, to chill them out a little bit. Do this in your local county court; it will lie, and do it NOW!! > > But right or not, we don't need a violent, armed confrontation > here or anywhere in the country right now...we are too close to > a major revelation in the judiciary. There are several cases > sitting before the supreme Court right now, Dan Meador's being > just one of them which, when heard, will result in a major change > in the way the judiciary does "business". If they rule against > these plaintiffs, we will all know that the Constitution is > dead, and that there is NO remedy within the law; and if they > rule in favor of these plaintiffs, we will have a remedy within > the law by being able to bring the real Constitution for the united > States of America into the courtrooms and force the judges and > prosecutors to live up to it and their oaths of office. > > But, for now what I need is some "protection" and the only > good protection I know of is the law and the enforcement of > that. You may also need to flee. Be realistic here; you have an obligation to protect your own life. Are you a federal witness? If there is anything you can do to help, I would be > most appreciative -- we are using the law here in Deprivation > of Rights suits and criminal complaints against corrupt local > officials at the county, state and federal levels, but what > is needed is more. See above. I would also go to the local police; dress up and be very polite and concerned. The cops know when people are lying, usually. > > Micaela Dutson, a licensed attorney is meeting with the IRS on > Tuesday morning, today, in an attempt to get them to start > obeying the law -- God! what a novel concept that might be!!! But > Paula (my wife) and I won't be there since the IRS told Ms. Dutson > that they didn't have sufficient security to be able to meet with > us present, since, I guess the inference is, that we are armed > and dangerous individuals... we have been vilified and demonized > in the local press as being "freeman" and the like, despite not > a single shred of evidence to support such a fallacious contention. You probably have been misclassified as Illegal Tax Protestors, or worse, Potentially Dangerous Taxpayers. The application of these mis-classifications is a matter which we are currently litigating. > > But if Micaela's not successful, the IRS will try to sell our > house on the following day, Wed, the 30th. File for a Quiet Title action immediately. You will get an automatic stay against foreclosure. Subsequent to that > I'd kind of expect the SWAT teams out here to "evict" us, hoping > that I'll resist and they can then shoot me and be done with it. > So PLEASE make phone calls or whatever you can and lets see if we > can invoke the law this time -- God willing! > you can generate. I like to stay in the shadows during this kind of thing. Again, get a Quiet Title action into state Superior Court right away. This will buy time to let things cool down. > > Hold in mind of course that "selling" our house is a strange > proposition since 1) it has never been titled to Paula and/or I > and it has always been in the name of "techNET, Inc." Of course > if the IRS wants to pierce the corporate veil, they are welcome > to try, but it has to be done in court -- a small oversight on > the part of the collection agent I'm sure. Due process of law is a fundamental Right, and deprivation of fundamental Rights is a serious felony in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242. Again, are you a federal witness? If so, they may be violating 18 U.S.C. 1513: retaliation against a federal witness. The IRS has never > filed a notice of lien, much less a lien, against techNET, Inc., > only ever against Paula and I. You can sort this all out in the Quiet Title action ("QT"). And 2), there is a 70,000 dollar > first mortgage and back county taxes due and payable on sale, > and there is a $190,000 UCC-1 financing statement of lien filed > in the recorders office about 2 1/2 years ago against "techNET, > Inc., and Paula and I" by a company in California to which techNET > owed money...making the total $$liability about 300,000 for a > house worth, at best, about $$210,000. So like I said, selling > what??? Your QT can get to motive(s) later. > > Feel 100% free to use this letter or any part of it you wish in > any communication of any nature you want to; Internet, phone > calls, letters, personal meetings, etc. You have our explicit > permission to use our names or other names contained herein, > or which you discover in connection with this matter. My standard rate is $75.00 per hour, with a standard retainer of $500 payable in advance in cash or blank U.S. Postal Money Order. I work against the retainer, and then require additional advances in minimal increments of $250. /s/ Paul Mitchell > >-- > ******************************************************************** > "The strength and power of despotism consists wholly in the fear > of resistance." > --Thomas Paine > ******************************************************************** > "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom, > It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves." > -- William Pitt, to the House of Commons, 18th November, 1783. > ******************************************************************** > > timr@efn.org > Timothy Lee, Richardson > (541) 895-4681 (FAX) > (541) 895-4417 (VOICE) > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail