Time: Tue Oct 29 16:01:17 1996 To: From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: One Worthy Proposal (was "Dole Bulemics!") Cc: Bcc: Liberty Law, Nancy Lord <snip> >> The present administration has corrupted and politicized every >>aspect of the national government. This is especially true of the secret >>police agencies. It is also true of the courts and the justice >>department. If the present gang of thugs are re-elected, there is not >>going to be any check on their activities. This bodes very ill for >>ourselves and our liberties. We saw the Brady's there on the podium. We >>saw Waco. If we let them stay, we are next. This bunch has already >>shaken off scandals that would have brought down any previous government. >>After this election, we will have no other check on them. They will call >>all the shots. The press covers their butts like a diaper. The >>investigative agencies are corrupted. The courts are corrupted. It even >>appears that the intelligence agencies are in the same sorry fix. How >>then, are the Clintons to be brought to justice? How are we going to >>maintain what little remains of our liberties? >> > >I would add the following modifier: this is the base problem. >A lot of people whine about corruption in politics, but the vast majority >of people do not care. > >I believe that we are at a juncture where the rule of law is at stake. > >Do the laws of the land apply to all, irrespective of individual >party politics and individual power? > >Do they apply to the intelligence agencies, when gross moral violations, >like massive drug-running, have occurred? (We aren't talking fine points >of covert operations here.) > >I think that for the long term health of the Republic, the best thing >that could happen would be a Clinton victory, re-election of Republican >majorities in House and Senate, and full scale investigations into the >CIA drug running, drug money corruption in the banking and political >systems, and the Clinton's felonious behaviour in raising political funds, >burying bodies, and just plain doing what it takes to consolidate power. > >What happened to Vince Foster, Ron Brown, and William Colby? Why is >Clinton's Lasater connection brushed under the rug? What about the >bit players (Furgeson and Jerry Parks) who have turned up dead? > >If Bush (former CIA director) gets dragged into this mess, then so be it. >Ditto for Ronnie Reagan. If Ollie North's diaries implicate others, then >too bad. Nothing but a fully energized Republican Party, willing to push >the law to the brink of a Constitutional crisis is going to resolve any >of this. If he has got the evidence, let Starr step up and bring down >a standing President. > >The legislative control of the TLA's is an issue that has recurred for the >past 40 years or so. Its time for a gloves off rehash of these issues, >with at least the threat of impeachment raised as a real possibility. >The Agency was making so much money on their cover operations and running >so many private airlines that they were totally outside Congressional control >in the late 60's and 70's. Well, its happened again in the 80's and 90's. > >The alternative is to slip a little closer to Banana Republic status, with >two or three classes of people, all unequal before the law, "disappearances" >and large flow of illegal money the norm. > >Remember, Nixon was re-elected by a landslide and Colson went to jail for >improperly viewing *one* FBI file. > >ciao, > >Jack Curtis > >P.S. I agree totally on the AR15 toting wannabees. The examples we've seen >thusfar are a bunch of thoroughly infiltrated nitwits. I'll state right now >that I know enough history to *run* from anyone expousing any kind of >"revolution".
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail