Time: Wed Oct 30 08:25:55 1996 To: "Geoffrey Stewart Nimmo" <nextwave@one.net> From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: LAZARGRAM Cc: fsphys@brunswickmicro.nb.ca Bcc: At 09:49 AM 10/30/96 -0500, you wrote: >Dear Paul, > >Stanton Friedman is the leading researcher on the Lazar conundrum. >I offer you a letter he sent me yesterday. > >Best Regards, > >Geoff > >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ (Waves!) > >---------- >From: fsphys@brunswickmicro.nb.ca >To: Geoffrey Stewart Nimmo <nextwave@one.net> >Subject: Re: The Purpose of the Philadelphia Experiment >Date: Tuesday, October 29, 1996 10:51 PM > >Re Paul Mitchell's letter. The video he is referring to is the Bob Lazar >piece. >It is science fiction. Lazar is not a scientist, has no degrees, has >repeatedly >lied about his background.His scheme won't work, there is no stable element >115. >Also at 99.9% of C, it only takes 20 months to go 37 light years. So forget > >"incredibly long times to reach such distant places at normal light speed." > >Alpha Centauri is less than 5 light years away. > > >Stan Friedman. Dear Geoff, Thanks so much for keeping me in the loop. I am obviously out of my field here, but I do try to monitor issues affecting public energy policy. Propulsion for interstellar travel is one such issue. Am I being too "linear" here, or does it not take 37 years (+ or -) to travel 37 light years at 100% of C? "C" is the same as found in "E = M x C x C". What am I missing, if anything? Maybe you could forward this to Stan for some clarification. /s/ Paul Mitchell
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail