Time: Wed Oct 30 12:27:22 1996 To: pmitch@primenet.com From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: OUT OF STEP Online #18 Cc: Bcc: >Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 12:28:00 -0700 (MST) >To: pmitch@primenet.com >From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] >Subject: OUT OF STEP Online #18 > >>From: tab@hollyent.com >>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 11:41:24 -0700 >>Subject: OUT OF STEP Online #18 >>To: pmitch@primenet.com >> >>================[ Distributed Message ]================ >> ListServer: TAB (Take America Back Mail List) >> Type: Not Moderated >> Distributed on: 30-OCT-96, 11:41:10 >>Original Written by: IN:ftbrady@cosmoslink.net. >>======================================================= >> >> >>OUT OF STEP Online #18 >>Insights & Strategies for the New Individualist Left >>October 30, 1996 >>Editor: Wally Conger >>============================================ >> >>THE STARR INDICTMENTS II >> >>by J. Orlin Grabbe >> >>It looks like the mainstream media was right and I was wrong. Though perhaps >>not for the reason they think. >> >>I had followed the progress of the Starr probe carefully and knew when the >>first (unannounced) indictment was handed down in Arkansas. I also knew how >>angry Starr was at press reports he had "promised" not to announce anything >>prior to the November election, and how eager he was to get the indictment >>particulars out into the public domain. I also knew of at least five people >>who were indictment targets. >> >>But there were two glitches that affected the original timing. The first one >>was good: more walk-in witnesses. (More accurately, the witnesses were >>dragged in.) Their testimony greatly improved the conviction probability of >>the charges against Hillary Rodham Clinton. The second glitch was legal in >>nature. An outside review of the indictments as signed by the grand juries >>both in Arkansas and New York made important criticisms of the wording. So >>the indictments were rewritten both in Arkansas and New York earlier this >>month. The revised indictments had to be re-presented to the grand juries. >> But the revised versions had been signed in both locations by the end of day >>Friday, October 18. >> >>I anticipated the indictment particulars would be made public the following >>week. But no news was forthcoming. The first intimation I received there >>might be a change in plans was when an individual connected to the Starr >>investigation observed that the election wasn't really over until the state >>electors had cast their votes in December. This was offered as a simple >>observation, without elaboration. >> >>The second indication was when the Fifth Column said they would not be giving >>Bob Dole a second incriminating financial package prior to the election. >> (The first package induced Dole to resign from the Senate.) Explanation: >> "So as to not be seen as playing politics." Of course, it wouldn't be >>playing partisan politics if Clinton and Dole went out together. >> >>The final indication was the incarceration of Charles Hayes in Kentucky. >> Hayes had reminded me more than once: "Before this is over, it's going to >>get rough. Mark my words: It's going to get rough." >> >>I knew how rough it had already become. A silent war had been in existence >>for the past two months. A committee formed under the Emergency Powers Act >>was negotiating with Bill Clinton over his resignation, and Clinton was using >>his powers as President to fight them every step of the way. And I knew that >>this committee, not Starr, was in charge of the timing of the indictment >>announcements. The committee was trying to deal with a Criminal Presidency, >>on a neutral bi-partisan basis--but to keep things silently in the >>background. Hayes, as a participant in this fight, had deflected so many >>attempts on his life as to seem invulnerable. His incarceration showed how >>massive the battle had become. >> >>Of course, it is times like this that give definition to the term >>"fair-weather friends". But for the rest, here is what is important to keep >>in mind: This is only a temporary setback. It is not the end of the war. >> >>And battleship-size Roto-rooters have been prepared both for Bill Clinton and >>the U.S. Department of Justice. >> >>(October 27, 1996) >> >> >> >>======================================================================== >>To subscribe: send a message to the Tab@hollyent.com >>with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject/topic field. Use UNSUBSCRIBE to >>remove yourself from the list. Use HELP for a list of all commands. >>Questions/comments/problems? >> email: Not Moderated@hollyent.com or listmgmt@hollyent.com >>For information about this system email: info@hollyent.com >>======================================================================== >>via: Holly Enterprises 602-922-1639 - www.hollyent.com >> >> >> > >=========================================================== >Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.: pmitch@primenet.com >ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state >=========================================================== > > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail