Time: Wed Oct 30 12:27:56 1996 To: pmitch@primenet.com From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: OUT OF STEP Online #18 Cc: Bcc: >Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 12:28:35 -0700 (MST) >To: pmitch@primenet.com >From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] >Subject: OUT OF STEP Online #18 > >>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 12:28:00 -0700 (MST) >>To: pmitch@primenet.com >>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] >>Subject: OUT OF STEP Online #18 >> >>>From: tab@hollyent.com >>>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 11:41:24 -0700 >>>Subject: OUT OF STEP Online #18 >>>To: pmitch@primenet.com >>> >>>================[ Distributed Message ]================ >>> ListServer: TAB (Take America Back Mail List) >>> Type: Not Moderated >>> Distributed on: 30-OCT-96, 11:41:10 >>>Original Written by: IN:ftbrady@cosmoslink.net. >>>======================================================= >>> >>> >>>OUT OF STEP Online #18 >>>Insights & Strategies for the New Individualist Left >>>October 30, 1996 >>>Editor: Wally Conger >>>============================================ >>> >>>THE STARR INDICTMENTS II >>> >>>by J. Orlin Grabbe >>> >>>It looks like the mainstream media was right and I was wrong. Though perhaps >>>not for the reason they think. >>> >>>I had followed the progress of the Starr probe carefully and knew when the >>>first (unannounced) indictment was handed down in Arkansas. I also knew how >>>angry Starr was at press reports he had "promised" not to announce anything >>>prior to the November election, and how eager he was to get the indictment >>>particulars out into the public domain. I also knew of at least five people >>>who were indictment targets. >>> >>>But there were two glitches that affected the original timing. The first one >>>was good: more walk-in witnesses. (More accurately, the witnesses were >>>dragged in.) Their testimony greatly improved the conviction probability of >>>the charges against Hillary Rodham Clinton. The second glitch was legal in >>>nature. An outside review of the indictments as signed by the grand juries >>>both in Arkansas and New York made important criticisms of the wording. So >>>the indictments were rewritten both in Arkansas and New York earlier this >>>month. The revised indictments had to be re-presented to the grand juries. >>> But the revised versions had been signed in both locations by the end of day >>>Friday, October 18. >>> >>>I anticipated the indictment particulars would be made public the following >>>week. But no news was forthcoming. The first intimation I received there >>>might be a change in plans was when an individual connected to the Starr >>>investigation observed that the election wasn't really over until the state >>>electors had cast their votes in December. This was offered as a simple >>>observation, without elaboration. >>> >>>The second indication was when the Fifth Column said they would not be giving >>>Bob Dole a second incriminating financial package prior to the election. >>> (The first package induced Dole to resign from the Senate.) Explanation: >>> "So as to not be seen as playing politics." Of course, it wouldn't be >>>playing partisan politics if Clinton and Dole went out together. >>> >>>The final indication was the incarceration of Charles Hayes in Kentucky. >>> Hayes had reminded me more than once: "Before this is over, it's going to >>>get rough. Mark my words: It's going to get rough." >>> >>>I knew how rough it had already become. A silent war had been in existence >>>for the past two months. A committee formed under the Emergency Powers Act >>>was negotiating with Bill Clinton over his resignation, and Clinton was using >>>his powers as President to fight them every step of the way. And I knew that >>>this committee, not Starr, was in charge of the timing of the indictment >>>announcements. The committee was trying to deal with a Criminal Presidency, >>>on a neutral bi-partisan basis--but to keep things silently in the >>>background. Hayes, as a participant in this fight, had deflected so many >>>attempts on his life as to seem invulnerable. His incarceration showed how >>>massive the battle had become. >>> >>>Of course, it is times like this that give definition to the term >>>"fair-weather friends". But for the rest, here is what is important to keep >>>in mind: This is only a temporary setback. It is not the end of the war. >>> >>>And battleship-size Roto-rooters have been prepared both for Bill Clinton and >>>the U.S. Department of Justice. >>> >>>(October 27, 1996) >>> >>> >>> >>>======================================================================== >>>To subscribe: send a message to the Tab@hollyent.com >>>with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject/topic field. Use UNSUBSCRIBE to >>>remove yourself from the list. Use HELP for a list of all commands. >>>Questions/comments/problems? >>> email: Not Moderated@hollyent.com or listmgmt@hollyent.com >>>For information about this system email: info@hollyent.com >>>======================================================================== >>>via: Holly Enterprises 602-922-1639 - www.hollyent.com >>> >>> >>> >> >>=========================================================== >>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.: pmitch@primenet.com >>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state >>=========================================================== >> >> >> > >=========================================================== >Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.: pmitch@primenet.com >ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state >=========================================================== > > >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail