Time: Wed Oct 30 12:52:59 1996 To: Electra From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: Please forward to Nancy Lord Cc: Bcc: >Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 15:44:57 >To: Nancy Lord >From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] >Subject: FOR YOUR EYES ONLY > >FOR YOUR EYES ONLY > >>Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 15:42:04 >>To: "Harvest" <harvest@whitemtns.com> >>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] >>Subject: A Personal Request >> >>Dear Mr. Cooper, >> >>When I was a research associate at the >>University of California, I had the good >>fortune of working under a former Navy >>Captain who helped bombard Iwo Jima. >>He was an unusually kind man, who was >>also a great boss. He once told me that >>he was the one who did ALL the aiming and >>firing for all four triple-gun turrets >>which bombarded that island. He didn't >>want a miss to fall on the shoulders of >>any of his sailor subordinates. The >>Marines, one of whom was my father, >>later remarked how precise the bombardment >>was: he could drop 12-inch shells right >>down a chimney, and this from a battleship >>listing and recoiling 5 feet from every >>salvo. >> >>I have a very urgent reason to contact him, >>because I believe we are approaching a >>high water mark of judicial corruption in >>America, and I need to brief supportive >>personnel in the Pentagon as to what is >>really going on. I am an eyewitness to >>quite a few incidents of judicial tyranny, >>and Title 18, U.S.C. Section 4, gives me >>the authority I need to approach military >>personnel. The FBI is doing nothing but >>push paper. The Justice Department is >>complicit. The Board of Governors of the >>U.S. Postal Service are sitting on their >>hands. On and on it goes. >> >>If we need to show some of these people >>that we can overpower the U.S. Marshals, >>particularly when they are covering for >>the felonies of certain federal judges, >>the only way to do that is to make a >>"presence" felt, preferably in some >>very subtle, but genuine ways. My first >>thought is to recommend that a number of >>undercover ONI personnel become eyewitnesses >>to similar events. Such events now happen with >>such a high frequency, they would not really need >>to depend on hearsay or even affidavits to >>witness personally what I am talking about. >> >>So, my request is this: if I needed to >>reach this Captain in the Pentagon, would >>you be willing to be a go-between so that >>the Captain will know that my reason for >>contacting him is genuine, and that I do really >>need to meet privately with him, pursuant >>to 18 USC 4? It has been many years since >>I have had any contact with him, but he will >>recognize me immediately, and will certainly >>give us an audience, if only to catch up on >>news from our respective lives. >> >>I would be most appreciative, Mr. Cooper. >> >>The only downside here is that the Captain >>has probably retired already, but that should >>be easy enough to find out. He still would >>be able to suggest a number of contacts to >>us, once he hears the entire story. >> >>I am standing by. >> >>/s/ Paul Mitchell >> >> >>P.S. I will be happy to learn PGP, >>in order to encrypt subsequent email >>messages on this subject. Over and out. >> >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail