Time: Wed Oct 30 12:53:22 1996 To: Electra From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: Please forward to Nancy Lord Cc: Bcc: >Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 23:31:36 >To: Nancy Lord <defense@mindspring.com> >From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] >Subject: Re: Research point > >At 11:26 PM 10/29/96 -0500, you wrote: >>At 05:28 PM 10/29/96 -0700, you wrote: >>>At 05:49 PM 10/29/96 -0600, you wrote: >>>>Tuesday, 29Oct96 @ 17:48 Hours CST >>>> >>>>TO: Paul Mitchell >>>>From: Dale Robertson >>>>Subject: Research Point >>>> >>>>Re-post to your at your request, as follows: >>><snip> >>>>Monday, 28Oct96 @ 14:37 Hours CST >>>> >>>>TO: Counselors - all >>>>From: Joseph Dale Robertson >>>>Subject: What is "United States" & Who is required to file a return? >>>> >>>> >>>>At this time, there is an active pending case in the USDC and Bankruptcy >>>>in which there is an opportunity (as well as necessity) to adjudicate >>>>the the following issues: >>>> >>>>1. As it pertains to "income" as defined under Title 26 of the United >>>>States Code, are individuals within the various 50 states within the >>>>definition of "United States"? >> >>Dear Paul, >> I may have already told you this, but >>I saw that "State" definition somewhere too. >>I believe its an old FDA statute, or maybe >>something to do with importation. Will look >>for it when this brief is finished. >> How do I get on Alta Vista? I'm having >>a lot of trouble using the Webb and I'd really >>like to read your book. >> >>Nancy > >Hi Nancy, > >Using your web browser, use the >search function, and scroll >until you reach a list of choices. >Alta Vista should be among them. >If you can't find it, call your >service provider, and ask for >help navigating. When you find >it, make a bookmark (or a favorite). >Then, have some fun, because >Alta Vista is fast Fast FAST. > >I can email you a copy of my book. >What encodings can you handle? >I can send in MIME, BinHex, and >Uuencode. You have been able >to read the ones I have sent you >so far, correct? Chapter 11 is >a good one, but you have probably >already seen that chapter in the >jury challenge I prepared. > >/s/ Paul Mitchell > >>> >>>You are already stepping with >>>the wrong foot forward. Title >>>26, as such, has never been >>>enacted into law, so it is, at best, >>>rebuttable evidence of the law(s) >>>in question. >>> >>>As for the IRC, the Kennelly letter >>>is important evidence that the >>>definition of "State" at IRC >>>3121(e) embraces ONLY the named >>>territories and possessions, and >>>the District of Columbia. >>>Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius. >>> >>>Rep. Kennelly should be subpoened >>>to testify about the evidence she >>>received from the Legislative Counsel >>>and the Congressional Research Service. >>>She is from Connecticut. Go get her. >>> >>>Finally, "income" is not defined as >>>such in the IRC. See U.S. v. Ballard, >>>which rendered this question res >>>judicata. >>> >>> >>>> >>>>2. Who is required to file a return? >>> >>>Anybody made liable. >>> >>>As for the income tax, >>>as opposed to the other >>>taxes discussed in the IRC, >>>the only persons made liable >>>are "withholding agents". >>>Cf. in the definitions, >>>IRC 7701(a) et seq. >>> >>>You can confirm this by >>>submitting a FOIA request >>>for all IRC statutes, >>>other than those listed >>>in the defintion of >>>withholding agents, which >>>impose a liability. The >>>government will then be >>>required to admit, on record, >>>that there are no other >>>liability statutes. >>> >>>Be aware that a FOIA request >>>will thrust you into the >>>District Court of the United States, >>>where you belong anyway. Have >>>you considered a removal action? >>> >>>> >>>>I am presently compiling a compendium respecting especially the first >>>>and tangentially the second issue stated above. >>> >>>You need Kennelly's letter, >>>and her testimony, under oath. >>>Ask her why she never answered >>>Paul Mitchell's letters. Or, >>>get leave of the court to depose >>>her. Her letter is earth-shaking >>>(see Press Release infra). >>> >>>> >>>>Should any counselor have comment, experience, interest, expertise, or >>>>briefs respecting the above issues your response will be most sincerely >>>>appreciated. Significant work has been done, and I have done some >>>>interesting research on this point, but there is no compendium to which >>>>I am aware which amalgamates the sum of argument(s) in one compendium. >>> >>>See "The Federal Zone" available >>>on the Internet via the Alta Vista >>>search engine. >>> >>> >>>>Any counselor who makes make a submission will receive the end product >>>>compendium and will be advised of developments as this issue proceeds >>>>through the bowels of the USDC and the Bankruptcy forums. >>> >>>You know you are in the wrong >>>court for any criminal prosecutions, >>>don't you? >>> >>> >>> (Hey, I have >>>>to provide an incentive of some type - don't I?) Thanks and >>>> >>>>Constitutionally, >>>> >>>>Jospeh Dale Robertson >>>>joseph.d.robertson@mail.nhmccd.tx.us >>>> >>>> >>> >>>[This text is formatted in Courier 11, non-proportional spacing.] >>> >>>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE August 28, 1996 >>> >>> >>> Congresswoman Suspected of Income Tax Evasion >>> >>> >>>Payson, Arizona. Paul Mitchell, a Counselor at Law and Citizen >>>of Arizona state, today challenged U.S. Representative Barbara >>>Kennelly to stop evading the big question about federal income >>>taxes: Does the term "State" at Internal Revenue Code 3121(e) >>>include only the named federal territories and possessions of the >>>District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam and >>>American Samoa? Can this be income tax evasion? Read on. >>> >>> In a letter to Mr. John Randall of San Diego last January >>>24, Kennelly responded to a written request from Randall asking >>>her if the word "State" in 26 U.S. Code 3121(e) and in other >>>pending legislation were the same. Rep. Kennelly, a Democrat >>>from Connecticut, first checked with the Legislative Counsel and >>>with the Congressional Research Service about the definition. >>>"According to these legal experts," answered Kennelly, "the >>>definitions are not the same. The term state in 26 U.S. Code >>>3121 (e) specifically includes only the named U.S. territories >>>and possessions." Her letter to Randall, on official House of >>>Representatives stationery, was dated January 24, 1996. >>> >>> This admission is earth-shaking, according to Paul Mitchell, >>>who has conducted an in-depth investigation of federal laws and >>>the U.S. Constitution for seven years now. If the Internal >>>Revenue Code was deliberately written to confuse the American >>>people into believing that "State" means "Arizona" or >>>"California," when it does not, then the Congress has a lot of >>>explaining to do. Mitchell has since challenged Kennelly to >>>produce copies of the correspondence she received from the >>>Legislative Counsel and Congressional Research Service, but she >>>has now fallen silent and refuses to answer any follow-up >>>letters. Congress, incidentally, exempted themselves from the >>>disclosure requirements of the Freedom of Information Act. >>> >>> Writing under several pen names, Paul Mitchell's work has >>>reached all the way into the U.S. Supreme Court, which adopted >>>"the federal zone" as a household word in their sweeping 1995 >>>decision in U.S. v. Lopez. His book entitled The Federal Zone: >>>Cracking the Code of Internal Revenue, was first published in >>>1992, and became an instant underground success for its lucid >>>language and indisputable legal authority. The book was >>>originally written in electronic form, which made it easy to >>>disseminate through the Internet. The fourth edition can be >>>viewed with the Alta Vista search engine, developed by Digital >>>Equipment Corporation. The Internet version does not preserve >>>any bold, underline, or italics, however. Mitchell has used >>>special character formats to highlight important words and >>>phrases in federal statutes and case laws, easing the reader's >>>burden of deciphering an otherwise unintelligible code. >>> >>> >>> Mitchell Challenges U.S. Rep. Barbara Kennelly: Page 1 of 2 >>> >>> It is clear, there is a huge difference between the area >>>covered by the federal zone, and the area covered by the 50 >>>States. "Money is a powerful motivation for all of us," writes >>>Mitchell in a chapter from the book. "Congress had literally >>>trillions of dollars to gain by convincing most Americans they >>>were inside its revenue base when, in fact, most Americans were >>>outside its revenue base, and remain outside even today. This is >>>deception on a grand scale, and the proof of this deception is >>>found in the statute itself." Indeed, the proof is now leaking >>>out on official Congressional stationery. >>> >>> Mitchell goes on to argue, it is no wonder why public >>>relations "officials" of the IRS cringe in fear when dedicated >>>Patriots admit, out loud and in person, that they have read the >>>law. It is quite stunning how the carefully crafted definitions >>>of "United States" do appear to unlock a statute that is horribly >>>complex and deliberately so. As fate would have it, these >>>carefully crafted definitions also expose perhaps the greatest >>>fiscal fraud that has ever been perpetrated upon any people at >>>any time in the history of the world. It is now time for a shift >>>in the wind. That shift is being driven by a growing >>>understanding of personal status and its relation to government >>>territorial jurisdiction. >>> >>> The vivid pattern that has now painfully emerged is that >>>"citizens of the United States", as defined in federal tax law, >>>are the intended victims of a modern statutory slavery that was >>>predicted by the infamous Hazard Circular soon after the Civil >>>War began. This circular admitted that chattel slavery was >>>doomed, so the bankers needed to invent a new kind of slaves. >>>These "statutory" slaves are now burdened with a bogus federal >>>debt which is spiralling out of control. The White House budget >>>office recently invented a new kind of "generational accounting" >>>so as to project a tax load of seventy-one percent on future >>>generations of these "citizens of the United States". The final >>>version of that report upped the projection to eighty percent. >>>"It is our duty to ensure that this statutory slavery is soon >>>gone with the wind, just like its grisly and ill-fated >>>predecessor," concludes Paul Mitchell. >>> >>> The fifth anniversary edition of The Federal Zone will be >>>available before the end of the year. Copies of Mitchell's >>>correspondence with U.S. Representative Kennelly can be obtained >>>by sending email to pmitch@primenet.com, Mitchell's email address >>>on the Internet. >>> >>> >>> # # # >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Mitchell Challenges U.S. Rep. Barbara Kennelly: Page 2 of 2 >>> >>>=========================================================== >>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.: pmitch@primenet.com >>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state >>>=========================================================== >>> >>> >> >> >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail