Time: Wed Oct 30 13:09:26 1996 To: Electra From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] Subject: Please forward to Nancy Lord Cc: Bcc: >Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 13:08:13 >To: "William C. Beeler" <cenmonet@socketis.net> >From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] >Subject: The Constitution >Bcc: richard@caprica.com,neilnord@primenet.com,defense@mindspring.com > >Dear William, > >Because of a long string of clients >who have chosen to believe a vicious >lie that I am some kind of government >"agent", and other such nonsense, I >am currently out a rather substantial >sum of fees which were never paid. >It is now getting difficult to pay >my rent, believe it or not. So, I will >share this mail with my colleagues >in the Supreme Law Firm, and see if >we can come up with some recommendations >for you. I would begin, as I always >do with government personnel, by filing >immediate FOIA requests for their credentials, >including but not necessarily limited to >their oaths of office, delegations of >authority, fidelity bond (or surety), >and licenses to practice law in the state(s) >whey they operated (if any). Once these >FOIA requests are filed, the clock starts >running on the responses. After 10 working >days (no weekends or federal holidays), a >timely FOIA appeal is filed. After 20 >working days, all administrative remedies >are exhausted, and you are eligible to >compel production of the requested documents >in the District Court of the United States, >the court of original jurisdiction under >5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B). I can share with >you here an electronic copy of the Citizen's >Guide to the FOIA/PA, published by Congress >in a rare moment of sanity. Be advised that >this Citizen's Guide is wrong about the court >of original jurisdiction; we have this on >authority of a federal judge in Arizona, >late last spring. > >I hope this helps. Please pass this message >along to the people who need it. > >/s/ Paul Mitchell > > > >At 02:39 PM 10/30/96 -0600, you wrote: >>Mr. Paul Andrew, Mitchell >> >>Dear Sir: >> >>This is something that may or may not be of >>interest. >> >>An incident occurred in Southwest Missouri >>last year and I believe was September 19th >>1995, to a Mother of four children home alone, >>who were terrorized by the Sheriff's deputies >>dressed in black and armed with automatic weapons. >>It also included one Highway Patrol Officer, >>and later the BATF were brought in. >> >>In the end result she was vindicated and all >>charges were dropped. >> >>She has tried to find a competent counselor to >>initiate a class action lawsuit. The couple is >>underfunded as lost their property fighting corrupt >>first attorney and subsequent cost. The story is >>quite lengthy and all documentation is available. >> >>The Rutherford Institute says that her case is a >>good one but they themselves cannot find an attorney >>who will or has time to take the case as it will require >>a large amount of time and as usual there is no money >>to advance to cover start up cost. >> >>Do you know of anyone who would be willing to tackle >>this case and will provide the Lady's phone and fax >>and address for contact and she will send all of the >>necessary portfolio for review. >> >>I broke the story on the Internet and got her on the >>airwaves for protection -- this is a story of abuses >>of every amendment and would appreciate any advice or >>assistance that can be offered. The Rutherford Institute >>thought they had some firm in Arkansas that would take the >>case but were covered until April before being able to >>handle. She has an attorney here in Missouri that will >>take the case but needs assistance. >> >>I know time constraints in this hectic world have everyone >>grid locked. If you can find the time and have anyone who >>might consider looking at the documentation and will >>provide a mail address will see that the paperwork is sent. >> >>Respectfully >> >>William C. Beeler >>Central Missouri Network >>3801 Grace Ellen Dr. >>Columbia, MO 75202 >>(573) 474 - 3083 >>(573) 886 - 8527 Fax >>"William Beeler"<cenmonet@socketis.net> >>*************************************************** >> >> >> >>**************************************************** >>>Objection. The Constitution is more >>>than adequate for today's world. >>>The States are empowered sufficiently >>>to legislate for all the matters >>>which are not within the power of >>>Congress to legislate for the inhabitants >>>and land of the state zone. A major >>>"problem" with the Constitution, however, >>>is that we cannot seem to agree on the >>>exact provisions contained therein. >>>But, that is not a problem with the >>>Constitution, but with ourselves. >>> >>>/s/ Paul Mitchell >>> >>> >>>=========================================================== >>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.: pmitch@primenet.com >>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state >>>=========================================================== >>> >>> >>>-> Send "subscribe snetnews " to majordomo@alterzone.com >>>-> Posted by: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar] >>> >>> >> >> >
Return to Table of Contents for
Supreme Law School: E-mail