Time: Wed Oct 30 13:29:52 1996
To: Electra
From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
Subject: Please forward to Nancy Lord
Cc: 
Bcc: 

>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 13:29:43 -0700 (MST)
>From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@primenet.com>
>To: [address in tool bar]
>Subject: Returned mail: Host unknown (Name server: mindspring.com: no data known)
>
>The original message was received at Wed, 30 Oct 1996 13:28:58 -0700 (MST)
>from ip165.tus.primenet.com [198.68.42.165]
>
>   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
><defense@mindspring.com>
>
>   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
>550 <defense@mindspring.com>... Host unknown (Name server: mindspring.com: no data known)
>
>   ----- Original message follows -----
>
>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 13:28:58 -0700 (MST)
>To: <electra@texas.net>
>From: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>Subject: Missouri prospect
>
>>Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 15:13:42 -0500
>>To: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>>From: Nancy Lord <defense@mindspring.com>
>>Subject: Re: The Constitution
>>
>>At 01:09 PM 10/30/96 -0700, you wrote:
>>>Dear William,
>>>
>>>Because of a long string of clients
>>>who have chosen to believe a vicious
>>>lie that I am some kind of government
>>>"agent", and other such nonsense, I
>>
>>Dear Paul,
>>
>>        I think I talked to them too, at a rally
>>for Bob last April, just before I moved back.
>>Same problem.  Can't travel to & fro Missouri
>>on my own dime.  But if they want me to work
>>from here I can, we traded messages awhile 
>>& I'm not as busy now.
>
>
>Let's see what they do with 
>the FOIA idea.  If they want
>us to litigate, using the DCUS
>idea, then they can come up
>with some money for us.  Now
>that Neil & Evelyn are on-line,
>we can begin to share Supreme
>Law Firm business without 
>leaving the comfort of our 
>living rooms.  That was always
>one of my major objectives for
>any Principal or Firm Member.
>I have had some minor success so
>far with this business plan, but
>the first ones to retain me had
>no idea how to spell Eudora,
>and still don't, even after buying it.
>I must be underestimating my 25
>years of computer experience.
>I will keep you in the loop.
>
>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>
>P.S.  I am copying this to Electra,
>Richard, and Neil & Evelyn.
>
>
>>        Your forward from Electra:  Still getting
>>bounces?   Experiment:   Try sending something
>>to me and somebody else.   Those seem to be
>>getting through.   This is getting scary, it seems
>>to be targeted at you and me and nobody else.
>>        Gids time.  If you don't get a quick response,
>>I'm out.   
>>Nancy.
>
>Neal Kelsey will figure it out,
>even if it takes him a week.
>Here's a buck to say he is not
>challenged by this problem.
>
>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>
>P.S.  0000  =  I Pobot, I "smOOOOches"
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>am currently out a rather substantial
>>>sum of fees which were never paid.
>>>It is now getting difficult to pay 
>>>my rent, believe it or not.  So, I will
>>>share this mail with my colleagues
>>>in the Supreme Law Firm, and see if
>>>we can come up with some recommendations
>>>for you.  I would begin, as I always
>>>do with government personnel, by filing
>>>immediate FOIA requests for their credentials,
>>>including but not necessarily limited to
>>>their oaths of office, delegations of
>>>authority, fidelity bond (or surety),
>>>and licenses to practice law in the state(s)
>>>whey they operated (if any).  Once these
>>>FOIA requests are filed, the clock starts
>>>running on the responses.  After 10 working
>>>days (no weekends or federal holidays), a
>>>timely FOIA appeal is filed.  After 20
>>>working days, all administrative remedies
>>>are exhausted, and you are eligible to 
>>>compel production of the requested documents
>>>in the District Court of the United States,
>>>the court of original jurisdiction under
>>>5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B).  I can share with 
>>>you here an electronic copy of the Citizen's
>>>Guide to the FOIA/PA, published by Congress
>>>in a rare moment of sanity.  Be advised that
>>>this Citizen's Guide is wrong about the court
>>>of original jurisdiction;  we have this on
>>>authority of a federal judge in Arizona, 
>>>late last spring.  
>>>
>>>I hope this helps.  Please pass this message
>>>along to the people who need it.
>>>
>>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>At 02:39 PM 10/30/96 -0600, you wrote:
>>>>Mr. Paul Andrew, Mitchell
>>>>
>>>>Dear Sir:
>>>>
>>>>This is something that may or may not be of 
>>>>interest.
>>>>
>>>>An incident occurred in Southwest Missouri 
>>>>last year and I believe was September 19th
>>>>1995, to a Mother of four children home alone,
>>>>who were terrorized by the Sheriff's deputies
>>>>dressed in black and armed with automatic weapons.
>>>>It also included one Highway Patrol Officer,
>>>>and later the BATF were brought in.  
>>>>
>>>>In the end result she was vindicated and all
>>>>charges were dropped.  
>>>>
>>>>She has tried to find a competent counselor to
>>>>initiate a class action lawsuit.  The couple is
>>>>underfunded as lost their property fighting corrupt
>>>>first attorney and subsequent cost.  The story is
>>>>quite lengthy and all documentation is available.
>>>>
>>>>The Rutherford Institute says that her case is a 
>>>>good one but they themselves cannot find an attorney
>>>>who will or has time to take the case as it will require
>>>>a large amount of time and as usual there is no money
>>>>to advance to cover start up cost.
>>>>
>>>>Do you know of anyone who would be willing to tackle
>>>>this case and will provide the Lady's phone and fax
>>>>and address for contact and she will send all of the 
>>>>necessary portfolio for review.
>>>>
>>>>I broke the story on the Internet and got her on the
>>>>airwaves for protection -- this is a story of abuses
>>>>of every amendment and would appreciate any advice or
>>>>assistance that can be offered.  The Rutherford Institute
>>>>thought they had some firm in Arkansas that would take the
>>>>case but were covered until April before being able to 
>>>>handle.  She has an attorney here in Missouri that will
>>>>take the case but needs assistance.
>>>>
>>>>I know time constraints in this hectic world have everyone
>>>>grid locked.  If you can find the time and have anyone who
>>>>might consider looking at the documentation and will 
>>>>provide a mail address will see that the paperwork is sent.
>>>>
>>>>Respectfully
>>>>
>>>>William C. Beeler
>>>>Central Missouri Network
>>>>3801 Grace Ellen Dr.
>>>>Columbia, MO 75202
>>>>(573) 474 - 3083
>>>>(573) 886 - 8527 Fax
>>>>"William Beeler"<cenmonet@socketis.net>
>>>>***************************************************
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>****************************************************
>>>>>Objection.  The Constitution is more
>>>>>than adequate for today's world.
>>>>>The States are empowered sufficiently
>>>>>to legislate for all the matters
>>>>>which are not within the power of 
>>>>>Congress to legislate for the inhabitants
>>>>>and land of the state zone.  A major
>>>>>"problem" with the Constitution, however,
>>>>>is that we cannot seem to agree on the
>>>>>exact provisions contained therein.
>>>>>But, that is not a problem with the
>>>>>Constitution, but with ourselves.
>>>>>
>>>>>/s/ Paul Mitchell
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>===========================================================
>>>>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.:  pmitch@primenet.com                  
>>>>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>>>>>===========================================================
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>-> Send "subscribe   snetnews " to majordomo@alterzone.com
>>>>>->  Posted by: Paul Andrew Mitchell [address in tool bar]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>===========================================================
>>>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.:  pmitch@primenet.com                  
>>>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>>>===========================================================
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>===========================================================
>Paul Andrew, Mitchell, B.A., M.S.:  pmitch@primenet.com                  
>ship to: c/o 2509 N. Campbell, #1776, Tucson, Arizona state
>===========================================================
>
>
>
>
      


Return to Table of Contents for

Supreme Law School:   E-mail